Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Joe Manchin Is Infuriating Fellow Democrats, AGAIN

February 16, 2022 By The Editors

Senator Joe Manchin at NETL. July 7, 201. Photo Simon Edelman, Energy Department.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) is already reviled by many in his party. Now they’ll have reason to dislike him even more. Manchin has announced that under no circumstances will he allow Joe Biden to have a Supreme Court nominee for any potential additional openings on the court between now and the mid-term election. That’s not to imply that Manchin will impede the confirmation process for Biden’s imminent nominee, but any further nominees will be forced to wait for what could very likely be a GOP-led Senate. Hot Air reports:

Manchin: If there’s another SCOTUS vacancy close to the midterms, I won’t allow it to be filled.

I spent an entertaining 20 minutes on social media this afternoon watching liberals have conniptions in response to this comment.

He infuriated them by tanking Build Back Better. He made mortal enemies of them by refusing to change the filibuster to pass voting-rights legislation.

If he denied them a Supreme Court seat — particularly an opportunity to replace a conservative on the Court — I think they’d sink his house boat.

Manchin tells reporters of a hypothetical SCOTUS vacancy close to an election: “I’m not going to be hypocritical on that. If it would come a week or two weeks before like it did with our last Supreme Court nominee, I think that’s the time it should go to the next election”

— Burgess Everett (@burgessev) February 14, 2022


What does Manchin mean when he says he doesn’t want to be hypocritical? Well, despite his habit of supporting Republican SCOTUS nominees, he voted no on Amy Coney Barrett in 2020. The reason? Timing:

“Today the Senate took unprecedented action never before seen in the 240 year history of our country, but it didn’t have to be this way. Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans chose a dangerous, partisan path to push through the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett eight days before this year’s November 3rd election further politicizing the highest court in the land. The facts are clear—never before has the president nominated and the Senate confirmed a Supreme Court justice between July and Election Day in a presidential election year.

“This degradation of Senate norms and procedures didn’t start with the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and it won’t end here. The U.S. Senate is supposed to be the greatest deliberative body in the world and perhaps we used to be. But each time a Senate majority – regardless of party – changes the rules, we reduce the incentive to work together across party lines. Instead, the partisan governing of the last ten years and the rushed nomination of Judge Barrett only fans the flames of division at a time when Americans are deeply divided. Judge Barrett’s nomination and the confirmation process are far from business as usual. I cannot support the nomination of Judge Barrett to the Supreme Court of the United States on the eve of a Presidential election. It is simple – this nomination should have waited until after the election.”

It may be true that no justices have been confirmed after July in a presidential election year. (I’ll take Manchin’s word for it.) But there have been justices confirmed after July in a midterm election year. Why, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed in October 2018.

And among the senators who voted for Kavanaugh was … Joe Manchin.

I will vote to support Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. pic.twitter.com/1FfuMTOZz8

— Senator Joe Manchin (@Sen_JoeManchin) October 5, 2018


“The Manchin Rule: In the interests of preserving bipartisan norms, only one party is permitted to appoint SCOTUS justices right before elections,” tweeted annoyed Democrat Greg Sargent. Dave Weigel blames Democrats themselves for misplaying the Kavanaugh confirmation, painting themselves into a strategic corner in case a second vacancy does open on the Court later this year:

Manchin *voted for Kavanaugh* but Ds pounded “not so close to an election” and made that the new standard – even though they’ll likely never get to take advantage of it. (Next chance would be 2028, if Rs win presidency in 2024 and Ds win Senate in 2026.)

— David Weigel (@daveweigel) February 14, 2022

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Joe Manchin's Current Power over Democrats: Unrivaled and Extraordinary
  • Sen Joe Manchin Carries Water for President Obama
  • Democrats Don't Want Biden to Run Again
  • Why Democrats Are Terrified
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • Florida Seeks to Expand the Protection of Children - March 23, 2023
  • Bolton Says U.S. Should Have Attacked Iran as well as Iraq - March 23, 2023
  • Carlson: The Media Are Part of the Control Apparatus - March 22, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • The Swiss Way
  • The Clock is Ticking: You Must Protect Your Family
  • DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians
  • What a Way to Make a Living: New Hampshire #1
  • Gold’s 50-Year Price Explosion
  • When Is the Best Time for You to Do This?
  • FARM AMERICA: New York City’s Finest Cheesemongers
  • Democracy & Diversity: Not In the Constitution
  • Who Is Alex Jones?
  • Thanks to America’s Worst President

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Pushing Back at ESG
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Who'd be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?
  • Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver
  • Biden Has Lost Control of the Northern Border Too
  • Get Well Soon Taki
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Border Patrol Chief Admits U.S. Border Is Out of Control
  • SPIES ON CAMPUS: The Chinese Have Invaded the Quad

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • If You’re a Highly Effective Person, We Should Talk
  • Trouble Now Brewing at Deutsche Bank
  • Is Vanguard Voting Against Your Political Beliefs?
  • Are 0DTE Options a Threat to Markets?
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Treasury Studying How to Increase Deposit Insurance
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability?

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • If You’re a Highly Effective Person, We Should Talk
  • What’s Happening to Charles Schwab?
  • Prepare for the Predictable
  • Is Vanguard Voting Against Your Political Beliefs?
  • Call It the Difference between Normal and Crazy
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”
  • DEMOCRATIC SENATOR: Biden’s ESG Veto “Absolutely Infuriating”
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • How Long Is Your Water Supply Chain?
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West

Biden’s Fake Democracy Summit: Hungary and Turkey Snubbed

Freefalling at Stanford

If You’re a Highly Effective Person, We Should Talk

DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians

Do You Know How to Slow Your Brain’s Aging?

We’ll Burn the Place Down!

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives