Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Thinking About a Noninterventionist Political Alliance

October 29, 2018 By Justin Logan

By Nadin3d @ Shutterstock.com

Last month, Stephen Walt suggested that non- or less-interventionist people on the Right and the Left should get together to ally against the interventionist consensus. Walt rightly suggests this would be tough, and points to three main obstacles: the lack of a deep bench of personnel who could staff a restraint-minded presidential administration; internecine squabbles on policy, both foreign and domestic, within this coalition; and special interests unduly influencing Congressional foreign policymaking.

I think all of Walt’s problems are serious and worth taking up in more detail. At a moment when I’m more optimistic than I’ve ever been about the prospects of foreign policy change, it’s important to start smashing the obstacles to that change.

I’m most sanguine about Walt’s first worry. There is an effort already underway to develop a bigger network of writers, thinkers, and operators. Organizations worth mentioning here include the John Quincy Adams Society, active on college campuses both promoting realist ideas and identifying and cultivating students who may be able to contribute going forward. Defense Priorities is doing a good job of producing large volumes of opinion pieces and media hits that are readily consumable by both Congress and lay people. Efforts to develop networks among people already in Congress are by definition more off-the-radar, but my understanding is that things there are better than they were five years ago.

What’s important here is not so much the quality of the marginal op-ed or even the topline number of people working on these issues. It’s the sense that working toward restraint is a viable career path that non-crazy people can set out on. For decades, neoconservatism has been a career, as Scott McConnell has noted. In other words, with the next presidential election two years away, and with the neocons at least partly cowed by the disasters they wrought and disarray in their ranks, if present trends continue on the talent-development front, I’m not as worried about the butts-in-chairs problem.

By contrast, I worry a lot about internecine squabbles within the coalition. Restraint-minded people include Latin Mass Catholics, actual socialists, tweedy, above-it-all academic realists, stinky hippies, goldbug libertarians, and an array of other groups, making it a veritable clown car of disarray. With a political climate in which every issue is treated as Determining the Fate of the Republic, how will this group hold together? Would it have been sustainable in the midst of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings? In light of the disputed nature of the Caravan? The group contains actual pro-lifers—are the academics and the hippies going to be able to handle that?

The contrast that needs to be drawn here is with the coalition behind the bipartisan consensus. These people agree about most things. This is true not just on foreign policy, but on most non-foreign policy issues. Yes, they may quarrel over whether interest rates should go another 250 basis points, or whether charter schools are on balance beneficial, but to the extent these disagreements happen, a) they don’t impede cooperation, and b) you don’t hear about them that much, likely because they’re on issues that are both wonky and seen as less hysterical than culture war or other issues.

I don’t have well-formed views on how to cross this bridge, but for political purposes it may be best in the long term to have two establishments, one on the right and one on the left, with differing emphases, so that they can argue about tactics and implementation while remaining on the same broader outlook. In the meantime, however, there aren’t enough of us out there to staff two establishments, so I’d suggest more thought is due on this issue.

The special interests issue is tough, considering the academic research shows that lobbying (and similar efforts) are most effective when they’re defending the status quo. What may be more effective than trying to stand up new pressure groups would be identifying existing groups with influence that could be used in a campaign against the American imperium. Conservative anti-tax (and by extension, spending) groups like Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform, health care providers and pressure groups looking for more public money, education groups (teacher’s unions?), the Friends Committee on National Legislation (Quakers) and other religious groups, and an array of lobbies and organizations. They could be given more money to convince them to be more active on war and military spending without having to build from the bottom up organizations and figure out who to talk to on Capitol Hill.

Even squaring up to the obstacles, though, it’s a much better time to be a realist/restrainer in DC than it was five or 10 years ago. And to that, we should all be raising a glass.

Related Posts

  • “Aleppo Moments” and Libertarian Foreign Policy
  • Toward a Libertarian Foreign Policy
  • Switzerland’s Foreign Policy
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Justin Logan
Justin Logan is a contributing editor for RichardCYoung.com. Formerly the Cato Institute's director of foreign policy studies, Logan writes primarily about politics and American foreign policy. He holds a master’s degree in international relations from the University of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in international relations from American University. He is an expert on U.S. grand strategy, international relations theory, and American foreign policy. He has lectured on American strategy across the country and across the world, and his articles have appeared in International Security, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Foreign Policy, the National Interest, the Harvard International Review, Orbis, National Review, the American Conservative, Reason, Politico, and the American Prospect, among others. A native Missourian, Logan currently lives in Washington, DC with his wife and two sons, where they are opening a Latin American wine and spirits bar, Ruta del Vino.
Latest posts by Justin Logan (see all)
  • The Case for Zero-Based Strategy - December 4, 2018
  • Thinking About a Noninterventionist Political Alliance - October 29, 2018
  • The Iran Issue Is Not Going Away …and All of the Wrong People Are in Charge - September 25, 2018

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • ENERGY FREEDOM ACT: Ted Cruz Introduces Bill for Energy Independence
  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be
  • Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding
  • A Look at the Future of Main Street America
  • Government Should Be Small, Laws Unobtrusive, and Men Left Alone
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • YOU DESERVE FREEDOM: Your Hard Work Will Make It Happen
  • WAR HAS BEGUN: What Advice Are You Giving Your Loved Ones?
  • Your Sheriff Can Thwart Federal Gun Control Efforts
  • How Can You Maximize Natural Immunity to Viruses?

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Washington Is the Systemic Risk
  • Matt Taibbi Exposes the "Censorship-Industrial Complex"
  • “Will We Have Enough to Live On Forever?”
  • SVB – There’s Panic in the Air
  • The Education of Barney Frank
  • MASKS: "No Measurable Difference in Outcome"
  • Coal Is Keeping the Lights On
  • WORKING OVERTIME: The COVID Propaganda Machine
  • Silicon Valley Bank: What Do Investors Expect?
  • How about Hiring Erik Prince to Crush the Drug Cartels?

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability?
  • Mortgage Market Not Expected to Settle Down Soon
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • Were Silicon Valley Bank’s Motivations for Taking Losses Pure?
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Major Rail Merger Gets Approval
  • The Education of Barney Frank
  • Credit Suisse Announced “Material Weaknesses” In Its Internal Controls

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Be Wary of Those Who Wrap Themselves in Capes
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • ESG: Are Markets Ready for “A Needed Dose of Reality?”
  • Was Silicon Valley Bank a Victim of ESG?
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • March RAGE Gauge: Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Gretchen Whitmer Reviving Forced Unionization in Michigan
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • How the Rich Get Richer: You Invest, They Win

Pushing Back at ESG

Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West

Greetings from Key West

Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver

For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?

Are You Prepared to Run Out of Water?

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives