Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Freedom Force
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Bank for International Settlements

Impeachment Redux

January 12, 2021 By Debbie Young

President Donald J. Trump meets with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Congressional leadership Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2019, in the Cabinet Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Exactly how will Mrs. Pelosi argue the legal merits of impeaching President Trump? As it was last time, she might have trouble defining exactly how Donald Trump broke the law. As James Freeman happily notes, Mr. Trump has First Amendment rights, just like I do and you do. And the way Trump chose to exercise them, however, is perhaps a big reason so many people voted for him in November.

Read why UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, when asked if Trump met the legal standard of incitement, thinks not:

A friend asked me whether Trump’s speech yesterday could be punished as criminal incitement of the appalling Capitol riot.

I doubt it, at least as I read what Trump was saying. Under Brandenburg v. Ohio, even “advocacy of the use of force or of law violation” can’t be punished unless it “is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” Saying things that foreseeably move some audience members to act illegally isn’t enough. Speaking recklessly isn’t enough. The Court was well aware that speech supporting many movements—left, right, or otherwise—that merely moves the majority to political action may also lead a minority of the movement to rioting or worse. It deliberately created a speech-protective test that was very hard to satisfy.

And that test of course applies equally to all speakers, politicians or otherwise. If an ordinary citizen said what Trump had said, it seems to me very hard to see how prosecutors can show beyond a reasonable doubt that he was intentionally promoting a riot (see, e.g., Hess v. Indiana), or even intentionally promoting trespassing.

Related Posts

  • Trump's Impeachment Defense: Absence of Evidence
  • Impeachment – a Simple Way to Discredit Trump?
  • The Impeachment Muddle
  • VIDEO: President Trump Slams Impeachment at Battle Creek Rally
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie, editor-in-chief of Richardcyoung.com, has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over three decades. When not in Key West, Debbie spends her free time researching and writing in and about Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving her Porsche Boxter S through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • Biden Should Leave the Economy Alone - April 12, 2021
  • Lost Kitchen of Freedom, Maine, Booked a Year Ahead  - April 12, 2021
  • Biden’s 2nd Amendment Whoppers - April 9, 2021

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Escape From the City: You’re Going to Like What You See
  • “The Losses are Taking a Toll on Their Health”
  • Welcome to the Interest Rate Prediction Business, JACK!
  • Ron Paul: “Freedom and Central Banking Are Not Compatible”
  • Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?
  • Top 10 Political Books #1: The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America
  • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Is Senator Josh Hawley the Republican Party’s Future?
  • America’s States Rights Revolution
  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Former Pfizer VP Blows the Whistle on COVID Mortality Rate Scam
  • VIDEO: This Doctor BUSTS the COVID-19 Propaganda
  • Harris and Democrats Using ANTIFA/BLM/MS-13 Criminals To Achieve Goals
  • PAPERS PLEASE!: Sen. Rand Paul SLAMS Vaccine Passports
  • Why Your Life Before COVID Isn’t Coming Back
  • Boycott Corporate Cancel Culture
  • What's the Best Survival Currency?
  • Democrats Say Teaching Students the Constitution Could Lead to Another Civil War
  • The Four Most Important Words in Investing
  • Biden Tax Hikes: I’m Here to Help, But Only if You’re Serious

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Fidelity Investments #1: Hires 4,000 Focuses on YOU
  • Larry Summers: Stimulus “Substantially Excessive”
  • It’s as Simple as 4%? No, Not Anymore
  • Wall Street’s New Sub-Prime Borrower
  • One Word Explains the Worth of Your Neighbors’ House
  • Is Inflation Imminent? Prepare Now
  • Amazon Sneaking Up on Google and Facebook Ad Share
  • Your Survival Guy Stock: Witness This Dividend Miracle
  • Trains: A Big Deal, and the Economic Future of America
  • Your Survival Guy Stock: A Picture’s Worth a Thousand Words

Move from Mass., Conn., Vermont, Maine to New Hampshire

Biden Should Leave the Economy Alone

Demography Is Destiny: You Will Rise and Stand

How About Giving North Conway, NH a Visit?

Lost Kitchen of Freedom, Maine, Booked a Year Ahead 

Top 10 Reasons to Own an AR-15

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives