Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity and Vanguard Since 1971

Are You Prepared for Nuclear War?

January 17, 2023 By Richard C. Young

By mwreck @ Shutterstock.com

In the Unz Review, Philip Giraldi explains the effort by those in government and media to reassure the public that nuclear war is somehow a manageable event. The idea that the government and its allies in the media may be psychologically preparing the nation to accept the inevitability of nuclear war is frightening. He writes:

Even though one has become accustomed to seeing the United States government behaving irrationally on an epic scale with no concern for what happens to the average citizen who is not a member of one of the freak show constituencies of the Democratic Party, it is still possible to be surprised or even shocked. Shortly before year’s end 2022 an article appeared in the mainstream media and was quite widely circulated. The headline that it was featured under in the original Business Insider version read “A nuclear attack would most likely target one of these 6 US cities — but an expert says none of them are prepared.” The cities were New York, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and San Francisco.

The article seeks to provide information and tips that would allow one to survive a nuclear attack, repeating commentary from several “experts” in emergency management and “public health” suggesting that a nuclear war would be catastrophic but not necessarily the end of the world. One should be prepared. It observes that “those cities would struggle to provide emergency services to the wounded. The cities also no longer have designated fallout shelters to protect people from radiation.” It is full of sage advice and off-the-cuff observations, including “Can you imagine a public official keeping buildings intact for fallout shelters when the real-estate market is so tight?” Or even better the advice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)’s “nuclear detonation planning guide” that for everyday citizens in a city that has been nuked: “Get inside, stay inside, and stay tuned.” Dr. Ron Paul asks “Are they insane? They act as if a nuclear attack on the United States is just another inconvenience to plan for, like an ice storm or a hurricane.”

The article argues that the six cities would be prime targets as they are centers for vital infrastructure. The bomb blasts would kill hundreds of thousands or even millions of Americans with many more deaths to follow from radiation poisoning, but the article makes no attempt to explain why Russia, with a relatively sane leadership, would want to start a nuclear war that would potentially destroy the planet. Also, the targeting list of the cities provided by the “experts” is itself a bit odd. Surely Russia would attack military and government targets as a first priority to limit the possible retaliation while also crippling the ability of the White House and Pentagon to command and control the situation. Such targets would include both San Diego and Norfolk where the US Atlantic and Pacific fleets are based as well as the various Strategic Air Command bases and the underground federal government evacuation site in Mount Weather Virginia.

Reading the article, one is reminded of the early years of the Cold War that sought to reassure the public that nuclear war was somehow manageable. It was a time when we elementary school children were drilled in hiding under our desks when the air raid alarm went off. Herman Kahn was, at that time, the most famous advocate of the school of thought that the United States could survive the “unthinkable,” i.e. a nuclear war. An American physicist by training, Kahn became a founding member of the beyond neocon nationalist Hudson Institute, which is still unfortunately around. Kahn, who served in the US Army during the Second World War as a non-combat telephone lineman, started has career as a military strategist at the RAND Corporation. Kahn endorsed a policy of deterrence and argued that if the Soviet Union believed that the United States had a devastating second-strike capability then Moscow would not initiate hostilities, which he explained in his paper titled “The Nature and Feasibility of War and Deterrence”. The Russians had to believe that even a perfectly coordinated massive attack would guarantee a measure of retaliation that would leave them devastated as well. Kahn also posited his idea of a “winnable” nuclear exchange in his 1960 book On Thermonuclear War for which he is often cited as one of the inspirations for the title character of Stanley Kubrick’s classic film Dr. Strangelove.

The appearance of the Business Insider article dealing with a cool discussion of the survivability from a nuclear war suggests that the nutcases are again escaping from the psychiatric hospital here in the US and are obtaining top jobs in government and the media. While one continues to hope that somehow someone will wake up in the White House and realize that the deep dark hole that we the American people find ourselves in mandates a change of course and a genuine reset, there is little daylight visible in the darkness.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • War With Russia?
  • A U.S.-Russia War?
  • Is Syria Worth a War with Russia?
  • War Dogs Reigniting Georgia/Russia Bonfire
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Richard C. Young
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • The Constitutional Case Against CBDCs - September 22, 2023
  • The Government Attack on Americans’ Independence - September 22, 2023
  • Hong Kong Loses Top Spot in Economic Freedom Index - September 21, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • The Butterfly Effect and Chaotic Markets
  • ACTRESS: “Liberal Politicians Are Ruining Cities”
  • I Meant to Tell You My Recent “Survival Guy” Story
  • Are You Prepared to Run Out of Water?
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes, America’s Food Kings
  • DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”
  • The Common Ground of Democracy is Sinking Beneath Americans’ Feet
  • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • A Look at the Future of Main Street America

Our Most Popular Posts

  • A High-Speed Collision with Reality
  • Will the UAW Get What It Wants?
  • New York Finds a New Way to Harass Gun Owners
  • Ron Paul Exposed the Fed and the Neocon Scam
  • Americans Are Not Happy with Bidenomics
  • Don't Tread on America's Children
  • Bidenomics Gutting Real Household Income
  • “I Want to Be a Farmer, a Garbageman, or Tom Brady”
  • Do You Really Need 8 Glasses of Water a Day?
  • So Much for Mozart

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Wellington and Wellesley Funds Not Managed by Vanguard
  • Inflation Could Kill Social Security
  • Will the Fed Hold Up Its End of the Bargain?
  • Should America Move Closer to the Saudis, or Push them Away?
  • Don’t Ask Me When to Haul Your Boat
  • Robot Warehouses Need Better Internet
  • California Mandates Drive Diesel Truck Buying Spree
  • Americans Are Not Happy with Bidenomics
  • Paris’s Big Plans for the Champs-Elysées
  • A Plan for Cutting Federal Government Spending

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Wellington and Wellesley Funds Not Managed by Vanguard
  • Remembering Jimmy Buffett: The Oldest Surfer on the Beach
  • The Folly of Windmills from Nowhere USA
  • NYC Rolling Out the Robocops
  • Will the Fed Hold Up Its End of the Bargain?
  • Are Most NFTs Now Worthless?
  • 2ND AMENDMENT ALERT: Biden to Create New Anti-Gun Office
  • Don’t Ask Me When to Haul Your Boat
  • You May Be Surprised by America’s “Least Woke City”
  • GREENWASHING: What’s in a Name?

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Five Year Treasury Yield

Skyrocketing Costs of Building a Green Grid Are Starting

Wellington and Wellesley Funds Not Managed by Vanguard

The Constitutional Case Against CBDCs

The Government Attack on Americans’ Independence

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives