Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve

Was the Soleimani Killing Legal? Yes

January 6, 2020 By The Editors

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper addresses reporters Sunday, Dec. 29, 2019, at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., on the U.S. military defensive strikes against Iranian supported militias in Iraq and Syria. (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

Whether you agree with the decision to kill Qassem Soleimani or not, says Alan Dershowitz, it’s legality is not in question. He writes:

The targeting of Soleimani was more justified, as a matter of law, than the targeting of Osama bin Laden in 2011. The killing of Soleimani was in large part an act of prevention, whereas the killing of bin Laden was primarily an act of retaliation. Would anyone doubt that if Mr. Clinton had succeeded in killing bin Laden before 9/11, as he tried to do, such an action would have been legal under American law? So, too, was it legal for Mr. Trump to order the targeted killing of Soleimani, who was planning to continue his killing spree against Americans.

The killing of Soleimani was also entirely legal under international law. The Quds Force commander was a combatant in uniform who was actively engaged in continuing military and terrorist activities against Americans. The rocket that killed him and a handful of others was carefully calibrated to minimize collateral damage, and the resulting death toll was proportionate to the deaths it may have prevented.

The killing took place in a foreign country, but so did the killing of bin Laden and others who have been targeted. U.S. military and civilian personnel are in Iraq with Baghdad’s approval and have the legal authority to protect Iraqi and American citizens and to neutralize threats to their lives. All the relevant criteria for legality under international law—using authorized and proportionate force to kill a combatant who is engaged in continuing violence—have all been met in this case.

Why then are so many accusing Mr. Trump of acting unlawfully under both domestic and international law? Would the same legal criticism be leveled at Mr. Clinton or Mr. Obama if he had successfully targeted Soleimani? Are the legitimate concerns about the wisdom of the action motivating the baseless criticism of its legality?

Whatever the motivations for trying to find or invent legal objections to the killing of Soleimani, such efforts are dangerous because they could constrain future presidents from taking military actions that are necessary and proper to protect Americans. Let’s continue to debate the wisdom and long-term implications of Mr. Trump’s decision, but let’s not conflate wisdom and policy with legality.

Read more here.

Related Posts

  • Obama’s Nuclear Deal Empowered Soleimani
  • Stop Immigration, Legal and Illegal
  • Those in America Who Benefit Most from a Conflict with Iran
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • CARLSON: “This Is Not the Way Civilized Countries Operate” - August 16, 2022
  • Breaking News: Ukrainian HIMARS Level Wagner Group Base - August 16, 2022
  • WAGNER GROUP: Criminals and Undesirables Bolstering Russia’s Forces in Ukraine? - August 16, 2022

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Can Curcumin Help in Fighting Cancer?
  • My Smith & Wesson Revolvers Home Defense Team
  • ENERGY FREEDOM ACT: Ted Cruz Introduces Bill for Energy Independence
  • Is It All Coming Apart in the Government’s Face?
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France
  • “I’ve Got Guys Buying Guns/Ammo for Me All Through the Night.”
  • Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Charles Koch Team Up
  • The Worst President in American History, Part I
  • Globalism Has Made America Dependent on Foreign Countries
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes, America’s Food Kings

Our Most Popular Posts

  • CDC Admits It Was All A Lie
  • BECK: The Democrats' Dangerous FBI Raid Endgame
  • If It Smells Fishy … ?
  • DEMOCRATS PLAY DIRTY: Megynn Kelly Calls Bulls#$t on "Classified Documents" Story
  • The Great Jon Rappoport on Kari Lake
  • Who Benefits from and Orchestrated the Trump Raid?
  • Thanks to America's Worst President
  • Our Commander-in-Chief Fumbles On
  • WATCH: Doocy Breaks Jean-Pierre with Trump Raid Questions "No Comment"
  • DOJ Career Officers Disgusted by Garland's Political Raid on Trump

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • DEVASTATION: Tsunami Simulation Study Frightens Coastal Dwellers
  • Where’s All the Natural Gas Going to Come From?
  • Fear is a Terrible Emotion: How You Deal with It MATTERS
  • The Victims of a Decade of Easy Money
  • What Happens if the Chinese Blockade Taiwan?
  • Buying A Boat: Who’s Looking Out for You?
  • Is It Time to Talk About the Defects of Index Funds Now?
  • Your Survival Guy’s Favorite Number is 72: Here’s Why
  • Disney Catches Netflix in Streaming Wars
  • PRIMARY RESULTS: Pro-Trump Candidates Clean Up

The Claremont Institute: Protecting the American Way of Life

Thanks to America’s Worst President

The IRS’s Hassle Tax: Spend More on Compliance

DEVASTATION: Tsunami Simulation Study Frightens Coastal Dwellers

ROBERTS: “Today Education Is a Form of Brainwashing”

CARLSON: “This Is Not the Way Civilized Countries Operate”

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives