Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • Critical Race Theory
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money

Democratic Candidates Forced to Resort to “Wealth Inequality”

August 21, 2019 By Debbie Young

National Guardmembers “have met the ultimate definition of what it means to be a Citizen-Soldier,” Vice President Joe Biden said during a reception for the National Guard adjutants general of the states and territories of the United States at the Vice President’s Residence in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 22, 2010. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Jim Greenhill) (Released)

Wages are rising. Jobs are plentiful. Poverty is falling. So what’s a Democrat presidential candidate running against President Trump to do? Come forward with an economic line of attack that focuses on wealth inequality.

Our friend Chris Edwards, an economist at the Cato Institute, acknowledges that wealth inequality has risen in recent years, but, he counters, by far less than Democrats imply.

  • Senator Bernie Sanders claims that there has been a “massive transfer of wealth from the middle class to the top one percent.”
  • Senator Elizabeth Warren lambastes America’s “extreme concentration of wealth.”
  • Joe Biden laments, “This wealth gap that exists in the United States of America is so profound now.”

Flawed Data Fuels Faux Inequality Claims

The scarier claims about inequality usually stem from the flawed data created by French economist Thomas Piketty and his colleagues. More careful studies by other economists and the Federal Reserve Board reveal surprisingly modest changes in wealth inequality given the huge revolutions in globalization and technology that have occurred.

Increases in Wealth Inequality as Bad as Democrats Claim?

Not if you are providing free phone service for 1.5 billion users globally, Chris Edwards argues in NRO.

Much of the recent modest rise in wealth inequality stems from innovations in our economy that are pulling everyone up. Brian Acton and Jan Koum, for example, built huge multibillion-dollar fortunes by creating WhatsApp, which provides free phone service for 1.5 billion users globally.

Acton and Koum’s success may have increased the wealth owned by the top 1 percent, but their product has created massive consumer value as well. Most of the wealthiest Americans are entrepreneurs who have fueled economic growth, which is clear in examining the Forbes 400 list. Wealth created this way is not the zero-sum struggle that Democrats imagine it is.

The Bigger the Welfare State, the More Inequality

A study by Credit Suisse found: “Strong social security programs — good public pensions, free higher education or generous student loans, unemployment and health insurance — can greatly reduce the need for personal financial assets. . . . This is one explanation for the high level of wealth inequality we identify in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: the top groups continue to accumulate for business and investment purposes, while the middle and lower classes have a less pressing need for personal saving.”

That is why it is absurd for politicians such as Sanders and Warren to decry wealth inequality and then turn around and demand European-style expansions in our social programs.

Chris Offers a Solution: Transition to Savings-Based Social Program

Numerous countries have Social Security systems based on private savings accounts. Chile has unemployment-insurance savings accounts. Martin Feldstein proposed a savings-based approach to Medicare. The assets in such savings accounts would be inheritable, unlike the benefits from current U.S. social programs.

Sanders and Warren are right to criticize crony capitalism as a cause of wealth inequality. But their big government approaches to social policy would have the opposite effect on wealth inequality than what they may believe.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Democratic Candidates Looked Just as Bored as Viewers
  • Democratic Bench
  • President Trump vs. Kaepernick, Black Lives Matter, Democratic Candidates
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie, editor-in-chief of Richardcyoung.com, has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over three decades. When not in Key West, Debbie spends her free time researching and writing in and about Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving her Porsche Boxter S through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • Saudi Oil Is Different from U.S. Oil? - June 27, 2022
  • Greetings From Paris & Le Bristol Hotel - June 24, 2022
  • Biden, a Job Killing Machine - June 24, 2022

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Boom—Your Life Changes
  • Democracy & Diversity: Not In the Constitution
  • The Simple, Elegant Power of the Retirement Compounders
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France
  • Your Best State on Guns, Plus the 8th Wonder of the World
  • “I’ve Got Guys Buying Guns/Ammo for Me All Through the Night.”
  • CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY: Alabama Becomes 22nd Permitless Carry State
  • BEYOND RUSSIA: America Strengthens India Ties to Counter China
  • Richard Feynman Solved the Space Shuttle Disaster Mystery
  • A NEW CONTRACT WITH AMERICA: Rick Scott Finally Gives the GOP Something to Run On

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Paris: How Hotel Lutetia Can Challenge Le Bristol Hotel?
  • Biden Running Out of People to Blame for High Gas Prices
  • RECESSION? Dow 25,000, $8 Gas, Rising Interest Rates, Spell Mid-term Crack Up
  • Here's Why the Fed Won't Raise Rates Enough
  • GOP Voters Want Republicans Who Will Actually Fight for Their Values
  • MONEY TALKS: The Best Service in Paris
  • Are Democrats Ditching President Biden?
  • One Surprising Thing You Should Know About Private Jets
  • The Lives of Others
  • 1st Time Elon Musk Votes Republican

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • What Happens to Your Passwords When You Die?
  • Your Survival Guy: Clearing the Decks, Buying a Boat, Seeing the World and More
  • Is the Great Job Boom Over?
  • Here’s Why You Need a 15-Year Retirement Investment Plan
  • Will ESG Do to Steel Prices What It Did to Gas Prices?
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan
  • Apple Shares Resilient in the Face of Recession
  • MONEY TALKS: The Best Service in Paris
  • Predictions of MEGA-SPENDING on Metaverse

Saudi Oil Is Different from U.S. Oil?

Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”

The Magic of Compound Interest

FOOD SHORTAGE: Not “If,” But “How Bad?”

The Great Reset and the COVID Coup D’etat

U.S. Survival AR-7

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives