Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity and Vanguard Since 1971

Everyone Has Stopped Talking about Bolton. Now It Gets Dangerous.

April 18, 2018 By Justin Logan

A U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet aircraft assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 213 prepares to land on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), not shown, in the Persian Gulf Oct. 3, 2014, as the ship supports operations in Iraq and Syria. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Joshua Card, U.S. Navy/Released)

If you’d told me I’d live long enough to see John Bolton as U.S. National Security Adviser, I’d be both relieved and unnerved. Relieved because it could only mean that the United States was even more secure than I had thought: so abundantly safe from danger that a person as clownishly wrong as Bolton can fail upward, seemingly forever. Unnerved because even very secure nations become insecure again eventually, and John Bolton is just the man for the job.

The first thing you need to understand about John Bolton is that he is the anti-Clausewitz. Clausewitz’s famous dictum about war being the continuation of politics by other means ended with the admonition that “the political view is the object, war is the means, and the means must always include the object in our conception.” In Bolton’s view, war is a vehicle for annihilation–there is no residual politics.

His weaseling out of responsibility for pushing the Iraq war involves divesting himself, and the United States, of responsibility for Iraq’s postwar politics. In Bolton’s view, unless the wreckage the war produced “flow[ed] totally and unchangeably from the decision to overthrow Saddam alone,” it’s not his fault, and not an indictment of the decision.

It may be true that previously-unobserved faeries could have sprinkled pixie dust on the insurgency, dissolving it and turning Iraq into Shangri-la, but here on planet Earth, the decision to invade was the necessary condition for killing nearly 5,000 Americans and draining a trillion dollars from unborn Americans’ bank accounts. By Bolton’s logic, unless you can prove that Iraqi Shia would never have “decided to assassinate Saddam for all that he had done to repress the Shia and Iraq would have descended into chaos,” don’t come whining at him about the disaster the war produced. Bolton is a lawyer by training, and his style of argument here is a big part of why people hate lawyers.

It’s no coincidence, then, that one of his first projects in the White House has been to try to find an Arab force stupid enough to take the baton from the Americans in Syria. The man is an arsonist, not a firefighter.

John Bolton is going to try to start a war.

Out of deference to Bolton’s lawyerly logic, perhaps we should clarify: Bolton is going to push for America’s adversaries to abandon all their objectives while acceding to all of America’s demands, at threat of war. So, war. The question is where. I would bet on Iran.

The thing about Bolton is that although he is a maniacal hawk, he’s also a reasonably deft political operator. Take the account of Matthew Waxman, a Bush national security official, who “served the Bush administration in the Defense and State Departments, where I watched Bolton often run circles around rivals or chew them to pieces”:

First, he’s a masterful bureaucratic tactician… Similar to former Vice President Dick Cheney, he knows the levers and knobs of the vast national security and foreign policy machinery: how they work, who works them, and how to exert control over them…

Second, he’s a crafty negotiator… As U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Bolton is mostly remembered for his hostility to the institution and for his coarse bluntness. Yet in that multilateral diplomatic maze, he often delivered for the administration, including on North Korea at the U.N. Security Council…

Third, he’s thorough and methodical…

This is dangerous stuff. I’d add that as the recent head of a hawkish PAC, Bolton has a good sense of where the political energy is on GOP foreign policy, and would be well-positioned to coordinate with hawkish GOP money men, particularly so on Iran.

Moreover, the Bolton PAC’s relationship to Cambridge Analytica has riled up the New York Times’ readers, although probably for the wrong reasons. Whatever the content of the “behavioral targeting with psychographic messaging” Cambridge Analytica did for Bolton, what Bolton was probably up to was ingratiating himself with billionaire GOP donor Robert Mercer, who was an early funder and partisan of Cambridge Analytica.

While lots of wonks hate working rooms, Bolton knows, and does, the politics of foreign policy. With an arsenal of hawkish donors, an enervated State Department, and a mercurial president, this might just be Bolton’s moment.

And it’s probably both for ideological and bureaucratic reasons that Iran is the most likely target. Bolton has wanted to attack Iran for years, and while the same is true of North Korea and probably a number of other countries, Bolton likely sees that the support network for reneging on the Iran deal and getting back on a path to war is better than in North Korea or elsewhere. Moreover, the president himself appears to be sustaining a pro-diplomacy line with respect to North Korea, while he’s shown himself inclined to put pressure on analysts to support predetermined notions about Iran, as well as saying things that are flatly untrue.

According to a White House official, “Trump was ultimately drawn to Bolton, in part because he was impressed by his many appearances on Fox News.” As the media has moved on from Bolton to the various other shiny objects surrounding the Trump presidency, smart observers should keep an eye on Bolton, and on what he’s up to when it comes to Iran.

Related Posts

  • Rand Paul Gets It
  • Everyone has an Agenda
  • Dangerous Waters
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Justin Logan
Justin Logan is a contributing editor for RichardCYoung.com. Formerly the Cato Institute's director of foreign policy studies, Logan writes primarily about politics and American foreign policy. He holds a master’s degree in international relations from the University of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in international relations from American University. He is an expert on U.S. grand strategy, international relations theory, and American foreign policy. He has lectured on American strategy across the country and across the world, and his articles have appeared in International Security, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Foreign Policy, the National Interest, the Harvard International Review, Orbis, National Review, the American Conservative, Reason, Politico, and the American Prospect, among others. A native Missourian, Logan currently lives in Washington, DC with his wife and two sons, where they are opening a Latin American wine and spirits bar, Ruta del Vino.
Latest posts by Justin Logan (see all)
  • The Case for Zero-Based Strategy - December 4, 2018
  • Thinking About a Noninterventionist Political Alliance - October 29, 2018
  • The Iran Issue Is Not Going Away …and All of the Wrong People Are in Charge - September 25, 2018

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • Who’d be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • TOP HEAVY: Focus on Big Indexing Could Cause Market Chaos
  • Yes! Money Can Bring You Happiness
  • Yes, Your Children Are Listening to You
  • Americans Fleeing High Tax States for Growth Corridors
  • The Armed American Family: Part I
  • Florida: Enjoy Certain Freedoms and Individual Liberties
  • ACTRESS: “Liberal Politicians Are Ruining Cities”

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Too Late to Reform?
  • MAJOR ENDORSEMENT: Tucker Carlson Endorses Donald Trump
  • Who Can’t Afford to Live in NYC
  • Your Key to Retirement Wealth
  • Don't Make Moves You Might Regret
  • Can China Save Itself from a Debt Collapse?
  • Private Jets Stranded in Munich
  • Mob Rule vs Deterrence
  • What If the Warmongers Weren’t in Charge?
  • Stop America's Zombie Apocalypse before It Starts

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Investing Habits of the Fairly Wealthy: #2 Coach
  • Digital Dollars: A Warning Where You’re the Prey
  • Panama Canal Traffic Jam Could Soon Affect Global Energy Markets
  • Signs the Job Market Is Weakening
  • Don’t Make Moves You Might Regret
  • Ruling: Major Egg Producers Conspired to Drive Up Prices
  • Can China Save Itself from a Debt Collapse?
  • Companies Scoop up Truck Terminals at Yellow’s Bankruptcy Auction
  • Your Key to Retirement Wealth
  • New EV Rules Leave Wiggle Room for Chinese Suppliers

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Investing Habits of the Fairly Wealthy: #2 Coach
  • Have All of New Jersey’s Workers Already Moved to Florida?
  • Georgia Accelerates Implementation of Its Flat Tax Plan
  • Digital Dollars: A Warning Where You’re the Prey
  • You Can See Where Big Government Is Headed
  • You Can’t Escape a Digital Dollar
  • Don’t Make Moves You Might Regret
  • Listen to What They Say about YOUR Money
  • Is It Almost Riot Season Again in America?
  • Your Key to Retirement Wealth

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Five Year Treasury Yield

“The Economy Is Buried Under Trillions in Debt”

Lack of Demand for EVs

Wellesley Fund: “Balanced Investing Is Dead” (Please Stop)

Biden Border Crisis Is a National Security Threat

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives