Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • World Gold Mine Production

Facebook’s Attempts to Reform “Too little too late?”

October 23, 2019 By The Editors

By Alex Gontar @ Shutterstock.com

WIRED’s Paris Martineau reports that Facebook’s new reforms of its system are being called “too little, too late,” by critics. She writes:

Among the features announced Monday were new interstitials—notices that appear in front of a post—that warn users when content in their Instagram or Facebook feeds has been flagged as false by outside fact-checkers. Donovan says it makes sense to use a digital speed bump of sorts to restrict access to inaccurate content, but the notices may have the opposite effect.

“The first accounts that they choose to enforce that policy on are going to get a lot of attention,” from both the media and curious users, she explained. “We have to understand there’s going to be a bit of a boomerang effect.” She says “media manipulators” will test the system to see how Facebook responds, “and then they will innovate around them.”

Facebook did not respond to inquiries about when or where the feature would be rolled out, or whether it would apply to all content that had been rated partly or completely false by third-party fact-checkers.

Donovan says she’s not sure if the feature’s potential benefits are worth the risks of amplification, particularly since Facebook may not be able to identify and flag misleading content before it reaches people. “Taking it down two days later isn’t helpful,” nor is hiding it behind a notice, she says, “especially when it’s misinformation that’s traveling on the back of a viral news story, where we know that the first eight hours of that news story are the most consequential for people making assessments and bothering to read what the story is even about.”

Also Monday, Facebook said it would attach new labels to pages or ads run by media outlets that it deems to be “state-controlled,” like Russia Today. It said it will require that some pages with a lot of US-based users to be more transparent about who’s running them—this will at first apply only to verified business pages, and later include pages that run ads on social issues, elections or politics in the US. In addition, ads that discourage people from voting would no longer be permitted.

But researchers say that these measures are too little too late. “Every announcement like this, and all the recent publicity blitz has an undercurrent of inevitability,” says David Carroll, an associate professor at Parsons School of Design known for his quest to reclaim his Cambridge Analytica data. “It shows that they still need to show that they’re doing things. One advantage to these cosmetic things is that they look like they’re significant moves, but they’re really just like pretty small user interface tweaks.” But that’s not enough at this stage, he says.

The key question, researchers say, is enforcement, what Donovan calls “the Achilles heel of all of these platform companies.” She says Facebook issues many policies related to hate speech, misinformation, and election integrity. “But if they’re not willing to enforce those rules—especially on politicians, PACs, and super PACs—then they haven’t really done anything.”

In September, Facebook said politicians would be exempt from the company’s usual policies prohibiting posting misinformation and other forms of problematic content in the name of newsworthiness. Earlier this month, that exemption was extended to advertisements, giving users free rein to lie in Facebook ads so long as they are political candidates or officeholders.

This is the “big gaping hole” Facebook’s announcement Monday failed to address, says disinformation researcher (and WIRED Ideas contributor) Renee DiResta. Facebook’s policies contradict themselves, she says, as they try to simultaneously argue that misinformation is a problem when disseminated by foreign actors, but free expression when posted by anyone that falls under the vague category of “politician.”

Both DiResta and Donovan expressed concerns as to whether Facebook’s new transparency measures and election integrity policies would be applied to political candidates at all. On the press call, Zuckerberg emphasized that he didn’t think it was right for a private company like Facebook to “censor” the speech of politicians—a point he argued at length last week in a speech at Georgetown University—but noted that there were exceptions, when the person calls for violence or urges voter suppression, for example.

Read more here.

Related Posts

  • Facebook-Deactivated
  • “Repeal, Replace and Reform.”
  • Pension Reform?
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • Why Is Carcinogenic Monkey Virus DNA in COVID Vaccines? - May 31, 2023
  • Google Knows Where You Are and What You’re Thinking - May 31, 2023
  • What Would They Give Up for “Equity”? - May 24, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews My Favorite Florida Farmer
  • Rich Grandchild, Poor Grandchild
  • How Will YOU Feel in Retirement? Let Me Explain
  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • My Smith & Wesson Revolvers Home Defense Team
  • Hey, Where’s Everyone Going? Follow the Money Kid
  • Who Is Alex Jones?
  • Is Rutin Useful in Preventing Blood Clots?
  • To Me There Isn’t a Better Way to Live
  • Joel Salatin Can Help Americans Beat Food Inflation

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Joe Biden’s Death Warrant for Fossil Fuel Plants
  • Stossel Says DeSantis Is "Smarter and Better than Biden."
  • America’s Favorite Wordsmith Needs Tutoring
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Will Anyone from the FBI Be Held Accountable for the Russiagate Hoax?
  • Pushing the Envelope Too Far
  • Preserving Liberty Through Homeschooling
  • The Party Is Going Off the Rails
  • Commemorating Memorial Day
  • What Does That Have to Do with Your Dividend?

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • A Cashless Society Is A Debacle for Americans
  • Democracy: The Most Dangerous and Insidious Effect of Majority Rule.
  • What’s the Alternative to China for Manufacturers?
  • Here Come the Adjustments to Earnings
  • Container Production Cuts a Sign of Declining Trade?
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Happy Memorial Day!
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Money Market Assets Hit Record High: $5.4 Trillion

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Survive and Thrive June 2023: Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Social Security: Declining Italy Needs a Bambino Boom
  • ATTACK ON THE IVAN KHURS: Unmanned Vessels Changing Naval Warfare
  • The Future of the American City is This…
  • Happy Memorial Day: Your Survival Guy: Proud To Be an American
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Insurers Now Fleeing the Net Zero Insurance Alliance
  • A Three-Week International Research Trip to Paris via Rome

Rewarding Loyalty with Ridicule

Auto Profitability Colliding with Low Emissions

Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era

What Binds the Woke Left Together?

Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes, America’s Food Kings

The Party Is Going Off the Rails

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives