Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • My Rifles
  • Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Old Confederacy
  • Main Street Conservative
  • BLM’s Marxist Agenda
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Freedom Force

Raphael Warnock and the Democrats’ Anti-Israel Problem

December 31, 2020 By The Editors

By Piotr Wytrazek @ Shutterstock.com

There is a sub-current of Democrats who believe Israel is the problem. Raphael Warnock appears to be one of them. Barton Swaim explains in The Wall Street Journal:

The Middle East poses a problem for the Democrats. Theirs was traditionally the pro-Israel party and still commands the support of a substantial majority of Jewish voters. But left-liberal orthodoxy demands that all right-thinking people take the side of the Palestinians against the Israeli government and hold Jerusalem to a double standard: If any other nation takes an aggressive stance against terrorist insurrectionists or other internal threats, the results may be tragic but are kept in perspective. If Israel does so, it has committed a moral outrage and broken international law.

If you aspire to higher office as a Democrat, you’re expected to sympathize with that view of things but not to adopt it too stridently. You can condemn Israel for measures it has adopted to counter the indiscriminate killing of its civilians by terrorists, but you have to couch it all in pro-Israel rhetoric, always emphasizing Israel’s “right to defend itself,” as if any country could reasonably be said to lack that right.

Most Democratic candidates have negotiated the problem reasonably well, although extreme anti-Israel outliers from safe districts, such as Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, can occasion some awkwardness for their congressional colleagues. The problem for Raphael Warnock, the Democratic Senate candidate in Georgia’s special-election runoff Jan. 5, is that he didn’t start trying to negotiate it until very recently. He is a pastor whose weekly sermons at the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta are recorded and available online, and he is the sort of left-wing clergyman who likes to make political pronouncements and to sign high-minded political statements.

He signed one such statement, composed in 2019 under the auspices of the National Council of Churches, after visiting Israel and the Palestinian territories with a group of black American and South African clergymen. The statement compared Israel’s border wall to the Berlin Wall and drew indirect but invidious analogies to apartheid, slavery and Nazism. The statement also included melodramatic language about the plight of Palestinians (“we are cut up by the misery in which poor families in Palestine have to survive”) and showed no awareness that these conditions are a consequence of Palestinians’ refusal to reject, and indeed insistence on using, murder as a political tool.

Sen. Kelly Loeffler’s campaign has underscored this and similar statements as evidence of Mr. Warnock’s radicalism. His response, in a written statement last month: “Claims that I believe Israel is an apartheid state are patently false—I do not believe that.”

It’s a common rhetorical device: Restate your opponent’s allegation in an extreme and inaccurate way, and then call that version of it false. The question wasn’t whether Mr. Warnock believed Israel is “an apartheid state” but whether he believed, in common with the international left for generations, that Israel systematically brutalizes innocent Palestinians.

He does believe that. In a 2018 sermon, for example, after a different trip to Israel, Mr. Warnock remarked: “I saw nonviolent Palestinian protesters shot down and killed this week as birds of prey by the state of Israel while we were giving lip service to ‘Peace, peace’ when there is no peace.” He went on: “What we saw in Israel this week was wrong. . . . When I see nonviolent Palestinian young folk fighting for their basic dignity and humanity and they’re told to be silent and just die quietly—for me to stand up for them, makes me no more anti-Semitic than it makes me anti-white to say ‘black lives matter.’ ”

There are three problems with this kind of talk. The first is that it’s logically fallacious and empirically false. Young Palestinian men brandishing weapons and lunging at Israeli soldiers and civilians are not “nonviolent . . . protesters,” and Mr. Warnock didn’t see any nonviolent protesters “shot down” as “birds of prey,” whatever that means.

The second problem, which Mr. Warnock now recognizes and attempts to pre-empt, is that the claim lends itself to charges of anti-Semitism. There are poor and downtrodden peoples all over the world, but proponents of progressive transnationalism mainly talk about one group, namely Palestinian Arabs, whom they tendentiously portray as passive victims and whose violent aggressions they systematically ignore or de-emphasize. Why are radicals like Mr. Warnock so determined, in defiance of reason and evidence, to represent Israeli Jews as persecutors?

A third and more practical problem with Mr. Warnock’s homiletical denunciations of Israel is that most Americans, and almost certainly most Democrats, don’t accept the premise that the Jewish state’s security policies are racist in origin and immoral in practice. Most American voters are grown-ups who can appreciate the gravity of the challenge posed to Israel by a Palestinian minority in the grip of Jew-hatred. Mr. Warnock sounds as though he can’t. Thanks mostly to statements he made before he joined the Senate race—and thanks also, perhaps, to the radical ecclesiastics with whom he consorts—he sounds like a member of the international left and not a mainstream American politician from a purple state.

Mr. Warnock seems to believe that saying Israel has a right to exist somehow counterbalances his defamations. He is fond of quoting Martin Luther King’s statement that “Israel’s right to exist as a state in security is incontestable.” That statement is true, but it underscores rather than obviates the problem. What country other than Israel needs its “right to exist” asserted?

A group called the Jewish Democratic Council of America has managed to get 200 “rabbis, cantors, and other Jewish faith leaders” to sign a letter supporting Mr. Warnock’s candidacy. There are no doubt a significant number of Jewish faith leaders who would prefer to see a Democratic Senate and would consider the elevation of Mr. Warnock a price worth paying. But I suspect Georgia voters know a leftist when they see one.

Related Posts

  • Ass of the Week: Georgia Democrat Raphael Warnock
  • Ass of the Week: Georgia Senate Candidate Raphael Warnock, Again
  • Ass of the Week: Georgia Senate Candidate Raphael Warnock, 3rd Time
  • Democrats Fading in Swing States
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
The Editors
Latest posts by The Editors (see all)
  • VIDEO: Henry U.S. Survival AR-7 - January 15, 2021
  • Supposedly “Apolitical” Organizations Show Their True Colors - January 12, 2021
  • Foreign Leaders Attack Twitter Over Trump Ban - January 12, 2021

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Who Are Those Urging Violence?
  • Is Senator Josh Hawley the Republican Party’s Future?
  • My Battle-Hardened Stock Market Strategy for the Worst of Times
  • What to Do about China?
  • Insurrection Was the Furthest Thing from Trump’s Mind
  • Vermont Abandoned, Dairy Farm Economy Devastated
  • VIDEO: Giuliani: BLM Is a Marxist Organization Planning to Destroy the Police
  • The Fed – “Independent” and “Non Political” – Joins The Resistance
  • TAC’s Robert W. Merry Unveils Presidential War Lies
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France

Our Most Popular Posts

  • The Coordinated Attack on Free Speech
  • Why Was the U.S Capitol Left So Vulnerable?
  • The Death of the Dollar and America's AA Credit
  • Who's Inciting Violence: Trump or Democrats?
  • Blue Dog Democrats Must Stop the Squad’s Assault on America
  • Enough of the Whiteness Shrieks a Woke Pelosi
  • Why Buying Bonds Matters in Times Like These
  • Media Talk of Impeachment is Absurd
  • Will We Remain a Nation Divided?
  • Was the Capitol Attack a False Flag?

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • The Fed is Sacrificing Retirees to Save the Banks
  • Jim Simons’s Renaissance Technologies vs. Internet Forum Traders
  • February RAGE Gauge: Americans Focusing on What’s In Front of Them
  • Biden Plans to Spend Trillions More on COVID-19 Stimulus
  • There’s Always a Way Forward for Americans Like YOU
  • Overtaken By Nvidia, Intel Fires Bob Swan
  • Do You Remember When NASDAQ Dropped by 82%?
  • Downcast Small Business Owners Prepare for a Difficult Four Years
  • Don’t Be on Their Radar, Get Out of Debt Now
  • Business Owners Must Reassess Relationship with Big-Tech

Insurrection Was the Furthest Thing from Trump’s Mind

Who Are Those Urging Violence?

Are $2,000 Checks Going to Rebuild NYC?

An Alert for Warm Weather, Wine Loving Mavens.

Key West’s Number One Restaurant: The Thirsty Mermaid

VIDEO: Henry U.S. Survival AR-7

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives