Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • My Rifles
  • Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Old Confederacy
  • Main Street Conservative
  • BLM’s Marxist Agenda
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Freedom Force
  • Dick Young’s Safe America

The Real Nature of Investment Risk

May 8, 2009 By Dave Hammer

When I got into the investments business well over 40 years ago, nobody had figured out a way to actually measure the risk of an investment. But several people, notably some professors at well-known business schools, were working on the idea that risk could be considered the same as variability of periodic return. Even better, if these academics could prove investment returns were “normally distributed” over time, i.e. if the periodic returns (daily, weekly, monthly or annually) could be put on a time-chart with the results looking something like a bell-shaped curve, then risk (variability of return) could be accurately measured. As it turned out, investment returns, over time, looked almost like a bell shaped curve, except that there were more periods of excessively high or low returns than expected. But, the results were close enough for these mathematicians to believe they could measure risk by looking at the average (mean) long-term return and compare it to each of the individual periodic returns, then compute the average difference between the two (variance). This became known as mean-variance analysis (or what might be called return/risk analysis).

Standard deviation is a fancy statistical term meaning the maximum variance that takes place no more than 68% of the time. The other 32% of the time the variance would be greater. For example, if common stocks have a mean (average) long-term, annualized return of 10% and a standard deviation of 15%, then 68% of the time the annual returns for stocks will be between +25% and -5% (10% plus or minus 15%). The rest of the time the annual returns will be greater than 25% or less than -5%.  Bonds might have a mean annual return of 5% and a standard deviation of 5%, implying 68% of the time the annual return of bonds will fall between 10% and 0%. Under this definition of risk, even supposedly risk-free T-bills have risk. The average return of T-bills might be 3% per year, but in any given year, the return may be more or less than 3%.

The fascinating thing is, when you compare the average return of all individual classes of securities (including real estate, gold, foreign currency, etc.) to their respective risks (variance of returns), they are all proportional. That is, the greater the return, the greater the risk. So, there is no magic to the investment business. The more risk you take, the greater the expected return; BUT, not necessarily the greater the actual return.  If a person makes an investment that historically (say, based on 40 years of data), has provided a return of 10% (like common stocks), this does not mean that the annual return will be 10% per year over the next 2, 5, or 10 years. That’s where variance comes in. Fortunately, variance-of-return is a function of the square-root of time. So, the annualized variance of a class of securities held for 4 years will have only twice (not 4 times) the annualized variance (risk) of a holding period of 1 year. If stocks have an annual variance of 15%, but someone holds a stock portfolio for 40 years, then the annualized variance of return (risk) will turn out to be 15% divided by the square-root of 40, or only 2.4%!

This is why an investor’s portfolio should always be allocated between high-risk and low-risk securities according to their time-horizon (expected investing period).

Related Posts

  • John Bolton: America’s Real National Security Risk
  • The Biggest Investment Risk of Your Life
  • Equity Risk Premiums Still too High
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Dave Hammer
David A. Hammer is a Managing Partner at Hammer Asset Management, LLC in Auburn, CA.
Latest posts by Dave Hammer (see all)
  • Chuck Berry – The #1 Pioneer of Rock and Roll - March 22, 2017
  • Dave Hammer: Way Down on the Swanee - July 1, 2015
  • So Easy When You Know How - June 4, 2015

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Tucker Explains: Breakdown of American Family and Society to Blame for Shootings
  • Stunned Democrats Against “Defund Police”
  • America’s Colleges Have Become Progressive Liberal Rat Holes
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France
  • Gold/Silver Coins No Longer Allowed in Safe Deposit Boxes
  • Globalism Has Made America Dependent on Foreign Countries
  • Why Black Lives Matter Needs to Be Shut Down
  • Ted Nugent Tells it Like it Is
  • The Simple, Elegant Power of the Retirement Compounders
  • Gold’s 50-Year Price Explosion

Our Most Popular Posts

  • The Recklessness of Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • The Stock Market Is About Money Flows Not Politics.
  • Dick Young’s Safe America: Chapter 1, Part I
  • Who Are Those Urging Violence?
  • Smith Family Robinson in Live Free or Die, NH
  • Warmongering Firestarters Victoria Nuland and Samantha Powers Back
  • Cancel Culture, the Great Purge, Double Standards
  • How Are You Doing on a Local Level?
  • How S.D. Surged in Vaccination Inoculations
  • Insurrection Was the Furthest Thing from Trump’s Mind

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Do You Know Who’s the Largest Owner of Farmland in America?
  • Investors Are Being Conditioned Not To Recognise the Danger
  • I’ve Been in Richard Young’s Maximizers for Years
  • What Is the Stock Market’s Link to the Economy?
  • Smith Family Robinson in Live Free or Die, NH
  • Dick Young’s Safe America: Chapter 1, Part I
  • Whether Through Audacity or Ignorance, Stock Fundamentals Are Being Ignored
  • Happy Martin Luther King Jr. Day!
  • The Fed is Sacrificing Retirees to Save the Banks
  • Jim Simons’s Renaissance Technologies vs. Internet Forum Traders

Ten Republican Senators to Get Behind

Why Do Government Officials Want To Silence Their Opponents?

And 2022 Is Right Around the Corner

PANDEMIC Pushes Military-Grade Surveillance on Americans Like YOU

Facebook Is Already Censoring This Letter

This Guy Is America’s New President: Shotgun Joe

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives