Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • World Gold Mine Production

Impeachment – a Political Remedy, Not a Legal One

October 25, 2019 By Debbie Young

President Donald J. Trump meets with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Congressional leadership Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2019, in the Cabinet Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Originally posted on October 21, 2019.

If Trump’s missteps warrant an impeachable offense, why are Democrats not voting to conduct the impeachment inquiry? Why are they not proudly holding hearings in public with due process, rather than behind closed doors with selective leaking?

In Andrew McCarthy’s book, Faithless Execution, he deals with the thesis that because the Framers feared an agglomeration of power in the presidency they were creating, they endowed Congress with significant checks on the executive. “The ultimate one was impeachment,” which was to be reserved for truly abominable misconduct.

(The Framers) understood that governance would involve tussles between the political branches and episodes of overreach — whether out of incompetence, malevolence, or urgency — for which the extraordinary impeachment remedy would be gross overkill. Routine disputes involving the propensities of both the legislature and the executive to act outside their authorities would be handled by lesser remedies. Congress, most importantly, was given the power of the purse and significant power over executive agencies (to create them, to limit their authority, and, in the Senate’s case, to approve their leaders).

Mr. McCarthy argues in Faithless Execution that this system has broken down, and he fears there are no repairs on the horizon.

The Framers naturally thought congressional control of the executive budget would obviate the need to resort to impeachment. Lawmakers could defund dubious executive initiatives and withhold funds necessary to carry out the president’s priorities; this would pressure the executive branch to comply with statutes as well as congressional demands for information and policy modification. The ultimate question of a president’s fitness would be left to the sovereign — the American people, exercising the franchise.

With Donald Trump in office and impeachment in play, that adage is repeated so often it seems platitudinous. But it states a vital truth: The mere existence of misconduct that the House might judge impeachable does not mean the Senate — by a two-thirds supermajority — would remove a president over it. That fact, coupled with the inherent societal discord impeachment is bound to cause, has historically discouraged the House from commencing impeachment inquiries, even for arguably impeachable offenses.

The upshot is that impeachment can never be successfully invoked — in the sense of both filing articles of impeachment and ousting the president from power — absent a public consensus, cutting across partisan lines, that a president needs to be removed. Only such a consensus would move members of the House and Senate, who must face voters. Therefore, a public political case has to be made for impeachment. It is not enough to show that a president has overstepped here or there. The public must be convinced that these excesses are so serious, so indicative of unfitness, that it is worth putting the country through the trauma of removing the chief executive.

Impeachment – the Ultimate Power

Moreover, we are just one year out from an election in which, if Trump is as bad as Democrats say, the voters will remove him. Yet, Trump’s approval rating hovers at around 43 percent, close to what Obama’s was a year before his reelection. Trump could certainly lose, but he stands a decent chance of being reelected. Hence far from a strong consensus for his removal, there will be zealous protest against impeachment by a significant segment of the public.

Consequently, the Republican-controlled Senate will swiftly reject the House Democrats’ impeachment articles as a partisan stunt — as precisely the abuse of power the Framers feared. And woe betide the next Democrat president seeking the bipartisan cooperation needed to govern.

A Gross Imbalance in the Political Branches

Our constitutional system will be damaged because impeachment will be discredited. That will not make it any less indispensable than Madison judged it to be. Yet its invocation will be even less likely in some grievous future instance, when a presidential abuse of power actually does imperil the nation. We will have a virtually omnipotent president. As a practical matter, there will be no viable congressional check — no impeachment, no power of the purse — to rein the president in. The powers of the competing political branches will be in gross imbalance, making functional separation of powers impossible.

As the Framers would tell us, that is not a prescription for the preservation of liberty.

More from Andrew McCarthy here.

Andrew C. McCarthy: Faithless Execution: Building a Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Impeachment – a Simple Way to Discredit Trump?
  • Impeachment – What Is the Underlying Crime?
  • The Impeachment Shop of Horrors
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie, editor-in-chief of Richardcyoung.com, has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over five decades. When not in Key West, Debbie spends her free time researching and writing in and about Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving her Porsche Boxter S through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • Auto Profitability Colliding with Low Emissions - June 1, 2023
  • The Party Is Going Off the Rails - May 31, 2023
  • Commemorating Memorial Day - May 30, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Rich States, Poor States this State is Dominant Once Again
  • Does Big Government Create Poverty?
  • CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY: Alabama Becomes 22nd Permitless Carry State
  • The Common Ground of Democracy is Sinking Beneath Americans’ Feet
  • Who Is Alex Jones?
  • America’s Number One Patriot: Naples Florida’s Alfie Oakes
  • Your Cash Swept into Your Broker’s Bank Account!
  • Warning! Your Survival Guy’s on a Boil Water Advisory
  • Your Odds with Statins: 500 to 1?
  • The Forgotten America

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Joe Biden’s Death Warrant for Fossil Fuel Plants
  • Stossel Says DeSantis Is "Smarter and Better than Biden."
  • America’s Favorite Wordsmith Needs Tutoring
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Will Anyone from the FBI Be Held Accountable for the Russiagate Hoax?
  • Pushing the Envelope Too Far
  • Preserving Liberty Through Homeschooling
  • The Party Is Going Off the Rails
  • Commemorating Memorial Day
  • What Does That Have to Do with Your Dividend?

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Happy Memorial Day!
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Money Market Assets Hit Record High: $5.4 Trillion
  • A Three-Week International Research Trip to Paris via Rome
  • The Mania in AI Stocks Has Arrived
  • What Does That Have to Do with Your Dividend?
  • The Wisdom of Sam Zell
  • How Activists Have Weaponized Corporate Boards
  • Is an Investment Property Disaster Looming?

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Survive and Thrive June 2023: Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Social Security: Declining Italy Needs a Bambino Boom
  • ATTACK ON THE IVAN KHURS: Unmanned Vessels Changing Naval Warfare
  • The Future of the American City is This…
  • Happy Memorial Day: Your Survival Guy: Proud To Be an American
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Insurers Now Fleeing the Net Zero Insurance Alliance
  • A Three-Week International Research Trip to Paris via Rome

Auto Profitability Colliding with Low Emissions

Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era

What Binds the Woke Left Together?

Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes, America’s Food Kings

The Party Is Going Off the Rails

Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives