Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • Critical Race Theory
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money

Without Comey, No Mueller Investigation

May 30, 2019 By Debbie Young

FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledges applause during President Barack Obama’s remarks in the Rose Garden of the White House, June 21, 2013. The President announced James Comey, right, as his nominee to succeed Mueller. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Special Counsel Robert Mueller and former FBI Director James Comey’s long-standing relationship should have disqualified Mueller from overseeing an investigation into President Trump. Comey has been a fierce critic of the President, reports Julie Kelly in American Greatness. Without Comey, who helped fabricate the Trump-Russia collusion narrative in 2016, “there wouldn’t have been a Mueller investigation into the fabricated Trump-Russia election collusion.”

No Evidence of Conspiracy

Robert Mueller’s report shows beyond doubt, there is no evidence of a conspiracy, broad or narrow, opines the WSJ.

(Mueller’s) report recounts a series of contacts between individual Russians and Trump officials that were of no great consequence and are connected by nothing more than coincidence. Mr. Mueller should have said this clearly on Wednesday.

Mueller Shifts Responsibility to Barr

Mueller also suggested that his office reached no prosecutorial decision because Justice Department rules don’t allow the indictment of a President while in office. “Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider,” Mueller said Wednesday.

He thus left it hanging for everyone else to infer whether he would have indicted Mr. Trump if he were not a sitting President. And he left Attorney General William Barr to take responsibility for reaching the prosecutorial judgment that Mr. Mueller refused to make. Mr. Mueller added to this sneaky anti-Trump implication by noting that “the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrong doing.” What else could he mean but Congress and impeachment?

Yet Mr. Mueller’s analysis of the obstruction evidence in his own report makes clear that no investigation was obstructed. Not the FBI’s counterintelligence probe, and not his own. No witnesses were interfered with, and Mr. Mueller was allowed over two years to issue nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants and interview anyone he wanted, including anyone in the White House.

Mueller’s Job Was to Indict or Not

Wednesday Mr. Mueller also said that “if we had had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”

Since when do prosecutors make it their job to pronounce whether someone they investigate is exonerated? Their job is to indict, or not, and if not then keep quiet.

McCabe, Strzok, Page – Politically Motivated

Mueller praised “the attorneys, the FBI agents, and analysts, the professional staff who helped conduct the investigation in a fair and independent manner.” These individuals, he said, “were of the highest integrity.”

Does that include Andrew McCabe, the former deputy FBI director who is being investigated for lying to investigators? Does he mean Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the FBI paramours whose antipathy for Donald Trump is obvious from their text messages? Mr. Strzok was part of Mr. Mueller’s investigating team until those texts were discovered.

Does Mr. Mueller also mean the FBI officials who used the politically motivated, and since discredited, Steele dossier to persuade a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to issue a warrant to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page? Mr. Mueller didn’t appear to want to investigate that part of the Russia story. Was that behavior of “the highest integrity”?

Unfortunately for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, if Mueller had let his report speak for itself, the “media and backbench pressure will now build on her to open an impeachment inquiry to charge Donald Trump with obstructing an investigation that wasn’t obstructed into a conspiracy that didn’t exist.”

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Was Mueller Actually Involved in the Trump/Russia Investigation?
  • Is Mueller Going After the Truth, or Trump?
  • Mueller Investigation Categorically Exonerated President Trump. Case Closed!
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie, editor-in-chief of Richardcyoung.com, has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over three decades. When not in Key West, Debbie spends her free time researching and writing in and about Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving her Porsche Boxter S through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • President Joe Biden’s Good Question - May 25, 2022
  • Biden IGNORES Americans’ Pain at the Pump, Touts “Green Transition” - May 24, 2022
  • Our Daily Bread Threatened? - May 23, 2022

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • A Look at the Future of Main Street America
  • The County Sheriff: America’s Last Hope
  • The Masters of the Universe Align Themselves with CHINA Using YOUR Money?
  • Yes! Money Can Bring You Happiness
  • Your Cash Swept into Your Broker’s Bank Account!
  • Marry Compound Interest, Divorce Market Timing
  • What’s the Best Survival Currency?
  • U.S. Survival AR-7
  • You Want the Limo, Not the Public Bus
  • You May Be Surprised by America’s “Least Woke City”

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Jean-Pierre: Economy "Not Something that We Keep an Eye on Every Day"
  • Consequences of Biden Killing the Keystone Pipeline
  • Harvard Professor Calls Homeschooling a "Threat to Society"
  • Tucker Carlson Interviews My Favorite Florida Farmer
  • PRIMARIES: Trump Endorsed Candidates’ HUGE Night
  • PARTY'S OVER JOE: Republicans Crush Democrats in Local Elections
  • Are You Suffering from One of These Nutrient Deficiencies?
  • Our Daily Bread Threatened?
  • President Joe Biden’s Good Question
  • BUY THE DIPS? Can You Catch a Ginsu Knife?

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Nowadays, Everyone Is Getting Some Dividend Religion
  • How Can the Fed Prevent Stagflation?
  • How to Avoid the Restrictions of a Target Date Fund
  • Now You Can Own Your Vacation and It Doesn’t Have to Be a Time Share
  • Watch Out for Your Worst Enemy
  • Big Banks Adopting Blockchain for Short-Term Trading
  • Job Market Survival Advice for Graduates and for Those YOU Love
  • BULLWHIPPED? Inventory Overhang Could Slow Growth in Certain Sectors
  • BUY THE DIPS? Can You Catch a Ginsu Knife?
  • MARKET TURNING: Canada’s Housing Market Turmoil

Americans Are Abandoning ESPN and Woke Professional Sports Leagues

If You Have a Plan, I Believe You’ll Get to Where You Want to Go

President Joe Biden’s Good Question

Georgia Proves All Politics Are Local

VIDEO: DeSantis: America “Cannot Have a Ministry of Truth”

Can America Cut It’s Spending in Half? YES! It’s Been Done Before

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives