Richardcyoung.com

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin & Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity & Wellington Since 1971
  • Hillsdale College
  • Babson College
  • Artificial Intelligence Opposed
  • Contact Us

Breaking News: Welcome Back Justin Logan!

December 21, 2017 By E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy

We are pleased to welcome back Justin Logan to www.richardcyoung.com. You can search the website for his sharp-witted and timeless takes on politics and American foreign policy. Read Justin’s latest piece here with much more to come in 2018!

Formerly the Cato Institute’s director of foreign policy studies, Logan writes primarily about politics and American foreign policy. He holds a master’s degree in international relations from the University of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in international relations from American University. He is an expert on U.S. grand strategy, international relations theory, and American foreign policy. He has lectured on American strategy across the country and across the world, and his articles have appeared in International Security, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Foreign Policy, the National Interest, the Harvard International Review, Orbis, National Review, the American Conservative, Reason, Politico, and the American Prospect, among others. A native Missourian, Logan currently lives in Washington, DC with his wife and two sons, where they own a Latin American wine and spirits bar, Ruta del Vino.

North Korea: Maybe We’re Just Stuck

By Justin Logan | December, 21 2017

Jeffrey Lewis is the rare scholar who combines the ability to write engagingly with knowledge of national security. His piece in a recent Washington Post Outlook section explaining “how nuclear war with North Korea would unfold” was an eye-opener. Combining too-plausible accounts of the mercurial leadership in Pyongyang and Washington, the paranoia of mid-level military officers, and the clumsy use of military exercises and bluster for the purpose of signaling, Lewis sketched a hypothetical scenario in 2019 in which a:

direct hit on Manhattan killed more than 1 million people. An additional 300,000 perished near Washington. The strikes on Jupiter (Florida) and Pearl Harbor each killed 20,000 to 30,000. These were just estimates; the scale of the destruction defied authorities’ ability to account for the dead. Hundreds of thousands perished in South Korea and Japan from the combination of the blasts and fires.

[I]n the end, officials concluded, nearly 2 million Americans, South Koreans and Japanese had died in the completely avoidable nuclear war of 2019.

How in the world do we find ourselves in a situation where the above is possible, and why can’t we find a way out?

Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama, and now Trump have had little answer to the problem, and each of them has watched it get worse. Even Trump’s National Security Strategy congratulates the administration in uncharacteristically meek fashion for “rallying the world against the rogue regime in North Korea.”

The debate in Washington over What to Do About North Korea has two sides: those who think bluster and the threat of war will either cause Kim Jong-un to slouch and accept an unfavorable diplomatic outcome (or possibly produce a war that will eliminate the regime), and those who favor backing away from the war option and trying a new diplomatic course.

Lewis’ article (and Barry Posen’s piece in the New York Times two days before) should dispel any notion that war would be something worth pursuing. Posen’s piece makes clear that in any scenario other than a U.S. nuclear first strike against Pyongyang–and possibly even then–the North Koreans could likely see us coming, as a consequence of the complexity and scale of a preventive war. If they saw us coming, they have an array of options at their disposal, including the possibility of a nuclear strike on the United States. As tiresome as it sounds, there is no military option that looks sane.

Others favor redoubling diplomatic efforts. To this approach’s credit, hundreds of thousands of people would not die in the first few days of a diplomatic effort. To its demerit, it is tough to see how there is any diplomatic breakthrough to be had.

The first and most obvious obstacle is President Trump’s Twitter account. Milder diplomatic objectives with easier customers than the North Koreans have proved terribly difficult to achieve, and required painstaking, delicate diplomacy over a course of months. It is difficult to imagine someone with Trump’s temperament and love for Twitter shepherding such a process forward.

But even if he became a Buddhist luddite, Trump would have difficulty fixing the problem diplomatically. Pain me though it does to admit, the Beltway consensus here is correct: China is the key to denuclearizing the peninsula. It’s impossible to imagine a scenario in which Beijing  doesn’t play the decisive role.

This has led a number of observers, including my old colleague Doug Bandow, to suggest sweetening the deal for the Chinese: help us verifiably denuclearize North Korea, and we’ll remove our troops from South Korea. This is a much better deal than what Washington usually offers China–help us verifiably denuclearize North Korea, and we’ll be really thankful–but I suspect even this isn’t good enough.

First, there is the Chinese concern about a North Korean collapse. If the Chinese began squeezing Pyongyang progressively harder, it is possible that at some point that pressure would cause the regime to implode. North Korean refugees would flood over the border into China, by the tens if not hundreds of thousands, in short order. This would impose economic, social, and security costs for Beijing. And unless the Americans unilaterally removed all of their troops first, China could face a scenario where refugees are flowing over its border, North Korea is in chaos, and across the next border is American-allied South Korea with 30,000 U.S. troops on its territory. That’s not a nuclear war, but U.S. troops on the Korean peninsula absent the North Korean buffer state is pretty close to worst-case for Beijing.

And even if the Chinese could delicately apply pressure just steadily enough to produce a change of heart in Pyongyang, the question of sequencing is likely to be intractable. How would the Americans leave? Who would be in charge of verifying the North’s denuclearization, and to what standard? When American hawks inevitably begin complaining about the pace and scale of North Korean compliance, what then? Why should the Chinese trust a Trump administration that listened to John Bolton on Iran?

My own preferred course, trying a variation of the Bandow moonshot while preparing to unilaterally tell the South Koreans that the time has come for them to decide how they’d like to deal with their neighbor to the North on their own, carries its own downsides. Namely: political infeasibility, and the prospect that as the risk of a war on the peninsula involving the United States went down, the prospect of a war on the peninsula absent the United States could go up.

“We’re probably just doomed on this one” isn’t a great title for a think tank paper or op-ed. It doesn’t rally the troops, or wind up the donors, or offer an easy political win for those in power. But clarity and candor carry their own virtues. Instead of insisting that more diplomacy or military coercion hold much promise, Washington would do well to spend more time considering how we wound up in this mess to begin with–and how to avoid it the next time.

Related Posts

  • Welcome to Dearbornistan
  • Welcome Justin Logan
  • Breaking Bad, Breaking Good
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy
E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy
E.J. Smith is Founder of YourSurvivalGuy.com, Managing Director at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd., a Managing Editor of Richardcyoung.com, and Editor-in-Chief of Youngresearch.com. His focus at all times is on preparing clients and readers for “Times Like These.” E.J. graduated from Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, with a B.S. in finance and investments. In 1995, E.J. began his investment career at Fidelity Investments in Boston before joining Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. in 1998.

E.J. has trained at Sig Sauer Academy in Epping, NH, NH, where he completed course-work in Practical and Defensive Handgun, Conceal Carry Pistol, Shotguns, Precision Scope Rifle and Kidnapping Prevention.

E.J. plays a Yamaha Recording Custom drum set with Zilldjian cymbals. His first drum set was a 5-piece Slingerland with Zildjians. He grew-up worshiping Neil Peart (RIP) of the band Rush, and loves the song Tom Sawyer—the name of his family’s boat, a Grady-White Canyon 306. He grew up in Mattapoisett, MA, an idyllic small town on the water near Cape Cod. He spends time in Newport, RI and Bartlett, NH—both as far away from Wall Street as one could mentally get. The Newport office is on a quiet, tree lined street not far from the harbor and the log cabin in Bartlett, NH, the “Live Free or Die” state, sits on the edge of the White Mountain National Forest. He enjoys spending time in Key West (RIP JB) and Paris.

Please get in touch with E.J. at ejsmith@yoursurvivalguy.com

Click here to sign up for my free monthly Survive & Thrive letter.
E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy
Latest posts by E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy (see all)
  • Congratulations, You’re Retired #3: “When You Were Young” - May 16, 2025
  • Congratulations on Graduation Day from Work to Retirement “2.0 and Go” - May 15, 2025
  • No SALT Please: Part II - May 15, 2025

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Does Big Government Create Poverty?
  • Escape From the City: You’re Going to Like What You See
  • Gold/Silver Coins No Longer Allowed in Safe Deposit Boxes
  • California’s Progressive Liberals Have Created a Monster
  • We’ll Burn the Place Down!
  • Meet Me at Freddy’s June 2022
  • You’re Ready to “Make It a Good Month”
  • I Meant to Tell You My Recent “Survival Guy” Story
  • What Do You Know About Rho-Kinase?
  • How Will YOU Feel in Retirement? Let Me Explain

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Congratulations, You’re Retired #3: “When You Were Young”
  • Magnets Run the World — And China Runs the Magnets
  • USGS Launches Major New England Critical Minerals Survey
  • U.S. Import and Export Prices Edge Up in April Amid Fuel Declines
  • Denmark Considers Ending 40-Year Nuclear Ban
  • Apple’s Next-Gen CarPlay Rolls Out in U.S. and Canada
  • Congratulations on Graduation Day from Work to Retirement “2.0 and Go”
  • Could an Economic Slowdown Curb Global Oil Consumption Growth?
  • No SALT Please: Part II
  • Vertical Aerospace Advances Toward VX4 Certification

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Congratulations, You’re Retired #3: “When You Were Young”
  • Are You Giving a Tax Free Gift in 2025?
  • Does Your Lazy Cash Need a Home?
  • Congratulations on Graduation Day from Work to Retirement “2.0 and Go”
  • $3 Million Makeover of the International Tennis Hall of Fame
  • No SALT Please: Part II
  • Graduating from Work to Retirement: Now What? Part 1
  • You’re Not Dreaming, Food Prices Are Falling
  • Can America Generate Enough Power for New Data Centers?
  • TRUMP: More SALT Please

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

My Key West Garden Office

Your Retirement Life: Traveling the Efficient Frontier

Live a Long Life

Your Survival Guy’s Mt. Rushmore of Investing Legends

“Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”

Copyright © 2025 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives