Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • Critical Race Theory
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money

Imagine the Precedent of Banning Things Every Time They Are Misused

June 10, 2022 By Richard C. Young

Police firearms training with AR-15 at shooting range.

By Jonathan C Wear @ Shutterstock.com

After explaining the long history of the AR-15, Peter Suciu asks readers of Spectator World to “Imagine the precedent of banning things every time they are misused.” Suciu also scuttles any attempt to equate AR-15s to “weapons of war.” He writes:

After the Second World War, due to the huge number of surplus firearms, there was a market for so-called “sporterized” rifles, which literally transformed what had been carried by soldiers into civilian rifles. That’s why any talk of “weapons of war” is misleading; those lines have long been blurred.

In fact, throughout much of the history of the United States, military rifles and civilian rifles were largely one and the same. Colt, Winchester, Sharps, and so on all sought military contracts while offering their products to civilians. In contrast to President Biden’s claims that there were always weapons civilians couldn’t buy — including cannons — that was not true. Civilians could and did buy the same guns as the military. That only changed with the passage of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA), which placed restrictions on certain weapons, including machine guns. But the law never technically “banned” them. That is an important fact to consider, since it wasn’t until the passage of the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA) in 1986 that the production of new machine guns was banned.

Therefore, even today, residents in some thirty-seven states can still go through a complex background check process to legally purchase/transfer a machine gun (provided it was manufactured prior to FOPA) and other NFA weapons (such as suppressors, otherwise known as “silencers”).

All of this is necessary to understand, because what Colt did in the 1960s was offer a civilian model of the AR-15 to consumers. Yet it differed from the military’s M-16 in a crucial feature. The M-16 was designed to offer select fire. Originally, this included a fully automatic mode, which meant it would fire as long as the trigger was pulled. Later, due to accuracy issues, it was switched to a “three-round burst,” in which three rounds fire with each trigger pull. It also offered a semi-automatic mode, where one pull of the trigger fired a single shot.

The AR-15 only offers the semi-automatic option; it is therefore not a fully automatic weapon and shouldn’t be seen as comparable to a “machine gun.” Yet some, including General Eaton, have suggested that there is little difference between the M-16 and AR-15. Few soldiers would want to head into close-quarters combat limited to single-fire shots when the enemy has full-auto or burst fire capabilities.

Today there are calls to ban the AR-15 because it has been used in a few high-profile incidents. If shootings continue with other firearms, then advocates will simply suggest those guns should be banned as well. Imagine the precedent of banning things every time they are misused.

More than 22.8 million AR-15s have been sold in America to date. This fact needs to be put in perspective, as only a mere fraction of the millions in private ownership have ever been used for nefarious purposes. That is akin to calling for a ban on all automobiles because of drunk drivers, or suggesting that because of the rare plane crash, air travel is somehow unsafe and should be stopped.

Evil people will always find a way to do bad things, but banning a product used safely by tens of millions hardly seems to be the way to stop them.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Clinton Slams the Second Amendment
  • The Truth About the Second Amendment
  • Clinton Against Second Amendment
  • Second Amendment Sanctuaries
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • 10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights - June 28, 2022
  • Oil Demand Increasing Despite Growth in Renewables - June 28, 2022
  • Why Is the USDA Burying the Facts on Low-Carb Diets? - June 28, 2022

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Conflict Between Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Progressivism (Globalism)
  • What to Do about China?
  • Boom—Your Life Changes
  • FARM AMERICA: New York City’s Finest Cheesemongers
  • Joel Salatin: Meet the Real Mr. America
  • Protection While Traveling in France
  • Why Black Lives Matter Needs to Be Shut Down
  • Being Fully American Means Americans First
  • Robo-Advisors: When You Have a Lot More to Lose than Money
  • Tom Brady Is Proof You Shouldn’t Retire if You Still Love Your Work

Our Most Popular Posts

  • FOOD SHORTAGE: Not "If," But "How Bad?"
  • One Surprising Thing You Should Know About Private Jets
  • Paris: How Hotel Lutetia Can Challenge Le Bristol Hotel?
  • The Most Controversial Restaurant in Paris?
  • Saudi Oil Is Different from U.S. Oil?
  • Biden Running Out of People to Blame for High Gas Prices
  • FLORIDA DODGED A BULLET: Elected Superb DeSantis Over Unstable Gillum
  • Good News for the 2nd Amendment
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • RECESSION? Dow 25,000, $8 Gas, Rising Interest Rates, Spell Mid-term Crack Up

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Why Work When Taxes Take It All?
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • What Happens to Your Passwords When You Die?
  • Your Survival Guy: Clearing the Decks, Buying a Boat, Seeing the World and More
  • Is the Great Job Boom Over?
  • Here’s Why You Need a 15-Year Retirement Investment Plan
  • Will ESG Do to Steel Prices What It Did to Gas Prices?
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan
  • Apple Shares Resilient in the Face of Recession
  • MONEY TALKS: The Best Service in Paris

10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights

What Just Happened? Fixing Its Historic Mistake

Why Work When Taxes Take It All?

Oil Demand Increasing Despite Growth in Renewables

Why Is the USDA Burying the Facts on Low-Carb Diets?

These Normal Household Products Could Disrupt Your Endocrine System

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives