The South by Southwest (SXSW) Conference in Austin, TX this week featured guest speaker (via video conference) Edward Snowden. The NSA exposing Snowden’s appearance, as Cato’s Gene Healy points out in his weekly DC Examiner column, wasn’t without some controversy. According to Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kan. Snowden’s “only apparent qualification is his willingness to steal from his own government.” But by taking a stroll down memory lane we’ve learned that the FBI has a certain willingness to get the job done no matter what the cost. Such is the topic in Betty Medsger’s new book The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover’s Secret FBI. Gene Healy discusses the page turner here:
Forty-three years ago Saturday, an unlikely band of antiwar activists calling themselves “The Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI” broke into a bureau branch office in Media, Pa., making off with reams of classified documents. Despite a manhunt involving 200 agents at its peak, they were never caught, but the files they leaked proved that the agency was waging a secret, unconstitutional war against American citizens.
As a young Washington Post reporter, Medsger was the first to receive and publish selections from the files — over the protests of then-attorney general (and later Watergate felon) John Mitchell, who called the Post three times falsely claiming that publication would jeopardize national security and agents’ lives.
Decades in journalism really taught Medsger how to write an arresting lede; her book begins:
“In late 1970, William Davidon, a mild-mannered physics professor at Haverford College, privately asked a few people this question:
‘What do you think of burglarizing anI FBI office?’”
What follows is one hell of a (true) story: riveting as any heist film, and far more significant. With the statute of limitations expired, and the Citizens senior citizens, five of the original eight have come forward to tell the tale.
“As if arranged by the gods of irony,” Medsger writes, the very morning Hoover learned of the break-in, then-assistant attorney general William H. Rehnquist (later Chief Justice), in testimony the FBI helped prepare, told Congress that what little surveillance the government engaged in did not have a “chilling effect” on constitutional rights.
Two weeks later, one of the first documents Medsger published—a memo exhorting agents to “enhance the paranoia” among antiwar protesters and “get the point across there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox”—gave the lie to that notion.
But the most important purloined document turned out to be a routing slip with the cryptic notation “COINTELPRO—NEW LEFT.” Americans eventually learned that “COINTELPRO” was FBI argot for “counterintelligence program”: domestic “black ops” against “subversives.” It started in 1956, to fight homegrown communists, but soon expanded to target the antiwar and civil rights movements. As an FBI deputy director later explained to a congressional committee, “this was a rough, dirty business” in which the bureau “brought home” methods used against Soviet agents abroad: burglaries, illegal wiretaps, blackmail, and disinformation designed to foment violence.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy (see all)
- The Top Question in High Tax States: “Where Are You Going?” - January 27, 2020
- The Bloomberg-led Anti-Gun Movement Could Backfire at the Polls - January 24, 2020
- Democrats Are Unknowingly Working for Team Trump - January 23, 2020