Richardcyoung.com

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin & Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity & Wellington Since 1971
  • Hillsdale College
  • Babson College
  • Contact Us

The U.S. Cannot Fight A Large Land War

September 11, 2019 By Richard C. Young

U.S. Marines with Alpha Company, 1st Tank Battalion, 1st Marine Division ride in an M1A1 Abrams tank to their objective during exercise Gold Eagle 2013 at the Mount Bundey Training Area, Northern Territory, Australia, Sept. 14, 2013. (DoD photo by Sgt. Sarah Fiocco, U.S. Marine Corps/Released)

Fred Reed, writing at the Unz Review, explains that, as militaries sit unused, they deteriorate, and that commanders who join in peacetime are rarely prepared to contemplate a major war breaking out in their tenure. Perhaps most insightfully, Reed notes that wars rarely turn out at their end as they were expected to at their beginning.

Most ominously, Reed warns that America’s military is so focused on funding new weapons systems, that there are few spare parts or munitions to be had if a real war did break out. And, Reed theorizes that America cannot fight a large land war because conscription would be required, and “The public would not stand for it.” He writes (abridged):

For a couple of decades, I covered the military for various publications, as for example the Washington Times and Harper’s, and wrote a military column for Universal Press Syndicate.

The military beat was a great gig, letting you fly in fighter planes and sink in submarines. But if you take the study seriously, as I did, you learn interesting things. Such as that a war with a real country, such as Russia, China, or even Iran, would be a fool’s adventure. A few points:

The US fleet has not been in a war since 1945, the air forces since 1975. nor the Army in a hard fight since Vietnam. Bombing defenseless peasants, the chief function of the American military, is not war.

In extended periods of peace, which includes the bombing of peasants, a military tends to assume that no major war will come during the careers of those now in uniform. Commanders consequently do what makes their lives easy, what they must do to get through the day and have reasonable fitness reports.

This does not include pointing out inadequacies of training or equipment. Nor does it include recommending large expenditures to remedy deficiencies. Nor does it include recommending very expensive mobilization exercises that would divert money from new weapons.

The United States cannot fight a large land war, as for example against Russia, China, or Iran. Such a war would require conscription. The public would not stand for it. America no longer enjoys the sort of patriotic unity that it did at the beginning of the war against Vietnam. It will not accept heavy casualties.

People today are far more willing to disobey the federal government.

Being in a real war is hard on equipment. There are battle damage and heavy wear and tear. This doesn’t matter in the wars today’s military fights. America cannot really lose, only be worn down and leave. If the US “loses” in Afghanistan or Syria, it won’t matter to Americans and few will even notice. Because America always fights from well-protected bases and airfields, it can afford to use weapons that require a lot of maintenance, often including high-tech work. In a real war, no.

How Wars Turn Out

Typically, not as planned. I’ve said this before, but it is worth repeating. Look at history:

The American Civil War was supposed to last a day at First Manassas; wrong by four years and 650,000 dead. Napoleon thought his attack on Russia would end with the French in Moscow, not the Russians in Paris–which is what happened. WWI was supposed to last weeks and be a war of movement; wrong by four bloody years of trench warfare. The Japanese Army did not expect WWII to end with GIs buying their daughters drinks in Tokyo, nor the Germans that it would end with the Russian infantry in Berlin. The Americans did not think they would lose in Vietnam, nor the Russians that they would lose in Afghanistan. And so on.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • The War for Trump's Foreign Policy
  • The U.S. Shouldn't Fight another War for Oil it Doesn't Need
  • Craving War Like Bibi
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Richard C. Young
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • What Is Tim Walz’s Connection to China? - June 30, 2025
  • Trump and the Empire - June 27, 2025
  • Trump’s Beloved NYC Could Elect “A 100% Communist Lunatic” - June 26, 2025

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • “I’m Having Major Surgery Tomorrow,” He Said
  • What’s John Kerry Doing in Mexico?
  • A Cashless Society Is A Debacle for Americans
  • The Clock is Ticking: You Must Protect Your Family
  • CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY: Alabama Becomes 22nd Permitless Carry State
  • The Simple, Elegant Power of the Retirement Compounders
  • Why Investors Should Forget Prices and Focus on Income
  • FARM AMERICA: New York City’s Finest Cheesemongers
  • Conflict Between Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Progressivism (Globalism)
  • Your Sheriff Is Your Friend

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Donald Trump’s “Faithful Execution of Law”
  • Iran’s Lost Advantage
  • How Was the Trip?
  • “Off the Table”
  • Democrat Party Blinded by Hate
  • RIP Fred Smith
  • Smartphone Satellite Communications Are Here
  • Oil Shock? Not So Much
  • Who Wants War with Iran? Not the American People
  • Two and Half Days to a Bomb?

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Work to Retirement #11: Whatcha Gonna Do?
  • Canada Rescinds Tech Tax, Resumes Trade Talks with U.S.
  • US Investment Gap Narrows in Q1
  • Why the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Could Fix America’s Broken Grid
  • Smartphone Satellite Communications Are Here
  • Income Falls as Government Cuts Welfare Spending
  • US and China Finalize Rare Earth Trade Deal
  • GPS Jamming Disrupts Strait of Hormuz Despite Ceasefire
  • Could Blue Blob New York City Get a Lot Worse?
  • Economic Fundamentals Show Stability Beneath GDP Decline

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Every Family Should Own at Least One Shotgun: Here Are Three
  • What’s the Best Gun for Home Defense?
  • Work to Retirement #11: Whatcha Gonna Do?
  • Smartphone Satellite Communications Are Here
  • What’s Your Backup Internet Plan?
  • How Does Internet from Space Work?
  • Stein Vetoes NC’s Constitutional Carry Bill
  • Can the Golden Dome Save America from an EMP Attack?
  • Could Blue Blob New York City Get a Lot Worse?
  • Warning! Your Survival Guy’s on a Boil Water Advisory

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

My Key West Garden Office

Your Retirement Life: Traveling the Efficient Frontier

Live a Long Life

Your Survival Guy’s Mt. Rushmore of Investing Legends

“Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”

Copyright © 2025 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives