Taking Legal Action against a Student Publication
You know it’s bad when Sesame Street is being thrown into the mix. The (Irish) Rover is a Catholic, conservative student-run publication at Notre Dame. A Notre Dame sociology professor, Tamara Kay, studies Sesame Street’s “cultural transfusion around the world.” Kay is suing the Rover for its coverage of Kay’s abortion activism.
Kay claims that two of its articles contained “defamatory and false statements.” The only trouble is that the Rover seems to be able to prove that what it published about Kay is true — and the paper has the receipts. Alas, another case of the decline of the American intellectual?
Kay and the Rover’s feud started in 2022 when the Rover published an article on Kay’s comments at an abortion panel.
After the event, Rover editor-in-chief Joe DeReuil interviewed Kay with a recorder, an exchange which Kay denied happened after the article was published. Kay later told New York magazine’s the Cut that DeReuil did in fact introduce himself and ask her questions though “he did not say he was interviewing me.”
But DeReuil sent National Review a recording of his conversation in which he identifies himself as the editor of the Rover before asking her questions.
How DeReuil Defended Himself and Rover at National Review:
“I feel very confident that everything that we said in both articles is true, so I don’t have any fear about the lawsuit, but it definitely is an odd situation to have a professor at a university — a tenured professor at a university — coming after a student publication.”
Good Question
Kay’s complaints don’t stop there. Also on her list are items in a subsequent article, “Tamara Kay Explains Herself to Notre Dame Democrats,” published in March 2023.
The article claimed a student at a panel asked Kay how she ended up at a Catholic university despite her pro-abortion stance. Kay claimed the question was never asked, but once again, the Rover sent a recording to National Review confirming that it had.
Seems a Pattern Is Emerging Here
Kay took issue with how each article portrayed a sign she posted on her office door following the Dobbs decision that read: “This is a SAFE SPACE to get help and information on ALL Healthcare issues and access — confidentially with care and compassion.”
The complaint objects to a line in the March article describing how Kay “post[ed] offers to procure abortion pills on her office door.” But Kay did say as much on her apparently now-defunct Twitter account. According to National Review, Kay tweeted that she would help students with access to the morning-after pill as a private citizen and defray its cost.
Spreading “mischief, mayhem and Washington gossip,” our intrepid reporter, Cockburn, posted this article in Spectator. Along the way, Cockburn also invites readers to send tips and party invites to cockburn@thespectator.com.
So how does a big-brained Ph.D., wonders Cockburn, “seek to recover from being so thoroughly embarrassed by a couple of undergraduate students?”
By suing them, it seems. Cockburn can think of a better alternative for Kay: how about keeping a low profile and hanging out at home with Elmo and Oscar the Grouch? Altogether now: “I love you / You love me / Litigate responsibly…“
To read a rejection of Professor Tamara Kay’s pro-abortion views in the Chicago Tribune by Notre Dame Professor Father Jenkins, go here.
If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.