Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

S.2277 the Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014

July 29, 2014 By Richard C. Young

Sen. Bob Corker

This act, introduced in the Senate by Bob Corker and the Republicans, potentially is going to bring the GOP, if not the country, to a watershed moment in American history.

I am opposed to S.2277 and urge all members of the Senate and House to reject this overt act of interventionist aggression.

As Pat Buchanan writes:

S.2277 would declare Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine ‘major non-NATO allies’ of the United States, move NATO forces into Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, accelerate the building of an ABM system in Eastern Europe, and authorize U.S. intelligence and military aid for Ukraine’s army in the Donbass war with Russian backed separatists.”

Pat continues” S.2277 would direct the secretary of sate to identify efforts to strengthen democratic institutions inside the Russian Federation, e.g. subvert Vladimir Putin’s government, looking toward regime change.

If Putin has not vacated Crimea and terminated support for Ukraine’s separatist rebels within seven days of passage of the Corker Ultimatum, sweeping sanctions would be imposed on Russian officials, banks and energy companies, including Gazprom. Economic relations between us would be virtually severed.


Where to even start responding to what can only be looked at as an ill-advised reactionary tantrum? A measured, thoughtful approach to forming a position to take on S.2277 starts with careful consideration of the original Weinberger/Powell Doctrine and its five essential elements.

Is support for S.2277 justified by each of the five essential elements of W/P? I rate the scorecard from W/P as zero for five. And I would be interested in hearing Senator Corker’s detailed response as to why he might draw exactly the opposing view.

At such a watershed moment in U.S. history, a reading of the Cato Institute’s Chris Preble’s The Power Problem is an eye opener for all Americans who believe they are being sold a bill of goods by the neocon/interventionists, but are not exactly sure how to respond and fight back.

If Republicans are looking for a solid way to kill their chances to take back the Senate this fall, then support for S.2277 is just the ticket.

Read Part II here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • S.2277 The Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014 Part II
  • Misguided Putin Aggression Sends Russian Stocks Down 16% YTD
  • Hit the Russian Oligarchs with the Magnitsky Act
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • Are You Prepared to Run Out of Water? - March 17, 2023
  • Biden Has Lost Control of the Northern Border Too - March 17, 2023
  • Border Patrol Chief Admits U.S. Border Is Out of Control - March 16, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Yes! Money Can Bring You Happiness
  • TROJAN HORSE: “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” is Critical Race Theory in Disguise
  • California’s Progressive Liberals Have Created a Monster
  • To Me There Isn’t a Better Way to Live
  • The Four Most Important Words in Investing
  • Meet Me at Freddy’s June 2022
  • Remembering Brent Scowcroft
  • Your Odds with Statins: 500 to 1?
  • Conflict Between Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Progressivism (Globalism)
  • Progressive Liberalism Has Dragged America near Ruination

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability?
  • Mortgage Market Not Expected to Settle Down Soon
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • Were Silicon Valley Bank’s Motivations for Taking Losses Pure?
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Major Rail Merger Gets Approval
  • The Education of Barney Frank
  • Credit Suisse Announced “Material Weaknesses” In Its Internal Controls
  • Is Deposit Insurance a Solution or a Problem?

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • ESG: Are Markets Ready for “A Needed Dose of Reality?”
  • Was Silicon Valley Bank a Victim of ESG?
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • March RAGE Gauge: Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Gretchen Whitmer Reviving Forced Unionization in Michigan
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • How the Rich Get Richer: You Invest, They Win
  • Why Investors Should Forget Prices and Focus on Income
  • The Education of Barney Frank

Pushing Back at ESG

Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West

Greetings from Key West

Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver

For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?

Are You Prepared to Run Out of Water?

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives