You may have read in the WSJ yesterday: “States Revenue Shortfalls Exacerbate Budget Crunch.” My friend Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies at Cato, had to laugh at the “states as victims” part. You’ve probably guessed why:
“States as victims” is a common storyline in the mainstream media anytime that state budgets are not growing gangbusters. States need to balance their general fund budgets each year, and so it is true that state policymakers must be more responsible than the spend-and-borrow politicians in Washington. But news stories on the states rarely provide the important context of how much budgets have grown over time.
The chart below—based on NASBO data—shows general fund revenues since fiscal 2010, with projected revenues for fiscal 2017. To achieve annual balance, the “tough” task of state policymakers is simply to keep spending rising no faster than these revenues.
Does the chart look like a “crunch” to you with “weak” revenue? And if 33 percent revenue growth over seven years and 3.6 percent projected growth in 2017 creates a “shortfall,” what do you think the problem is?
Read more here.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy (see all)
- Are Californians Prepared to Suffer Through 10 Years of Power Outages? - October 23, 2019
- In Mexico, Gun Control Kills - October 22, 2019
- Here’s Why Warren’s Wealth Tax Won’t Work - October 21, 2019