Richardcyoung.com

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin & Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity & Wellington Since 1971
  • Hillsdale College
  • Babson College
  • Contact Us

Barring Former Lobbyists Violates the 1st Amendment

June 6, 2019 By Debbie Young

Sen Ted Cruz (TX) questions the panel as United States Border Patrol Chief Carla L. Provost delivers testimony on immigration policy before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Border Security and Immigration, in Washington, D.C., Dec. 12, 2018. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Photo by Glenn Fawcett

Sen. Ted Cruz (TX) and Dem. Rep AOC are united in their disfavor of former members of Congress becoming lobbyists.

In a recent Gallup poll, the only group worse than Congress (20% approval rating) to the public was lobbyists (6%).

Kyle Sammin reports in The Federalist that the only other group outside of Congress that polled as less ethical were lobbyists.

Lobbyists Not Dissimilar to Lawyers

,,, the ones representing my interests are crusaders for justice, brave and honest men and women who boldly speak the truth to power. In our minds, it’s always the other guy’s lawyer or the other side’s lobbyist who give them all a bad name.

It’s not easy to think of lobbyists or congressmen as downtrodden people in need of protection. And it is easy to forget in the heat of battle that the rights protected in the Constitution are not just for the weak.

Even Lobbyists Are Protected Under the 1st

Under two sections of the 1st Amendment, the right to free speech and the right to petition the government for the redress of grievances are covered.

As a matter of basic free speech, the proposed ban is already a problem. What a lobbyist does is essentially free speech in action, and not just any speech but political speech, the sort of speech that is necessary for a self-governing people.

Companies, unions, and advocacy groups hire lobbyists to talk to government officials about public policy.

Their goal is to convince those officials that their client’s view of things is correct, and that some law should be altered (or not altered) in accordance with that view.

If rights are guaranteed by the Constitution, limiting them requires a constitutional amendment. The Democrats acknowledged this when they voted (unsuccessfully) to reduce the free speech and free press protections of the First Amendment in order to overturn Citizens United v. FEC, a 2010 censorship case. Reducing the right to petition the government would require the same effort. Fortunately, respect for the Bill of Rights has become sufficiently ingrained in our culture that the thought of repealing it, even in part, gives most Americans pause.

Two Classes of Americans?

Limiting those rights in the way Ocasio-Cortez and Cruz propose is especially troublesome because it creates two classes of Americans: one who may petition the government, and one who may not. We have seen examples of this kind of thinking before, but none have made their way into law.

It brings to mind the Eighteenth Amendment, which allowed Congress to ban alcohol, and the Volstead Act, which actually banned it. The wording of the amendment is simple, the legislation that followed was more complex. Exceptions were made, loopholes exploited, and enforcement was nearly impossible. To the extent it was enforced, the Volstead Act created the first stirrings of the big government police state that we now see spread to other areas of the law.

Do Americans want snoops and spies following ex-congressmen to meetings, listening to phone calls, reading emails? The would-be Ocasio-Cortez-Cruz Act would require such activities.

The disclosures required by current law (the Lobbying Disclosure Act), passed in 1995, are a much better solution. People should be allowed to talk about whatever they want.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Former Supreme Court Justice Takes Aim at Second Amendment
  • Clinton Slams the Second Amendment
  • The Truth About the Second Amendment
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Debbie Young
Debbie Young
Debbie, our chief political writer of Richardcyoung.com, is also our chief domestic affairs writer, a contributing writer on Eastern Europe and Paris and Burgundy, France. She has been associate editor of Dick Young’s investment strategy reports for over five decades. Debbie lives in Key West, Florida, and Newport, Rhode Island, and travels extensively in Paris and Burgundy, France, cooking on her AGA Cooker, driving through Vermont and Maine, and practicing yoga. Debbie has completed the 200-hour Krama Yoga teacher training program taught by Master Instructor Ruslan Kleytman. Debbie is a strong supporting member of the NRA.
Debbie Young
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
  • What Makes America Great - July 8, 2025
  • “People Will Die” - July 7, 2025
  • Sending Capitalists to the Gulag - July 3, 2025

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • “The Losses are Taking a Toll on Their Health”
  • Are You Guided by the Prudent Man?
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”
  • “I’m Having Major Surgery Tomorrow,” He Said
  • The Biden Cabal Wants to Stop the Use of Clean, Safe, Domestic Natural Gas
  • What’s John Kerry Doing in Mexico?
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France
  • PERSECUTION: The Price Paid for Questioning Covid Narratives
  • Americans Must Demand an End to the Welfare-Warfare State
  • My Favorite Arrondissements in Paris

Our Most Popular Posts

  • What Makes America Great
  • Can Elon Musk Break the Two Party System?
  • “People Will Die”
  • Your Survival Guy: “You Wouldn’t Have Liked It”
  • How Healthy Are Eggs?
  • Just Don’t Call It “Obliterated”
  • Warthog's Last Stand: Could A-10's Have An Anti-Drone Role?
  • Survival Guy: An All-Weather Balanced Portfolio
  • Sending Capitalists to the Gulag
  • We Finally Got on the Boat

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Your Survival Guy: “You Wouldn’t Have Liked It”
  • DOE Unveils Plan to Quadruple U.S. Nuclear Power by 2050
  • How China Weaponized Rare Earths to Shift U.S. Trade Policy
  • Trump Administration Moves to Curb Foreign Ownership of U.S. Farmland
  • We Finally Got on the Boat
  • Trump Flexes Tariff Power Ahead of August 1 Deadline
  • America Remained a Net Energy Exporter as Domestic Output Soars
  • Copper Prices Surge as Global Supplies Tighten
  • Happy Independence Day!
  • Survival Guy: An All-Weather Balanced Portfolio

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy: “You Wouldn’t Have Liked It”
  • ESG Doesn’t Stand Up to Scrutiny
  • How to Dock a Boat with Helm Master EX
  • We Finally Got on the Boat
  • The Big Beautiful Bill: Good, Bad, and Ugly
  • WARNING: Your Survival Guy and Gal in the Fog
  • Happy Independence Day!
  • Survival Guy: An All-Weather Balanced Portfolio
  • A Bazooka Fired at Private Equity
  • NYC, Crypto, ESG, the Haves and the Have-Yachts

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

My Key West Garden Office

Your Retirement Life: Traveling the Efficient Frontier

Live a Long Life

Your Survival Guy’s Mt. Rushmore of Investing Legends

“Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”

Copyright © 2025 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives