It comes as no surprise that Texas has four of the top 15 aspirational cities. As Joel Kotkin and Wendell Cox point out, Aspirational Cities appeal to blue-state progressives by using red-state economic policies.
Finally, we considered quality-of-life factors such as traffic congestion, housing affordability, and crowding—which are keenly relevant to young families hunting for the places with the best “inventory of the possible.” In a sense, we believe aspirational cities reflect a kind of urban arbitrage, where people look for those places that provide not just economic and cultural opportunity but a cost structure that allows them to enjoy their success to the fullest extent.
Our top two cities reflect the importance of this arbitrage opportunity. Both No. 1, Austin, Texas, and No. 2, New Orleans, are places where people can enjoy the cultural amenities and attitudes of “progressive” blue states but in a distinctly red-state environment of low costs, less regulation, and lower taxes. These places have lured companies and people from more expensive regions, notably California and the Northeast, by being not only culturally rich but also amenable to building a career, buying a home and, ultimately, raising a family in relative comfort.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy (see all)
- A Cyber-attack Didn’t Take Down Venezuela’s Power Grid, Socialism Did - March 18, 2019
- The 16 States With Constitutional Carry - March 15, 2019
- Dick’s Sporting Goods’ Slow Divorce with American Gun Owners - March 14, 2019