One question any ethical person could ask: who would have voted for Hitler?
Looking into the integrity in America’s 2020 presidential election, Dennis Prager in American Greatness lists some of the 2020 election anomalies. Some states allowed unprecedented changes to election laws (fact checked).
- In 132 years, no president has received more votes in his run for reelection and lost. Yet Donald Trump received 10 million more votes in 2020 than in 2016 — and lost.
- Trump won 18 of the 19 counties both Democrats and Republicans regard as the “bellwether” counties that virtually always go with the outcome of presidential elections. Yet he lost.
- He won four bellwether states—Florida, Ohio, Iowa, and North Carolina. Yet he lost.
- Mostly Democratic states sent out tens of millions of ballots or applications for absentee ballots to people who never requested them.
- Voting began in some states six weeks before Election Day.
- People have submitted sworn affidavits at great personal cost and with possible perjury charges that they witnessed ballot tampering on election night.
“All these things would matter little if Democrats involved in ballot-counting felt morally compelled to count votes honestly,” argues Mr. Prager, before asking two questions:
- Would moral considerations prevent Democrats from cheating to oust Trump?
No, answers Mr. Prager to this question.
“Moral considerations would not prevent decent Democrats from cheating to prevent Trump’s reelection.”
(To put the question in the positive:)
- Would Democrats deem it morally obligatory to cheat on behalf of Joe Biden?
Yes, Prager answers question #2:
“Decent Democrats would deem it morally obligatory to cheat on behalf of Biden.”
For four years, the media and their party, the Democrats, told us every day that Trump is a fascist, a dictator, a racist, and a white supremacist; that he was an agent of the Russian government—a real-life Manchurian candidate. We were also repeatedly told by the lying media (Trump’s accurate description of the mainstream media) that in Charlottesville, Virginia, Trump said there are “very fine” Nazis (see the PragerU video, “The Media’s ‘Very Fine People’ Myth”).
Yes, the media told us with a straight face that a man with a Jewish daughter, Jewish son-in-law, and Jewish grandchildren said there are fine Nazis. Biden said he decided to run for president because of this lie.
So, then, here is the question: Why would anyone who sincerely believed Trump is a white-supremacist fascist dictator not cheat if he or she could prevent such a person from becoming or remaining president of the United States?
To Sharpen the Question:
Isn’t someone who could prevent a fascist, white-supremacist, Nazi-defending dictator morally obligated to cheat if he or she could prevent such a person from becoming president?
Mr. Prager never claimed Biden did not win the election. Even if there had been fraud, he maintains, that doesn’t mean the election result would have been different. But there are consequences to beliefs, he observes.
Unless Democrats knew they were lying for four years when they labeled Trump a fascist, racist, Nazi, dictator, etc., were they not duty-bound to cheat on Biden’s behalf?
So, then, when you have circumstantial evidence (not proof), combined with opportunity, desire, motive and, most important, no moral argument against cheating and a strong moral argument for cheating, it isn’t a “lie,” and it isn’t a crackpot conspiracy theory, to wonder about the integrity of America’s 2020 presidential election.