Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • World Gold Mine Production

Hydrogen, Dependent on a New Economy

April 18, 2023 By Debbie Young

SpaceX Chief Engineer Elon Musk answers a question from the press in front of the Crew Dragon that is being prepared for the Demo-2 mission, at SpaceX Headquarters, Thursday, Oct. 10, 2019 in Hawthorne, CA. Photo credit: (NASA/Aubrey Gemignani)

More Government Central Planning and Handouts

Francis Menton has a great deal of admiration for Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO. “He is a bona fide creative genius,” applauds Mr. Menton.

The Gaming of Government Subsidies

That said, aka The Manhattan Contrarian also advises readers not to lose track of this: Elon Musk’s main pre-Twitter businesses –electric vehicles, batteries, solar panels and space launches – are almost entirely, if not entirely, dependent for their revenue on the gaming of government subsidy and handout programs.

The electric vehicle business, in particular, that underlies the lion’s share of Musk’s net worth, has a valuation that can only be justified by a faith that essentially all vehicles will soon be electrified.

So far, the market share of EVs has been almost entirely dependent on a combination of government subsidies and compulsion (e.g., “fuel economy” standards that exempt EVs). If EVs don’t take over the auto market, then Musk may be no wealthier than you or I come 2030. I suggest keeping that in mind when considering the Tesla “Sustainable Energy” Report.

There is a huge amount of detail in the report, and Mr. Menton narrows it to looking at how the Tesla Report proposes to deal with the energy storage for the U.S.

Recall that Ken Gregory calculated that if the U.S. fully converted to wind and solar generation, it would need to store approximately 250,000 GWh (which would be 250 TWh) to make it through a full annual storage and discharge cycle, given the seasonal pattern of wind and solar generation. Try to provide the 250 TWh of storage with lithium ion batteries at $200/KWh, and that will run you about $50 trillion. That would be slightly unaffordable, given current U.S. annual GDP of under $25 trillion.

At the Manhattan Contrarian, Menton presents a chart on how Tesla plans to deal with the issue of storage for the U.S.

Tesla’s answer is hydrogen.

The total storage proposed, at 120 TWh, is less than half of what Gregory calculated as needed, but not wildly out of range.

In Tesla’s favor, the idea of using hydrogen for the storage is substantially less insane than relying mostly on batteries. But, as discussed in my energy storage Report, hydrogen produced by electrolysis from water using electricity only from renewables is far from cheap. For my Report, I found a figure of $4-6/kg for producing this “green” hydrogen, which translates to a price of $32 – 48/MMBTUs (the units in which natural gas prices are typically quoted).

By contrast, natural gas prices fluctuate, but over the last ten years they have always been under $10/MMBTU, and mostly around $3-5/MMBTU. The current price is more like $2/MMBTU. The Tesla Report cites a price of about $3/kg ($24/MMBTU) just to store the hydrogen on an annual basis.

Hydrogen, explains the Manhattan Contrarian, is more challenging to deal with than natural gas in every respect.

It is less energy dense (meaning, more pipeline capacity needed to transport the same amount of energy), it embrittles steel pipes, it is more explosive and dangerous, it is more prone to leaks, and so forth.

To move to hydrogen as the vehicle of energy storage would mean creating an entire national infrastructure of new facilities. Next to none of that currently exists, nor is it under construction or even in the planning stage. I can’t find any effort in the Tesla Report to estimate a cost for any of this.

Will private investment not build it? Probably not. It’s too expensive. Natural gas is cheaper and better in every respect.

Nobody is going to buy green hydrogen at $40/MMBTU when natural gas can be had for $5, and nobody is going to build the infrastructure to transport and store hydrogen until it is price competitive to do so.

Despite Tesla boasting that their zero-carbon energy system “requires less investment and less material extraction,” the fact is the market is saying otherwise.

The whole “hydrogen economy” thing is completely dependent on a new economy of government central planning and handouts and is sitting around waiting for the next round of hundreds of billions of dollars of government subsidies to get it going.

Energizing the Bureaucrats

Why would Tesla put out such a report? Easy to understand.

Getting the bureaucrats excited about their utopia coming to pass is the route to the mandates and subsidies for EVs and batteries for decades to come, all of which will maintain Musk as the world’s richest man. And if it all doesn’t work in the end? Somebody else’s problem.

… if all this can be done for “less investment” than our current system, there should be real money to be made by building the demonstration project to show us all how it works.

How about taking one of the smaller Hawaiian Islands (Maui?), and installing the wind turbines, solar panels, hydrogen electrolyzers, and storage facilities to go 100% carbon free? The Hawaiians will all save money, and you’ll make additional billions.

Menton Admonishes Musk

Put up, or shut up!

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Unleashing the Energy Economy
  • How’s the Economy?
  • The Trump Economy Going Strong
  • How Obama Shackled a Healthy Economy
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie, editor-in-chief of Richardcyoung.com, has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over five decades. When not in Key West, Debbie spends her free time researching and writing in and about Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving her Porsche Boxter S through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • The Nickel Pickle from EVs - June 5, 2023
  • Rewarding Loyalty with Ridicule - June 2, 2023
  • Auto Profitability Colliding with Low Emissions - June 1, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • To Me There Isn’t a Better Way to Live
  • A Cashless Society Is A Debacle for Americans
  • Paris, The Palace Hotels: Part I
  • If You’re a Highly Effective Person, We Should Talk
  • We’ll Burn the Place Down!
  • Your Life on Main Street will Never be the Same
  • The Problem in America
  • Hey, Where’s Everyone Going? Follow the Money Kid
  • When the Black Swan Swoops In for You
  • The Clock is Ticking: You Must Protect Your Family

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Joe Biden’s Death Warrant for Fossil Fuel Plants
  • Stossel Says DeSantis Is "Smarter and Better than Biden."
  • The Party Is Going Off the Rails
  • Will Anyone from the FBI Be Held Accountable for the Russiagate Hoax?
  • America’s Favorite Wordsmith Needs Tutoring
  • Rewarding Loyalty with Ridicule
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Pushing the Envelope Too Far
  • What Binds the Woke Left Together?
  • June Is Retirement Compounders Month

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Successful Investing Is a Mindset
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • Does the Government Have a Plan to “Sneak Through” CBDCs?
  • OPEC+: Saudi Arabia To Cut 1M Barrels of Oil Production
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • What’s Hiding In the London Metals Exchange Warehouses?
  • Is the World Ready for “Mixed Reality?”
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • June Is Retirement Compounders Month
  • What Is a Fiduciary Duty? Are You Working with a Fiduciary?

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • Your Survival Guy’s Best Insider’s Guide to Rome
  • What Is a Fiduciary Duty? Are You Working with a Fiduciary?
  • Survive and Thrive June 2023: Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Social Security: Declining Italy Needs a Bambino Boom
  • ATTACK ON THE IVAN KHURS: Unmanned Vessels Changing Naval Warfare

Successful Investing Is a Mindset

The Nickel Pickle from EVs

My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy

Why Is the Media So Terrified of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Ideas?

Sen. Rand Paul Says It’s Time to Fight Back Against the Woke Left

Should McCarthy Have Forced the Government’s Hand?

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives