Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • My Rifles
  • How We Are Different
  • Foundation Principles
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • About Us
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Survival Guy
  • Your Health
  • Old Confederacy
  • The American Conservative
  • The Trump Economy

Lipitor—Junk Science Math

March 9, 2018 By Richard C. Young

By roger ashford @ Shutterstock.com

Originally posted July 7, 2015.

Shane Ellison, M.Sc., “The Peoples Chemist,” explains in an email (copied below) the difference between relative and absolute risk. As Shane writes, “Statistical contortionism is the art of converting healthy people into patients by using numbers to exaggerate drug benefits. Lipitor is a prime example.”

The message is simple. Never pay any attention to relative risk. You know, the sort of wording that tells you to lower your risk of heart attack by X percent. Instead you want to know the absolute number. You want to know from a specific study the number of patients that benefited as a percent of the total number in any test.

In Shane’s example the worthless and promoted relative number is 36%, while the vital absolute number is a tiny 1%.

When you are considering the value of any specific drug and drug study, ask your doctor to provide you with the number needed to treat (NNT). This will allow you to find out exactly how many patients must be given a specific drug to prevent a specific negative event (heart attack, etc.). By example, the NNT involved in prescribing aspirin to get rid of a headache is 1, meaning that every person given an aspirin to moderate a headache can expect to benefit. I see statin drug studies where the NNT is 100 or even 200 and higher. Here is a post I put up previously on the arithmetic of statin drugs. My original reference source was Business Week.

Shane writes:

Statistical contortionism is the art of converting healthy people into patients by using numbers to exaggerate drug benefits.  Lipitor is a prime example.  Drug companies and physicians use “relative risk reduction” while ignoring the “absolute risk reduction” in order to promote Lipitor use to a wider audience. This practice of statistical contortionism is akin to hiding evidence because it exaggerates benefits.  See for yourself.

Lipitor promoters insist that those with so-called high cholesterol can achieve a 36% “relative risk reduction” in heart attack by using the cholesterol-lowering drug.  The contortionists ignore that the same raw data can yield a more revealing “absolute risk reduction” of a paltry 1%.  Using absolute risk reduction is more accurate because it compares the actual difference between the treated and untreated groups.  Unfortunately, it is not good for increasing sales.

That Lipitor does not prevent heart attack is a death-blow to promoters.  It goes virtually unnoticed because they push the absolute risk reduction under the drug-rug while magnifying relative risk reduction.  This type of advertising disguised as science is the most dangerous trend in journalism today.  It promotes drug use among healthy populations who are needlessly putting themselves at risk for adverse effects of Lipitor like cancer and heart failure.

 

 

The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts

Richard C. Young

Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.

Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)

  • Afghanistan: Top Military Leaders Have Consistently Misled Public - December 10, 2019
  • DHS: Trump Border Strategy Has Worked in 2019 - December 10, 2019
  • Thanks President Trump: Unemployment Rate Lowest in Half-Century - December 9, 2019

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related Posts

 

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • The Worst President in American History, Part I
  • The Armed American Family: Part I
  • Rich Grandchild, Poor Grandchild
  • Progressive Liberalism Has Dragged America near Ruination
  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be
  • Government Should Be Small, Laws Unobtrusive, and Men Left Alone
  • Tucker Explains: Put America First, Put its Families First
  • The Common Ground of Democracy is Sinking Beneath Americans’ Feet
  • Paris, The Palace Hotels: Part I
  • Protection While Traveling in France

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Rich State, Poor State Rankings: This One Tops New England
  • RAGE Gauge: Trump Powers Positivity
  • Your Retirement Life: This State is Dominant Once Again
  • The First Question You Should Ask Before Investing
  • RIP Paul Volcker
  • A Tax-Free Savings Plan for Your Grandchild
  • Your Retirement Life: “My life Has Always Been One of Very Good Fortune”
  • Preferred Stock vs. Common Stock: What You Need to Know
  • Vanguard GNMA Outlook 2020
  • Banks Are Selling Your Private Info to Strangers

Rich State, Poor State Rankings: This One Tops New England

Afghanistan: Top Military Leaders Have Consistently Misled Public

Biden Can’t Handle the Truth on Burisma

Fidelity Investments: Why it’s #1

DHS: Trump Border Strategy Has Worked in 2019

Thanks President Trump: Unemployment Rate Lowest in Half-Century

Copyright © 2019 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives