Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Gorsuch: “We Should All Be Originalists”

September 9, 2019 By The Editors

“We should all be originalists.” That’s the suggestion of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch in his new book “A Republic, if You Can Keep It.”

Here are some quotes from Gorsuch’s book:

  • Originalism teaches only that the Constitution’s original meaning is fixed.
  • Living constitutionalists often complain we can’t know the original understanding because the document’s too old and cryptic. Hardly. We figure out the original meaning of old and difficult texts all the time. Just ask any English professor who teaches Shakespeare or Beowulf.
  • I suspect the real complaint of living constitutionalists isn’t with old laws generally so much as it is with the particular terms of this old law.
  • The Constitution is short—only about 7,500 words, including all its amendments. It doesn’t dictate much about the burning social and political questions they care about. Instead, it leaves the resolution of those matters to elections and votes and the amendment process.
  • And it seems this is the real problem for the critics. For when it comes to the social and political questions of the day they care most about, many living constitutionalists would prefer to have philosopher-king judges swoop down from their marble palace to ordain answers rather than allow the people and their representatives to discuss, debate, and resolve them.
  • You could even say the real complaint here is with our democracy.
  • Of course, some suggest that originalism leads to bad results because the results inevitably happen to be politically conservative results. Rubbish. Originalism is a theory focused on process, not on substance. It is not “Conservative” with a big C focused on politics. It is conservative in the small c sense that it seeks to conserve the meaning of the Constitution as it was written.

The Wall Street Journal’s Kyle Peterson reviews the book, writing:

Justice Neil Gorsuch has two rules for his law clerks. “Rule No. 1: Don’t make stuff up,” he tells them. “Rule No. 2: When people beg, and say, ‘Oh, the consequences are so important,’ and when they say, ‘You’re a terrible, terrible, terrible person if you don’t,’ just refer back to Rule No. 1. And we’ll be fine.”

He is sitting in a wood-and-leather chair in his Supreme Court chambers. He’s discussing originalism, the idea that the Constitution’s meaning is the same in 2019 as in 1788. “Our Founders deliberately chose a written constitution,” he says. “Its writtenness was important to them. They rejected the English tradition of an unwritten constitution, because they wanted to fix certain things.”

To treat the Constitution as a “living” document, he says, is to regard it “more or less as a relic,” something kept “in the back of the church behind a screen, and you look at it as you walk by, and you move on.” But that’s “not what ‘We the People’ agreed to,” he adds. “We didn’t say five judges—or nine, or whatever—sitting in Washington get to govern 330 million people. Who would write such a thing down? Who would agree to that? That’s not a republic. I don’t know what that is, but it’s not a republic. Not a democracy.”

In his new book, “A Republic, if You Can Keep It”—a mix of speeches, reflections and excerpts from his judicial opinions, to be published Sept. 10—Justice Gorsuch makes the case, he says, that “we should all be originalists.” Consider the alternative: “What happens when judges make it up?” he asks. “Strange things happen. You start losing rights, first of all, that are in the Constitution.”

He cites the Fourth Amendment’s ban on “unreasonable” searches. “At common law that pretty much meant, hey, you can’t go snooping around someone’s house—or the curtilage, the area around their house—without a warrant,” he says. Then, incredulous, he cites Florida v. Riley (1989), in which the justices “held that the police may, in a helicopter 400 feet above your house, hover and peer down without a warrant. They said that’s not even a search.”

Read more here.

Related Posts

  • Is Neil Gorsuch to Blame for the Supreme Court's Slow Pace?
  • Neil Gorsuch—Next Supreme Court Justice
  • Trump and the Supreme Court
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • Vast Manipulation of Mass Opinion in Democratic Society - February 1, 2023
  • The Man Who Tried to Prevent the Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster - January 30, 2023
  • Ukraine Front Lines Increasingly Bloody - January 30, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Paris, The Palace Hotels: Part I
  • Protection While Traveling in France
  • You Want the Limo, Not the Public Bus
  • A Cashless Society Is A Debacle for Americans
  • Is Rutin Useful in Preventing Blood Clots?
  • The Claremont Institute: Protecting the American Way of Life
  • Why Some Kids Won’t Go Back to School, Ever
  • Government Should Be Small, Laws Unobtrusive, and Men Left Alone
  • Your Survival Guy Prefers Bombardier’s Global Express 7500
  • Gold/Silver Coins No Longer Allowed in Safe Deposit Boxes

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Will Western Tanks Be a Game Changer in Ukraine?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Europe Should Protect Itself
  • “I Will Veto Everything They Send Me”
  • How to Fight Wokism Idiocy
  • US Debt Now Exceeds Annual GDP?
  • The Neocon Russia-Hoaxers of Hamilton 68 Must Be Held Accountable
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?
  • Pfizer CEO Terrified of Real Questions About His Vaccines

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More
  • What Happens if the “Fed Put” Is Over for Good?
  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You?
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Are the Realists Winning the Debate over the Future of EVs?
  • CATO: Global Freedom Is in Sharp Decline
  • Biden Administration Destroying Retiree Fiduciary Protections
  • 4 Life Changing Words for Your Survival Guy: “You Should Try This”
  • Suddenly, Holding Cash Looks Good Again to Many

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Survive and Thrive February 2023: 4 Life Changing Words: “You Should Try This”
  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You?
  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More
  • America’s Unprecedented Debt Problem
  • Iran’s Ballistic Missiles Could Give Russia the Edge in Ukraine
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?
  • Tactical Laser Weapon Achieves “First Light”
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Your Investment Focus Is the Foundation for Success

SEN. KENNEDY: This Is How to Fix Biden’s Border Disaster

Oh Yes! It Can Get Worse

Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More

Can Ukraine Be Solved the Way Kennedy Solved the Cuban Missile Crisis?

What If Russia Does Fall Apart?

Don’t Expect Much from the GOP House

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives