Richardcyoung.com

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin & Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity & Wellington Since 1971
  • Hillsdale College
  • Babson College
  • Contact Us

Safety vs. Privacy

January 8, 2010 By The Editors

Since the failed terror attack on Christmas day, the debate over full-body scanners has exploded, so to say. Without such scanners, say advocates, Americans will never be safe in the skies. It is tempting for politicians to mandate a full-body scanner in every airport, and surely the manufacturers of such devices are doling out campaign contributions this very moment. However, the effectiveness of such scanners is in doubt. The Independent in London reported that the Christmas bomb “would not have been detected by body-scanners.” Privacy rights groups are also fulminating at the thought of scanners that can peer through passengers’ clothing. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has come out strongly against the mass use of full-body scanners. Michael German of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office said, “We should be focusing on evidence-based, targeted and narrowly tailored investigations based on individualized suspicion, which would be both more consistent with our values and more effective than diverting resources to a system of mass suspicion.”

As a civil libertarian I sympathize with Mr. German, but as a sane person, I understand the need for better security in airports. As a free marketeer I say, “Why not have both?” Why not allow airlines to offer “secure” flights, on which people forgo civil liberties to ensure their own safety? Travelers flying on these flights would go through hellish security measures, but would undoubtedly make it to their destinations. At the same time, allow flights protecting the civil liberties of more bashful travelers with traditional security. “But who will board these risky flights when there is a safer alternative?” you might ask. I’ll tell you who: no one. I doubt anyone out there is so scared of having his physique briefly X-rayed, or getting to second base with a TSA officer, to choose the risky flight over the safer flight. Given a choice, people will choose safety over privacy every time. In economics, we use game theory to determine choices people will make given the values of a set of possible outcomes. Rational travelers will always choose more security, because privacy is worthless when you’re dead.

Related Posts

  • Myth vs Fact in Wisconsin
  • Multiculturalism vs. America
  • Southwest Flight 1380 Safety and Briefings
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
The Editors
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • STARLING: IBM Is Building a ‘Fault Tolerant’ Quantum Computer - June 16, 2025
  • Mossad in Iran - June 16, 2025
  • Are California Politicians Abetting the Violence? - June 11, 2025

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • The Armed American Family: Part I
  • The Masters of the Universe Align Themselves with CHINA Using YOUR Money?
  • Hey, Where’s Everyone Going? Follow the Money Kid
  • Who Owns Your Assets?
  • Vermont Abandoned, Dairy Farm Economy Devastated
  • DEATH SPIRAL: Crime Soars in Democrats’ #DEFUNDTHEPOLICE Cities
  • Boom or Bust: “What Do You Think of Bitcoin?
  • “The Goal”: Strong Families, Resilient Faith, Thriving Middle Class.
  • Set Sail with Stocks
  • Americans Must Demand an End to the Welfare-Warfare State

Our Most Popular Posts

  • The Night of the Living Dead
  • TRUMP: "Everyone Should Immediately Evacuate Tehran!"
  • Are You Familiar with the EF and Arithmetic?
  • A Classic Issue from Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
  • A Nationwide Day of Defiance
  • Political Theater on Display: Padilla's Wild Day
  • Best Bang for Your Buck: Top 5 AR-15s of 2025
  • Epic Man Cave with Car Elevator in Utah
  • Israelis Speculate on American Involvement in War with Iran
  • GBU-57/B: Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report from Feb. 1987
  • America’s Energy Boom: Record Net Exports and Rising Renewables
  • Senate Passes First U.S. Stablecoin Regulation Bill
  • Game-Changing Vision: Meta and Oakley Unveil AI Performance Eyewear
  • A Great Victory for Liberty
  • Letchworth: Are You Living Your Best Retirement Life?
  • Job Openings Rise in Four States, National Rate Steady
  • Ethane Shipments Stall as U.S.-China Trade Tensions Rise
  • Historic Tax Cuts Across All States
  • Are You Familiar with the EF and Arithmetic?

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report from Feb. 1987
  • Private Equity Is the Next Big Thing Coming for YOU
  • The Wildlife in Kansas
  • PRECIOUS: Silver and Gold
  • June Rage Gauge: Best Déjeuners in Paris
  • Letchworth: Are You Living Your Best Retirement Life?
  • Will SALT Kill the “One Big Beautiful Bill?”
  • You’ve Read the Last Issue of Intelligence Report: Back to Investor’s Yield
  • The Sound of Silence?
  • Are You Familiar with the EF and Arithmetic?

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

My Key West Garden Office

Your Retirement Life: Traveling the Efficient Frontier

Live a Long Life

Your Survival Guy’s Mt. Rushmore of Investing Legends

“Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”

Copyright © 2025 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives