Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Dick Young’s Safe America
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • Critical Race Theory
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money

Democracy: The Most Dangerous and Insidious Effect of Majority Rule.

June 3, 2022 By Richard C. Young

By DenisProduction.com @ Shutterstock.com

UPDATE 6.3.22: Any laws passed by the Democratic-run House and Senate barring law-abiding Americans from owning firearms can, and will be challenged in the Supreme Court. There, given a fair hearing, those laws will be invalidated as unconstitutional. Read the words of Walter E. Williams below regarding the design of the American republic. He wrote in 2007 “In recognition that it is government that poses the gravest threat to our liberties, the framers used negative phrases in reference to Congress throughout the first ten amendments to the Constitution, such as shall not abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, and shall not be violated, nor be denied.” That language exists to protect Americans from the Joe Bidens of the world, who want to strip Americans of their rights.

Originally posted on January 23, 2019.

Writing in the now defunct magazine, The Freeman, in 2007, Walter E. Williams discussed the claim that America is a democracy. He wrote (abridged):

How often do we hear the claim that our nation is a democracy? Was a democratic form of government the vision of the Founders? As it turns out, the word democracy appears nowhere in the two most fundamental founding documents of our nation—the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Instead of a democracy, the Constitution’s Article IV, Section 4, declares “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” Our pledge of allegiance to the flag says not to “the democracy for which it stands,” but to “the republic for which it stands.” Is the song that emerged during the War of 1861 “The Battle Hymn of the Democracy” or “The Battle Hymn of the Republic”?

In recognition that it is government that poses the gravest threat to our liberties, the framers used negative phrases in reference to Congress throughout the first ten amendments to the Constitution, such as shall not abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, and shall not be violated, nor be denied. In a republican form of government, there is rule of law. All citizens, including government officials, are accountable to the same laws. Government power is limited and decentralized through a system of checks and balances. Government intervenes in civil society to protect its citizens against force and fraud, but does not intervene in the cases of peaceable, voluntary exchange.

Contrast the framers’ vision of a republic with that of a democracy. According to Webster’s dictionary, a democracy is defined as “government by the people; especially: rule of the majority.” In a democracy the majority rules either directly or through its elected representatives. As in a monarchy, the law is whatever the government determines it to be. Laws do not represent reason. They represent power. The restraint is upon the individual instead of government. Unlike the rights envisioned under a republican form of government, rights in a democracy are seen as privileges and permissions that are granted by government and can be rescinded by government.

There is considerable evidence that demonstrates the disdain held by our founders for a democracy. James Madison, in Federalist No. 10, said that in a pure democracy, “there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.” At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Edmund Randolph said, “that in tracing these evils to their origin every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy.” John Adams said, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” Later on, Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.” In a word or two, the Founders knew that a democracy would lead to the same kind of tyranny the colonies suffered under King George III.

The framers gave us a Constitution that is replete with anti-majority-rule, undemocratic mechanisms. One that has come in for frequent criticism and calls for elimination is the Electoral College. In their wisdom, the framers gave us the Electoral College so that in presidential elections large, heavily populated states could not use their majority to run roughshod over small, sparsely populated states. Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress, or two-thirds of state legislatures, to propose an amendment and three-fourths of state legislatures to ratify it. Part of the reason for having a bicameral Congress is that it places another obstacle to majority rule. Fifty-one senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives and 49 senators. The Constitution gives the president a veto to thwart the power of all 535 members of Congress. It takes two-thirds of both houses of Congress to override the president’s veto.

Do today’s Americans have contempt for the republican values laid out by our Founders, or is it simply a matter of our being unschooled about the differences between a republic and a democracy? It appears that most Americans, as well as their political leaders, believe that Congress should do anything it can muster a majority vote to do. Thus we have been transformed into a democracy. The most dangerous and insidious effect of majority rule is that it confers an aura of legitimacy, decency, and respectability on acts that would otherwise be deemed tyrannical. Liberty and democracy are not synonymous and could actually be opposites.

If we have become a democracy, I guarantee you that the Founders would be deeply disappointed by our betrayal of their vision. They intended, and laid out the ground rules for, a limited republican form of government that saw the protections of personal liberties as its primary function.

Read more here from FEE, which inherited The Freeman.

 

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • The Fifties Rule!
  • Dangerous Waters
  • The Devastating Effect of Obamanomics
  • Deeply Dangerous Ideology
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • Hillary Clinton Claws at Relevance by Publicly Insulting Clarence Thomas - June 29, 2022
  • The Best Investment Strategy is Simple, Like Analog Music - June 29, 2022
  • 10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights - June 28, 2022

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • TROJAN HORSE: “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” is Critical Race Theory in Disguise
  • Richard Feynman Solved the Space Shuttle Disaster Mystery
  • America’s Number One Patriot: Naples Florida’s Alfie Oakes
  • Florida: Enjoy Certain Freedoms and Individual Liberties
  • Government Should Be Small, Laws Unobtrusive, and Men Left Alone
  • U.S. Survival AR-7
  • The County Sheriff: America’s Last Hope
  • Stunned Democrats Against “Defund Police”
  • What’s the Best Survival Currency?
  • The Three Best Retirement Decisions I Ever Made

Our Most Popular Posts

  • FOOD SHORTAGE: Not "If," But "How Bad?"
  • One Surprising Thing You Should Know About Private Jets
  • Saudi Oil Is Different from U.S. Oil?
  • The Most Controversial Restaurant in Paris?
  • Good News for the 2nd Amendment
  • FLORIDA DODGED A BULLET: Elected Superb DeSantis Over Unstable Gillum
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • BREAKING: Supreme Court DISMANTLES New York's Unconstitutional Gun Laws
  • The Great Reset and the COVID Coup D'etat
  • Why Is the USDA Burying the Facts on Low-Carb Diets?

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Why Work When Taxes Take It All?
  • Regulators’ Bungled Attempts to Cut Emissions Drove Oil Prices Higher
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”
  • What Happens to Your Passwords When You Die?
  • Your Survival Guy: Clearing the Decks, Buying a Boat, Seeing the World and More
  • Is the Great Job Boom Over?
  • Here’s Why You Need a 15-Year Retirement Investment Plan
  • Will ESG Do to Steel Prices What It Did to Gas Prices?
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan
  • Apple Shares Resilient in the Face of Recession

An Assault on America’s Central Core

Hillary Clinton Claws at Relevance by Publicly Insulting Clarence Thomas

The Best Investment Strategy is Simple, Like Analog Music

10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights

What Just Happened? Fixing Its Historic Mistake

Why Work When Taxes Take It All?

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives