Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Uber Neocon Max Boot Often Wrong but Never in Doubt

July 19, 2018 By Richard C. Young

Author and professor Paul Gottfried writing at The American Conservative, amplifies the words of Yoram Hazony, that just because America doesn’t want to annex the territories of foreign nations, doesn’t mean it carries no imperial ambitions. In fact, says Gottfried, uber-neocon War Dog Max Boot has called for “an American empire,” outright. Gottfried writes (abridged):

Recently while reading a book by an Israeli scholar named Yoram Hazony with the provocative title The Virtue of Nationalism, I encountered a distinction drawn by the late Charles Krauthammer between empire building and American global democratic hegemony. Like the editors of the Weekly Standard, for which he periodically wrote, Krauthammer believed it was unfair to describe what he wanted to see done, which was having the U.S. actively spread its own form of government throughout the world, as “imperialism.” After all, Krauthammer said, he and those who think like him “do not hunger for new territory,” which makes it wrong to accuse them of “imperialism.”

Hazony responds with the obvious answer that control can be imposed on the unwilling even if the empire builders are not overtly annexing territory.

Meanwhile, other neoconservatives have given the game away by pushing their imperialist position a bit further than Krauthammer’s. Max Boot, for example, has been quite open in demanding “an American empire” built on ideological and military control even without outright annexation.

The question that occurred to me while reading Krauthammer’s proposal and Hazony’s response (which I suspect would have been more devastating had Hazony not been afraid of losing neoconservative friends and sponsors) is this one: how is this not imperialism?

It might be argued (and has been by neoconservatives many times) that the U.S. is both morally superior and less dangerous than ethnically defined societies because we advocate a “value” or “creed” that’s accessible to the entire human race.

Please tell me this is not what it obviously is: an invitation to war and empire building. The quest for hegemony always looks the same, no matter what moral labels some choose to give it.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • John Bolton, Most Often Dead Wrong but Never in Doubt
  • Uber Works
  • The Often Wrong but Never in Doubt Czar
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Richard C. Young
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians - March 24, 2023
  • We’ll Burn the Place Down! - March 24, 2023
  • Does Anyone Still Think Ron Paul Was Wrong? - March 23, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • SVB – There’s Panic in the Air
  • The Four Most Important Words in Investing
  • The Worst President in American History
  • TOP HEAVY: Focus on Big Indexing Could Cause Market Chaos
  • The Problem in America
  • Tom Brady Is Proof You Shouldn’t Retire if You Still Love Your Work
  • To Me There Isn’t a Better Way to Live
  • America’s States Rights Revolution
  • What a Way to Make a Living: New Hampshire #1
  • America’s Colleges Have Become Progressive Liberal Rat Holes

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Pushing Back at ESG
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver
  • Who'd be Nuts Enough to Have Put Money into SVB?
  • Biden Has Lost Control of the Northern Border Too
  • Get Well Soon Taki
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Border Patrol Chief Admits U.S. Border Is Out of Control
  • SPIES ON CAMPUS: The Chinese Have Invaded the Quad

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Is Vanguard Voting Against Your Political Beliefs?
  • Are 0DTE Options a Threat to Markets?
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • Treasury Studying How to Increase Deposit Insurance
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability?
  • Mortgage Market Not Expected to Settle Down Soon
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Is Vanguard Voting Against Your Political Beliefs?
  • Call It the Difference between Normal and Crazy
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”
  • DEMOCRATIC SENATOR: Biden’s ESG Veto “Absolutely Infuriating”
  • Are You Fairly Wealthy? I’m Listening
  • How Long Is Your Water Supply Chain?
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Be Wary of Those Who Wrap Themselves in Capes
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • ESG: Are Markets Ready for “A Needed Dose of Reality?”

Freefalling at Stanford

If You’re a Highly Effective Person, We Should Talk

DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians

We’ll Burn the Place Down!

Biden Embraces Modern Monetary Theory

Is Vanguard Voting Against Your Political Beliefs?

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives