Writing in the American Conservative, Daniel Larison explains the “costly and pointless” option:
War is definitely not the “only” option with Iran, and it is by far the most costly and pointless of the available options. Whenever anyone concludes that war is the “only option,” we can safely assume that this was his preference all along and his conclusion should be viewed with extreme skepticism. The U.S. can easily live with a limited Iranian nuclear program, and the best remaining way to get that is for the P5+1 and Iran to conclude an agreement. Muravchik’s “alternative” is appalling and unnecessary, and should be derided as such.
- My Investing Focus: Energy, Inflation, Dividends, Corporate Bonds - April 8, 2020
- Despite its Failure, the Left Finds a Way to Blame Trump - April 8, 2020
- Coronavirus Forces Farmers to Dump Milk - April 7, 2020