Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • Critical Race Theory
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money

A Modest Proposal for the Presidential/VP Debates

October 8, 2020 By David Franke

By Niyazz @ Shutterstock.com

I watched about 15 minutes of the vice presidential debate—about the same amount of time I spent watching the first presidential debate.  I cannot stand more.  I don’t have heart problems or high blood pressure, but I might if I watched an entire debate.

They just don’t make any sense.  Their only benefit is to the television channels, where they increase ratings and ad revenues.  I have no desire to help the TV moguls increase their profits.

The participants don’t answer questions, they evade them.  The questions themselves from the moderators are insipid and biased.  The real issues (as I see them) are never allowed to surface.  Everyone interrupts and talks over everyone.  I cannot recall a single instance where my vote has changed because of a candidate’s answers or conduct, and post-debate polls show that’s the case with most voters.

I took part in debate class in high school.  A major purpose was to require us to take both sides on the debate topic—teaching us how to research the topic, and the valuable lesson that there really may be two sides to a topic, with the “winner” being the debater who is better at building his or her arguments and then presenting them.  Debate rules were rigidly enforced.

That is not how it goes with these presidential and vice presidential “debates.”  They are circuses, not debates.

One specific reform, however, could solve one of the problems with the debates—the bias of the moderators.  Simply eliminate their role except as timekeepers.

With the media being almost entirely leftist and Democratic in its sentiments, this is a problem especially for the Republicans in the debates.  Even when the debate is moderated by someone from the “conservative” cable channel, Fox News, it is the most liberal of Fox’s hosts—Chris Wallace.  Tucker Carlson has no chance of becoming a debate moderator.  And I don’t understand why Republicans put up with this bias.

Give candidate A one minute to pose a specific question directly to candidate B.  Give candidate B three minutes to answer.  And then vice versa.  Limit the moderator to the role of timekeeper, perhaps armed with an airhorn or microphone silencer when a candidate goes more than a half-minute over those limits.  A flashing light on each candidate’s dais would warn them when they have reached the end of their time.  Do this twelve times—24 questions total—and you have an hour and a half of a more satisfying debate.

This won’t solve all the other problems in these debates.  But it will solve the problem of moderator bias.  If the Republican candidate fails to ask hard-hitting questions of the Democrat, instead of softballs, then at least it is the candidate’s fault, not the moderator’s fault.  And if the Democrat evades giving a direct answer, the Republican can scold that opponent during the next round and perhaps repeat the question, demanding an answer.

In the 15 minutes of the vice presidential debate that I watched, for example, the first question from the moderator to Kamala Harris was a good one:  “What would a Biden administration do in January and February that a Trump administration wouldn’t do? Would you impose new lockdowns for businesses and schools in hotspots? A federal mandate to wear masks?”  Kamala predictably evaded answering either of those questions, instead pivoting to blather about the Trump administration’s handling of the virus.  There was no follow-up from the moderator demanding an answer.

With the moderator out of the picture, it would have been Vice President Pence’s role to demand an answer, and if he failed to do that we could blame him and not the moderator.  And that would be a modest improvement over the present circus.

Related Posts

  • Presidential Debates Tonight
  • Presidential Priorities
  • Presidential Debates Intelligence
  • The Presidential Road Runner
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
David Franke
David Franke was one of the founders of the conservative movement in the late 1950s and early 1960s, starting his media career at Human Events and National Review (editorial assistant to William F. Buckley Jr.).His articles have appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Esquire, and many other publications.His books have included Safe Places, The Torture Doctor, Richard C. Young’s Financial Armadillo Strategy (as co-author to Dick Young), and America’s Right Turn (with Richard A. Viguerie).He was Senior Editor of Silver & Gold Report in the 1980s, and served as the writer/editor of John Naisbitt’s Trend Letter in the 1990s.A native Texan, David now lives in Virginia’s beautiful Shenandoah Valley.
Latest posts by David Franke (see all)
  • Will Expats Decide the Election? - October 21, 2020
  • Good Satire is Hard to Find - October 20, 2020
  • My Fearless Election Prediction - October 19, 2020

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Vermont Abandoned, Dairy Farm Economy Devastated
  • How Can You Maximize Natural Immunity to Viruses?
  • America’s Colleges Have Become Progressive Liberal Rat Holes
  • Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Charles Koch Team Up
  • Hillsdale College: What College Is Meant to Be
  • Your Survival Guy’s 2022 Super States: #1 New Hampshire
  • Your Sheriff Can Thwart Federal Gun Control Efforts
  • The Masters of the Universe Align Themselves with CHINA Using YOUR Money?
  • Americans Fleeing High Tax States for Growth Corridors
  • Concentrate on Dividend Record and Compounding

Our Most Popular Posts

  • FOOD SHORTAGE: Not "If," But "How Bad?"
  • One Surprising Thing You Should Know About Private Jets
  • Saudi Oil Is Different from U.S. Oil?
  • The Most Controversial Restaurant in Paris?
  • Good News for the 2nd Amendment
  • FLORIDA DODGED A BULLET: Elected Superb DeSantis Over Unstable Gillum
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • The Great Reset and the COVID Coup D'etat
  • Russia's "Unsubtle" Artillery Attacks Not Necessarily "Archaic"
  • BREAKING: Supreme Court DISMANTLES New York's Unconstitutional Gun Laws

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Why Work When Taxes Take It All?
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • What Happens to Your Passwords When You Die?
  • Your Survival Guy: Clearing the Decks, Buying a Boat, Seeing the World and More
  • Is the Great Job Boom Over?
  • Here’s Why You Need a 15-Year Retirement Investment Plan
  • Will ESG Do to Steel Prices What It Did to Gas Prices?
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan
  • Apple Shares Resilient in the Face of Recession
  • MONEY TALKS: The Best Service in Paris

10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights

What Just Happened? Fixing Its Historic Mistake

Why Work When Taxes Take It All?

Oil Demand Increasing Despite Growth in Renewables

Why Is the USDA Burying the Facts on Low-Carb Diets?

These Normal Household Products Could Disrupt Your Endocrine System

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives