Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Freedom Force
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Bank for International Settlements

Can a President Be Found Guilty of “Thought Crimes”?

January 23, 2020 By Richard C. Young

President Donald J. Trump addresses his remarks Saturday, Dec. 21, 2019, at Turning Point USA’s 5th annual Student Action Summit at the Palm Beach County Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Fla. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

At The American Spectator, E. Donald Elliot eviscerates Democrats’ impeachment arguments. Elliot explains that Democrats are targeting the President for supposed “thought crimes.” Elliot argues that the best thing the Senate could do would be to dismiss the charges as invalid. He suggests such a course “would have the added side benefit of being a way out of the current impasse over the Democrats’ demands for additional witnesses in a Senate trial.” He writes (abridged):

Both of the articles of impeachment passed by the Democrats in the House are unprecedented in that they charge “thought crimes” against a president.

They are based on the dubious legal theory that doing something that is legal in and of itself but with a supposedly improper mental attitude turns an otherwise legal act into an impeachable offense.

The second article of impeachment for so-called obstruction of Congress also involves a thought crime, but based on an even more far-fetched theory.

The idea there is that by invoking Executive privilege, the president was somehow “obstructing” a Congressional investigation. This is specious, as Professor Jonathan Turley rightly pointed out in his testimony.

In addition, if the Democrats’ newly minted legal theory that otherwise legal exercises of presidential power become impeachable offenses if they are done for what a majority of the House considers to be an inappropriate motive is accepted, we will fundamentally change the structure of American government; our president, like the British prime minister, would serve at the pleasure of a majority of the lower house.

These are all good reasons why the House should not have done what it did in impeaching President Trump.

By merely acquitting the President, the Senate could be seen by history as implying that the allegations, if proven, would have constituted valid ground for impeachment, which would do irreparable damage to our constitutional system.

Dismissing the charges as invalid would have the added side benefit of being a way out of the current impasse over the Democrats’ demands for additional witnesses in a Senate trial.

If a majority of the Senate rules that the factual allegations, even if they could be proved, would not add up to a valid basis for impeaching the President, there is nothing left to try.

Read more here.

Related Posts

  • President Trump Does the Impossible
  • Tucker Interviews President Trump
  • President Donald Trump Cannot be Indicted
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • Neither Cancel Culture nor COVID Can Shut Down CPAC - February 26, 2021
  • Has Bill Gates Been Injected Yet? - February 26, 2021
  • Fauci Doesn’t Own Your Face - February 25, 2021

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Government Should Be Small, Laws Unobtrusive, and Men Left Alone
  • The Butterfly Effect and Chaotic Markets
  • The Three Best Retirement Decisions I Ever Made
  • What Do You Know About Rho-Kinase?
  • To Me There Isn’t a Better Way to Live
  • My Battle-Hardened Stock Market Strategy for the Worst of Times
  • Being Fully American Means Americans First
  • Why Some Kids Won’t Go Back to School, Ever
  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be
  • Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Charles Koch Team Up

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Has the Time Come to Abolish the American Government?
  • Enjoy the Boom While You Can
  • Marry Compound Interest, Divorce Market Timing
  • Texas – More Subsidies for Wind, More Regulations for Oil
  • Richard Young Reports: 50+ Years with Fidelity and Wellington
  • UPDATE: Your Gun Rights and Freedom Are Under Assault
  • Please Don’t Call It COVID Relief
  • Permitless Carry Corridor Expands: Red States Trouncing Blue States on Freedom
  • Biden Tells Audience that Blacks and Hispanics Don't Know How to Use the Internet
  • Long Live Rush Limbaugh: Our Walk in the Woods

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Welcome to the Interest Rate Prediction Business, JACK!
  • Democrats Have a Plan: Don’t Get Too Attached to Your Capital Gains
  • Petrified Snow/Ice Fishing? How about a Boat? and More
  • Bubble in Tech Stocks Will Cause “Clean Out” in Markets
  • COVID Chaos: New York and California vs. Florida and South Dakota
  • Time for the Fed To Stop Babying the Bond Market
  • Richard Young Reports: 50+ Years with Fidelity and Wellington
  • Deep Survival, Who Lives, Who Dies, and Why
  • Herd Immunity by April?
  • Corporate Bond Yields: What You Can Earn Today

Neither Cancel Culture nor COVID Can Shut Down CPAC

The Political Downside of Stoking Fear

Welcome to the Interest Rate Prediction Business, JACK!

Has Bill Gates Been Injected Yet?

Fauci Doesn’t Own Your Face

Gov. Newsom Discovering the Power of the Pen

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives