What if FBI Director James Comey, asks Victor Davis Hanson, had been independent and autonomous and had a higher loyalty to the law?
From James Comey:
It is entirely possible that, because I was making decisions in an environment where Hillary Clinton was sure to be the next president, my concern about making her an illegitimate president by concealing the restarted investigation bore greater weight than it would have if the election appeared closer or if Donald Trump were ahead in all polls. But I don’t know.
Continues Mr. Hanson:
Here, Comey reminds us that not only was his warping of the law likely to help ensure a Clinton presidency, but it also would have been properly appreciated. Since when do FBI investigators factor in polls when they investigate evidence?
Under a President Clinton, we the American people (as opposed to Vladimir Putin) would have had no idea in 2018 of a Christopher Steele dossier, other than the mysterious residual leaks from it that would have hounded a defeated Donald Trump into ignominious retirement. Indeed, Steele would probably have gone back into deep retirement until the 2020 Clinton reelection campaign and another call from Fusion GPS to reproduce something like its 2016 winning blueprint.
As for the crew at Fusion GPS, they would probably be a presidentially authorized A-team, winking and nodding to the press about how their opposition research had sunk the loser Trump — the same way that the 2012 Obama reelection team publicly bragged about how they’d successfully mined Facebook data.
Read more here.
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
- Democrats Learn the Hard Way: “Elections Have Consequences” - July 13, 2018
- Kavanaugh, a Potential Retreat from the Political Cliff - July 12, 2018
- Why Brett Kavanaugh Will Be Confirmed – Bigly - July 11, 2018