Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

AUKUS: A New Anglo Firewall Against Chinese Aggression?

September 21, 2021 By The Editors

PACIFIC OCEAN (Aug. 5, 2021) The Royal Australian Navy Canberra-class landing helicopter dock HMAS Canberra (L 02) and the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) conduct maritime maneuvers during the U.S. led Large Scale Global Exercise 21 in the western Pacific. (U.S. Navy courtesy photo) License. This photo has not been altered from its original form.

The United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia have come together to sign an agreement called AUKUS, which subtly builds a firewall against Chinese aggression by arming Australia with nuclear-powered submarines. In Foreign Policy, Stephen M. Walt discusses the pact, writing:

On Sept. 15, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia unveiled a new security partnership, with the less-than-euphonious acronym AUKUS. The three states are close allies of long standing, but the headline item in the new arrangement is a joint effort to equip Australia with a fleet of advanced nuclear-powered submarines. U.S. President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson also announced plans for more extensive cooperation on cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing.

Those basic facts about AUKUS are pretty straightforward. But why it came together—and what it means—is more complicated and far more revealing about where the world is heading.

First and most obviously, this move is a classic illustration of balance-of-power/balance-of-threat politics at work. Although China was not mentioned anywhere in the announcement, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out this initiative was taken in response to growing perceptions of a rising Chinese threat. These perceptions are partly based on China’s increased capabilities—including its capacity to project naval power in the Asia-Pacific—but also on its openly revisionist aims in certain areas. Equipping Australia with long-range, extremely quiet nuclear-powered submarines will enable Canberra to play a more active role in the region, along with the other members of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (the United States, India, and Japan).

Second, although what’s going on here is to some degree purely structural (that is, reflecting shifts in the balance of overall capabilities), in other respects, Beijing has no one to blame but itself. Until recently, Australian opinion was ambivalent about the implications of China’s rise: Business leaders hoped to preserve lucrative commercial ties, and prominent strategists warned that opposing the growth of Chinese power was not in Australia’s interest. But China’s increasingly belligerent conduct—especially its unwarranted decision to impose a punishing trade embargo in response to an Australian proposal for an independent international inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus—has triggered a steady hardening of Australian attitudes. China’s counterproductive response is a reassuring reminder that the United States is not the only great power capable of diplomatic malpractice.

Third, the announcement is a carefully measured step that will take some years to come to fruition. The new arrangement doesn’t threaten Chinese Communist Party rule within China or aim to crater the Chinese economy, which would be self-defeating. But the actions announced on Sept. 15 will complicate Chinese efforts to project power at sea and control critical lines of communication. As such, they will impede future Chinese efforts to overawe nearby countries and gradually persuade them to adopt more compliant postures. In short, it is a move designed to discourage or thwart any future Chinese bid for regional hegemony.

As such, this move also suggests that one of my previous concerns about the prospects for an effective balancing coalition in Asia may not have been as serious as I thought. I had previously noted the collective action problems that afflict most alliances could be especially severe in Asia, in part because of the vast distances involved, which might tempt some countries to sit out disputes occurring far from their shores. In this case, however, we have three countries—only one of them located in the Asia-Pacific—taking steps that will facilitate action in key regional locations. Collective action dilemmas will no doubt still rise, but the broad outlines of an effective balancing coalition are increasingly evident.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Against Whom Is Iran Committing Aggression?
  • War Dogs against Trump
  • The Case Against Education
  • Sunnis Against ISIS
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • Making America Great Again Is What America Wants - March 20, 2023
  • Is Plant-Based Meat Unhealthy and Harmful to the Environment? - March 17, 2023
  • SPIES ON CAMPUS: The Chinese Have Invaded the Quad - March 16, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Tom Brady Is Proof You Shouldn’t Retire if You Still Love Your Work
  • The Worst President in American History
  • Ron Paul: “Freedom and Central Banking Are Not Compatible”
  • Democracy: The Most Dangerous and Insidious Effect of Majority Rule.
  • A Look at the Future of Main Street America
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • YOU DESERVE FREEDOM: Your Hard Work Will Make It Happen
  • DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians
  • The Simple, Elegant Power of the Retirement Compounders
  • Your Odds with Statins: 500 to 1?

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Pushing Back at ESG
  • Washington Is the Systemic Risk
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Biden Has Lost Control of the Northern Border Too
  • Who'd be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?
  • Matt Taibbi Exposes the "Censorship-Industrial Complex"
  • Get Well Soon Taki
  • “Will We Have Enough to Live On Forever?”

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Treasury Studying How to Increase Deposit Insurance
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability?
  • Mortgage Market Not Expected to Settle Down Soon
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • Were Silicon Valley Bank’s Motivations for Taking Losses Pure?
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Major Rail Merger Gets Approval

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • How Long Is Your Water Supply Chain?
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Be Wary of Those Who Wrap Themselves in Capes
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • ESG: Are Markets Ready for “A Needed Dose of Reality?”
  • Was Silicon Valley Bank a Victim of ESG?
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • March RAGE Gauge: Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Gretchen Whitmer Reviving Forced Unionization in Michigan

Who’d be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?

Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening

Get Well Soon Taki

A Cashless Society Is A Debacle for Americans

How about Hiring Erik Prince to Crush the Drug Cartels?

Key West’s Best Burger

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives