Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

The Real Nature of Investment Risk

May 8, 2009 By Dave Hammer

When I got into the investments business well over 40 years ago, nobody had figured out a way to actually measure the risk of an investment. But several people, notably some professors at well-known business schools, were working on the idea that risk could be considered the same as variability of periodic return. Even better, if these academics could prove investment returns were “normally distributed” over time, i.e. if the periodic returns (daily, weekly, monthly or annually) could be put on a time-chart with the results looking something like a bell-shaped curve, then risk (variability of return) could be accurately measured. As it turned out, investment returns, over time, looked almost like a bell shaped curve, except that there were more periods of excessively high or low returns than expected. But, the results were close enough for these mathematicians to believe they could measure risk by looking at the average (mean) long-term return and compare it to each of the individual periodic returns, then compute the average difference between the two (variance). This became known as mean-variance analysis (or what might be called return/risk analysis).

Standard deviation is a fancy statistical term meaning the maximum variance that takes place no more than 68% of the time. The other 32% of the time the variance would be greater. For example, if common stocks have a mean (average) long-term, annualized return of 10% and a standard deviation of 15%, then 68% of the time the annual returns for stocks will be between +25% and -5% (10% plus or minus 15%). The rest of the time the annual returns will be greater than 25% or less than -5%.  Bonds might have a mean annual return of 5% and a standard deviation of 5%, implying 68% of the time the annual return of bonds will fall between 10% and 0%. Under this definition of risk, even supposedly risk-free T-bills have risk. The average return of T-bills might be 3% per year, but in any given year, the return may be more or less than 3%.

The fascinating thing is, when you compare the average return of all individual classes of securities (including real estate, gold, foreign currency, etc.) to their respective risks (variance of returns), they are all proportional. That is, the greater the return, the greater the risk. So, there is no magic to the investment business. The more risk you take, the greater the expected return; BUT, not necessarily the greater the actual return.  If a person makes an investment that historically (say, based on 40 years of data), has provided a return of 10% (like common stocks), this does not mean that the annual return will be 10% per year over the next 2, 5, or 10 years. That’s where variance comes in. Fortunately, variance-of-return is a function of the square-root of time. So, the annualized variance of a class of securities held for 4 years will have only twice (not 4 times) the annualized variance (risk) of a holding period of 1 year. If stocks have an annual variance of 15%, but someone holds a stock portfolio for 40 years, then the annualized variance of return (risk) will turn out to be 15% divided by the square-root of 40, or only 2.4%!

This is why an investor’s portfolio should always be allocated between high-risk and low-risk securities according to their time-horizon (expected investing period).

Related Posts

  • John Bolton: America’s Real National Security Risk
  • The Biggest Investment Risk of Your Life
  • Equity Risk Premiums Still too High
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Dave Hammer
David A. Hammer is a Managing Partner at Hammer Asset Management, LLC in Auburn, CA.
Latest posts by Dave Hammer (see all)
  • Chuck Berry – The #1 Pioneer of Rock and Roll - March 22, 2017
  • Dave Hammer: Way Down on the Swanee - July 1, 2015
  • So Easy When You Know How - June 4, 2015

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Your Survival Guy Prefers Bombardier’s Global Express 7500
  • “I’ve Got Guys Buying Guns/Ammo for Me All Through the Night.”
  • Conflict Between Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Progressivism (Globalism)
  • Escape From the City: You’re Going to Like What You See
  • DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians
  • The Masters of the Universe Align Themselves with CHINA Using YOUR Money?
  • FARM AMERICA: New York City’s Finest Cheesemongers
  • “An Epic Struggle Over the Definition of America”
  • The Common Ground of Democracy is Sinking Beneath Americans’ Feet
  • You Need to Seek Some Shelter for When Things Get Ugly

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Will Western Tanks Be a Game Changer in Ukraine?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Europe Should Protect Itself
  • “I Will Veto Everything They Send Me”
  • How to Fight Wokism Idiocy
  • US Debt Now Exceeds Annual GDP?
  • The Neocon Russia-Hoaxers of Hamilton 68 Must Be Held Accountable
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Pfizer CEO Terrified of Real Questions About His Vaccines

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • Do You Trust This Rally?
  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More
  • What Happens if the “Fed Put” Is Over for Good?
  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You?
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Are the Realists Winning the Debate over the Future of EVs?
  • CATO: Global Freedom Is in Sharp Decline
  • Biden Administration Destroying Retiree Fiduciary Protections

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • Treasury Bonds Ready to Rock and Roll
  • Survive and Thrive February 2023: 4 Life Changing Words: “You Should Try This”
  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You?
  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More
  • America’s Unprecedented Debt Problem
  • Iran’s Ballistic Missiles Could Give Russia the Edge in Ukraine
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?
  • Tactical Laser Weapon Achieves “First Light”

Breaking News: Reform at New College, Sarasota, Florida

German Opposition Leader Denounces the Country’s “Insane Drunkenness about War”

Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s

What Is Trump’s Argument for Election in 2024?

Powell Slows Fed Funds Rate Increases

Canadian Grain Harvest Drives Railroad Income Gains

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives