Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve

Congratulations to Flemming Rose

June 1, 2016 By The Editors

Congratulations to Flemming Rose, the winner of the Milton Friedman Prize for Advancing Liberty from the Cato Institute. Here are some selected remarks from Rose’s acceptance speech as quoted by The Wall Street Journal:

We easily get into trouble if our defense of free speech is premised on whether it contributes to truth-seeking or not, or whether it serves democracy or not, whether it is blasphemous or not, whether it offends or not, whether it undermines the war effort or not or, whether it is a threat to the common good or not—all these arguments are used every day to silence people all around the world.

They are all instrumental or utilitarian arguments. They claim that we need free speech to achieve something else that is more important than free speech. If our speech contradicts these goals of higher value, democracy, theocracy, communism, dignity understood as the right not to be offended, the historical truth, religious sensibilities, the need to eradicate hate and so on and so forth—then it is perfectly OK to criminalize that kind of speech.

This is the fundamental nature of the “I am in favor of free speech, but” position.

Thus we need a noninstrumental or nonutilitarian argument for free speech. Freedom of speech is a good in and of itself. It has intrinsic value.

Viewing free speech as an individual right rather than a mechanism to achieve a goal will lead to the conclusion that there are too many restraints on this liberty, while the “I am in favor of free speech, but” point of view always will be able to justify further limitations on speech.

The argument from autonomy means that human beings are morally self-governing individuals that are able to make up their mind about the speech of other people and decide how to respond. No politician or public opinion should have the power through criminalization and bans to hide opinions and speech from us, implying that we are not able to handle it in a reasonable and responsible way. It takes away our dignity because it is based on the assumption that we cannot be trusted to listen to certain kinds of speech. As Lincoln assumed in another context, free men should not be free to choose unfreedom for others. This is where the arguments from autonomy and dignity are grounded and where they come together in a sustainable and enduring defense for free speech.

Here are more comments from Rose at Cato Institute last year:

Related Posts

  • Congratulations Peyton Manning
  • Congratulations Sylvester Stallone!
  • Congratulations Kiss!
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • DEMOCRATS PLAY DIRTY: Megynn Kelly Calls Bulls#$t on “Classified Documents” Story - August 11, 2022
  • WATCH: Doocy Breaks Jean-Pierre with Trump Raid Questions “No Comment” - August 11, 2022
  • BECK: The Democrats’ Dangerous FBI Raid Endgame - August 11, 2022

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Gold’s 50-Year Price Explosion
  • Rich States, Poor States this State is Dominant Once Again
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • The Simple, Elegant Power of the Retirement Compounders
  • Your Cash Swept into Your Broker’s Bank Account!
  • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Stunned Democrats Against “Defund Police”
  • The Four Most Important Words in Investing
  • You May Be Surprised by America’s “Least Woke City”
  • TROJAN HORSE: “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” is Critical Race Theory in Disguise

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Buying A Boat: Who’s Looking Out for You?
  • Is It Time to Talk About the Defects of Index Funds Now?
  • Your Survival Guy’s Favorite Number is 72: Here’s Why
  • Disney Catches Netflix in Streaming Wars
  • PRIMARY RESULTS: Pro-Trump Candidates Clean Up
  • Prices for Electric Vehicles Going UP
  • Europeans Closing Businesses Early to Save on Energy
  • Your Retirement Life: Let the Slow and Steady Be Your Way of LIFE
  • Resilient Nordic Market Spawns Fast Growing Offshoot
  • If the Phone Doesn’t Ring…It’s Me

Is Merrick Garland Taking the Blame to Protect Biden?

Our Commander-in-Chief Fumbles On

Buying A Boat: Who’s Looking Out for You?

DOJ Career Officers Disgusted by Garland’s Political Raid on Trump

Dick Young’s Investing in Fine Wine

If It Smells Fishy … ?

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives