Should It Be Called Immunity if You Can Still Catch and Spread the Virus?

By Lightspring @ Shutterstock.com

On Mercola.com, Dr. Meryl Nass questions whether or not the “immunity” offered by Pfizer’s vaccine should be called “immunity” if the vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus. She writes (abridged):

• Public health officials have said over and over that they do not know if COVID-19 vaccines prevent spread
• Pfizer did not test human subjects to see if those vaccinated could get and spread the infection, but when they tested primates, vaccinated animals still got COVID-19 despite being vaccinated
• Both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are made from messenger RNA and lipid nanoparticles containing polyethylene glycol (PEG); no vaccines made from messenger RNA nor this type of lipid nanoparticles have ever been used in humans; we have no idea about their long-term side effects
• No one knows how long “immunity” lasts from COVID-19 vaccines, if in fact the vaccines do provide some degree of immunity — should it be called immunity if you can still catch and spread the virus?
• This is a document designed to force EMTs to take the vaccine by using false information and veiled threats; when a product is good for you, there is no need to scare or threaten people into taking it,

Analysis by Dr. Meryl Nass