Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • World Gold Mine Production

Poor Are Poor because Rich Are Rich?

October 1, 2014 By Debbie Young

In NRO Kevin D. Williamson quotes a “superior economist” who once advised that the our national problem is the “stagnation of real wages and the disappearance of jobs offering middle-class incomes, as well as the constant insecurity that comes with not having reliable jobs or assets.”

That economist is none other than Paul Krugman, whose favorite pastime today seems to be chiding the rich for their conspicuous consumption. But as Mr. Williamson asks, how in the world would making Donald Trump, for example, less rich make anyone else less poor? The very poor are generally poor because they do not have jobs. Yet today, not only is the number of employed in America lower than it was when Barack Obama took office, but household income is also down. “Grover Cleveland is looking like a genius in comparison,” writes Kevin. Read more here:

The inequality police are worried that we are living in a new Gilded Age. We should be so lucky: Between 1880 and 1890, the number of employed Americans increased by more than 13 percent, and wages increased by almost 50 percent. I am going to go out on a limb and predict that the Barack Obama years will not match that record; the number of employed Americans is lower today than it was when he took office, and household income is down. Grover Cleveland is looking like a genius in comparison.

The inequality-based critique of the American economy is a fundamentally dishonest one, for a half a dozen or so reasons at least. Claims that the (wicked, wicked) “1 percent” saw their incomes go up by such and such an amount over the past decade or two ignore the fact that different people compose the 1 percent every year, and that 75 percent of the super-rich households in 1995 were in a lower income group by 2005. “The 3 million highest-paying jobs in America paid a lot more in 2005 than did the 3 million highest-paying jobs in 1995” is a very different and considerably less dramatic claim than “The top 1 percent of earners in 1995 saw their household incomes go up radically by 2005.” But the former claim is true and the latter is not.

Paul Krugman, who persists in Dickensian poverty, barely making ends meet between six-figure sinecures, is a particularly energetic scourge of the rich, and he is worried about conspicuous consumption: “For many of the rich, flaunting is what it’s all about. Living in a 30,000 square foot house isn’t much nicer than living in a 5,000 square foot house; there are, I believe, people who can really appreciate a $350 bottle of wine, but most of the people buying such things wouldn’t notice if you substituted a $20 bottle, or maybe even a Trader Joe’s special.” In an earlier piece on the same theme, he urged higher taxes as a way to help the rich toward virtue: “While chiding the rich for their vulgarity may not be as offensive as lecturing the poor on their moral failings, it’s just as futile. Human nature being what it is, it’s silly to expect humility from a highly privileged elite. So if you think our society needs more humility, you should support policies that would reduce the elite’s privileges.” That is, seize their money before they order the 1982 Margaux.

I live in the same city as Donald Trump, so the existence of rich people with toxic taste is not exactly a Muppet News Flash for me. But poor people are not poor because rich people are rich, nor vice versa. Very poor people are generally poor because they do not have jobs, and taking away Thurston Howell III’s second yacht is not going to secure work for them.  Nobody has ever been able to satisfactorily answer the question for me: How would making Donald Trump less rich make anybody else better off?

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • America: The Poor Want In, but The Rich Want Out
  • Targeting the Rich with Taxes Tends to Hurt the Poor
  • Rich States, Poor States and Class Warfare
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie, editor-in-chief of Richardcyoung.com, has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over five decades. When not in Key West, Debbie spends her free time researching and writing in and about Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving her Porsche Boxter S through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • Is This the Summer of the Tick Fest - June 6, 2023
  • The Nickel Pickle from EVs - June 5, 2023
  • Rewarding Loyalty with Ridicule - June 2, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be
  • The Breakfast of Champions
  • We’ll Burn the Place Down!
  • Being Fully American Means Americans First
  • “I’ve Got Guys Buying Guns/Ammo for Me All Through the Night.”
  • TROJAN HORSE: “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” is Critical Race Theory in Disguise
  • Key West’s Best Burger
  • Why Some Kids Won’t Go Back to School, Ever
  • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Thanks to America’s Worst President

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI
  • CBDCs Not “Just Another Form of Money”
  • The Push to Diversify Away from China
  • ALLIGATOR MARKET: Calm Surface Hides Danger Below
  • Will OPEC+ Cuts and New Technology Revive U.S. Shale?
  • Successful Investing Is a Mindset
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • Does the Government Have a Plan to “Sneak Through” CBDCs?
  • OPEC+: Saudi Arabia To Cut 1M Barrels of Oil Production
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI
  • ALLIGATOR MARKET: Calm Surface Hides Danger Below
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • Your Survival Guy’s Best Insider’s Guide to Rome
  • What Is a Fiduciary Duty? Are You Working with a Fiduciary?
  • Survive and Thrive June 2023: Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome

Is This the Summer of the Tick Fest

Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI

CBDCs Not “Just Another Form of Money”

Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding

ALLIGATOR MARKET: Calm Surface Hides Danger Below

The Sham Claims of Lab-Grown “Meat”

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives