Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • World Gold Mine Production

Today’s Wild West of Retail Marketing

April 12, 2023 By The Editors

By Everett Collection @ Shutterstock.com

In the Robin Report, Jasmine Glasheen brings attention to the “Wild West” nature of influencer, and now de-influencer, marketing on social media, where oftentimes personalities are being paid to either recommend or disparage a product without telling the audience about the remuneration. Glasheen writes:

Have you been seeing the phrase “late capitalism” pop up a lot lately? The term was originally attributed to German economist Werner Sombart referring to economic, political, and social deprivations associated with the aftermath of the first world war. The way we see it used in 2023, late capitalism has come to refer to an absurdist level of consumerism. And it’s in this environment of late capitalism, surrounded by $2,050 Balenciaga plush snake neck noodles and celebrities that openly mainline diabetes medication for weight loss, that the de-influencer movement came to power.

The de-influencer movement is a hybrid of the next-gen desire for accessible celebrities and the social element of online product reviews. Let’s take a look at how de-influencers came to be, the issues they shed light on, and how retailers can benefit from it without risking consumer trust. Let’s dive right in.

She continues later:

“De-influencer” is now also being used to describe influencers openly disparaging specific high-priced items on social media. The trend was started by everyday folks encouraging other everyday folks to consume less. Whether it was mocking specific off-the-rails fashion trends –– there are many to choose from these days –– or showing off low-priced alternative to trending items, de-influencers had an anti-consumerist aim. While there are plenty of authentic de-influencers trying to help their followers better their lives through more strategic purchasing, there are also a bevy of faux de-influencers, hiding the sponsored nature of their posts for financial profit and social accolades.

Later she writes:

Influencer marketing is maturing, and de-influencing seems like a new movement to make social media more beneficial to the people it serves… at least at first glance. Here’s the issue: Faux de-influencers tell customers not to buy certain products, only to recommend cheaper –– often sponsored –– alternatives. There are also concerns that faux de-influencers are being used to help certain brands achieve market domination, by taking down competitors’ inventory. Since the FTC is nowhere near being able to identify and penalize every unlabeled sponsored post, de-influencing is still the Wild West of retail marketing. And as always, it will take frontline consumers a few years to catch up with this practice.

Consider that 61 percent of consumers trust influencer recommendations –– particularly those of compulsively transparent micro-influencers who come across as “real people.” Now imagine how much consumer wallet share will be thrown at products advertised with faux transparency and faux “non-biased” reviews by faux de-influencers before the FTC catches up with the trend.

It’s not all the de-influencers’ fault, either. They need followers to drive lucrative collaborations, but they need sponsors to pay them for the work they do. Phys.org calls this phenomenon “role conflict:” when an influencer’s followers expect them to post transparent, unbiased recommendations, but brands expect the influencers they hire to portray their products in a positive light. Make no mistake, brands are already paying de-influencers to trash their competitors without disclosing their affiliation. Yes, this is unethical. And yes, it happens every day.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • E.J.’s Notes from the Wild, Wild West
  • Greetings From Key West
  • Greetings from Key West
  • Greetings from Key West
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • The Sham Claims of Lab-Grown “Meat” - June 6, 2023
  • Tensions Rising in the Taiwan Strait - June 6, 2023
  • Should McCarthy Have Forced the Government’s Hand? - June 5, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • The Worst President in American History
  • Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Charles Koch Team Up
  • Making America Great Again Is What America Wants
  • Marry Compound Interest, Divorce Market Timing
  • The Claremont Institute: Protecting the American Way of Life
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France
  • Your Odds with Statins: 500 to 1?
  • Sen. Hawley Makes the Case Against U.S.-China Relationship
  • WAR HAS BEGUN: What Advice Are You Giving Your Loved Ones?
  • Can Ginger Combat Heart Disease and Improve Circulation?

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Joe Biden’s Death Warrant for Fossil Fuel Plants
  • Stossel Says DeSantis Is "Smarter and Better than Biden."
  • The Party Is Going Off the Rails
  • Will Anyone from the FBI Be Held Accountable for the Russiagate Hoax?
  • America’s Favorite Wordsmith Needs Tutoring
  • Rewarding Loyalty with Ridicule
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • The Nickel Pickle from EVs
  • Pushing the Envelope Too Far
  • June Is Retirement Compounders Month

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Successful Investing Is a Mindset
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • Does the Government Have a Plan to “Sneak Through” CBDCs?
  • OPEC+: Saudi Arabia To Cut 1M Barrels of Oil Production
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • What’s Hiding In the London Metals Exchange Warehouses?
  • Is the World Ready for “Mixed Reality?”
  • Does AI Need More Time to Cook?
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • June Is Retirement Compounders Month

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • Your Survival Guy’s Best Insider’s Guide to Rome
  • What Is a Fiduciary Duty? Are You Working with a Fiduciary?
  • Survive and Thrive June 2023: Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Social Security: Declining Italy Needs a Bambino Boom

Is This the Summer of the Tick Fest

Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI

CBDCs Not “Just Another Form of Money”

Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding

ALLIGATOR MARKET: Calm Surface Hides Danger Below

The Sham Claims of Lab-Grown “Meat”

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives