Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Should the Afghan War Be Privatized?

February 4, 2019 By The Editors

U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo visits troops in Kabul, Afghanistan on July 9, 2018. [State Department photo/ Public Domain]

President Trump seems increasingly intent on fulfilling his campaign promise to end American involvement in Afghanistan. An informal adviser to the President’s campaign, Erik Prince (founder of the security contractor formerly known as Blackwater, and current chairman of Frontier Services) has a plan that could replace U.S. government forces in Afghanistan with private security. Prince promises lower costs and better results. At The Washington Post, Karen DeYoung, Shane Harris and Dan Lamothe report:

Prince first brought his proposal to the White House early last year, reportedly with the backing of Trump’s then-adviser Stephen K. Bannon. It was quickly rejected by Mattis and then-national security adviser H.R. McMaster, who were pushing for a plan, ultimately approved by Trump, to increase U.S. forces.

Trump “was close to making a decision in our favor last year” and was reluctant about the McMaster strategy, Prince said in an August interview with the Hill newspaper. “And so now that the anniversary [of the new strategy] is coming up yet again . . . the question is, does [Trump] default to the same failed policies of the last 17 years, or does he exercise civilian leadership of the military and go to a sustainable path?”

Bannon is now gone from the White House, but so is McMaster and former secretary of state Rex Tillerson, who joined Mattis in trying to shut the door permanently on Prince.

Prince’s appearance last week in Afghanistan came as the new top U.S. officer there, Gen. Scott Miller, began carrying out an informal review of the U.S. mission. The Pentagon is not expected to recommend major changes to the strategy adopted last year, which moderately increased the number of U.S. troops to more than 14,000, loosened restrictions on airstrikes and called for a stricter stance toward neighboring Pakistan’s alleged support for terrorism and provision of sanctuaries to the Taliban.

In recent months, the administration has pressed for reconciliation with the Taliban, sending senior officials to meet with their representatives in Qatar and appointing veteran diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad, the former U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, as its special envoy tasked with jump-starting talks between the militants and the Afghan government.

Among others during his visit, according to several officials and informed individuals in Kabul, Prince met with Ghani’s current and former intelligence chiefs, the current interior minister and his deputy, as well as a number of senior officials, some of whom left government in disputes with Ghani.

In a lengthy interview last week on Afghanistan’s Tolo TV, Prince sharply criticized U.S. strategy, particularly the frequent rotation of American units, as well as what he described as the use of conventional tactics against an unconventional enemy and the lack of dependable air cover. Instead, he outlined a contractor force of about 6,000, drawn from former U.S. and European special forces, 3,600 of whom would be designated as “adjuncts” to Afghan units on the ground, serving under Afghan rules of engagement.

If the contractors did something wrong, he said, they should be prosecuted under American military law. Prince took sharp exception to the Tolo interviewer’s description of the contractors as “mercenaries,” saying they would not count as such under an unspecified “United Nations definition.”

Prince has put the cost of his plan, which he has said would leave about 2,000 U.S. Special Operations troops on the ground and utilize contractor aircraft, at about $5 billion a year. Within six months, he told Tolo, “you would have a very different situation on the ground. I will commit to that.”

Read more here.

Related Posts

  • The Afghanistan War is “Another No Win Situation”
  • Has Congress Forgotten Afghanistan?
  • Rick Perry: War Dog
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • Making America Great Again Is What America Wants - March 20, 2023
  • Is Plant-Based Meat Unhealthy and Harmful to the Environment? - March 17, 2023
  • SPIES ON CAMPUS: The Chinese Have Invaded the Quad - March 16, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Protection While Traveling in France
  • America’s States Rights Revolution
  • America’s Silent Army with 423M Guns
  • Boom—Your Life Changes
  • Government Should Be Small, Laws Unobtrusive, and Men Left Alone
  • Victor Davis Hanson: How to Bust DC’s Stronghold
  • What a Way to Make a Living: New Hampshire #1
  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be
  • California’s Progressive Liberals Have Created a Monster
  • My Battle-Hardened Stock Market Strategy for the Worst of Times

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Pushing Back at ESG
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Biden Has Lost Control of the Northern Border Too
  • Who'd be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?
  • Get Well Soon Taki
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • SPIES ON CAMPUS: The Chinese Have Invaded the Quad
  • Washington Is the Systemic Risk

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Treasury Studying How to Increase Deposit Insurance
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability?
  • Mortgage Market Not Expected to Settle Down Soon
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • Were Silicon Valley Bank’s Motivations for Taking Losses Pure?
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Major Rail Merger Gets Approval

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • How Long Is Your Water Supply Chain?
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Be Wary of Those Who Wrap Themselves in Capes
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • ESG: Are Markets Ready for “A Needed Dose of Reality?”
  • Was Silicon Valley Bank a Victim of ESG?
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • March RAGE Gauge: Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Gretchen Whitmer Reviving Forced Unionization in Michigan

Who’d be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?

Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening

Get Well Soon Taki

A Cashless Society Is A Debacle for Americans

How about Hiring Erik Prince to Crush the Drug Cartels?

Key West’s Best Burger

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives