Richardcyoung.com

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin & Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity & Wellington Since 1971
  • Hillsdale College
  • Babson College
  • Contact Us

Swiss Armed Neutrality

July 26, 2017 By Richard C. Young

In Target Switzerland, Stepehen P. Halbrook lays out the story of Swiss armed neutrality in World War II.

Switzerland, alone among the nations of central Europe, successfully deterred Germany from invading and occupying her territory.

Where did a small nation find the resolve and strength- military and spiritual-to resist against overwhelmingly larger and more powerful foes?

One answer lies in two words which describe Switzerland’s national military doctrine: armed neutrality.

Other European nations were characterized y centralized governments often headed by elites with the power to surrender their sovereignty to Hitler, either with a short even token resistance or no fight at all. By contrast, in Switzerland, sovereignty began with the individual, not the central authorities. And every man kept a rifle for the defense of his home, his family, his canton and finally, Switzerland herself.

Switzerland’s war time mobilization and armament-rooted in the centuries-old policy of active, armed neutrality-effectively deterred invasion by the most powerful and aggressive totalitarian state in modern European history.

America’s Founders intended that America adopt the same approach to government and national security as fellow federal republic Switzerland practiced. In the original Articles of Confederation, Sam Adams, John Hancock, Elbridge Gerry, John Dickinson, Richard Henry Lee and the other signatories intended: “Each state retain its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled.”

A weak central government of a part time nature was intended, with an appointed president selected for a one-year term to preside over “A Committee of the States” for managing the “general affairs of the United States.” In the exact same fashion as Switzerland, the Founders intended that the states and their citizens would hold the reigns of power, rather than the weak, even part-time central government.

In terms of national defense, the Articles were clear: “No body of forces shall be kept up by any state in time of peace, except such number shall be deemed requisite to garrison the forts necessary for the defense of such state.” The Founders had neither the intention nor the ability to become involved in the internal affairs of other countries.

America has much to learn from tiny Switzerland. Switzerland today has the same militia-based national defense system and decentralized cantonal (states) system of government presided over by a one-year president with few enumerated powers as it did back in the days of WWII.

Originally posted June 4, 2015.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • What Brexit Means for Switzerland
  • Swiss Francs, a Store of Value
  • THE SWISS WAY: Most Heavily Armed and Most Free
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Richard C. Young
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • NATO Bows to Trump on Spending - June 25, 2025
  • Two and Half Days to a Bomb? - June 25, 2025
  • Who Wants War with Iran? Not the American People - June 23, 2025

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • The Worst President in American History
  • The Four Most Important Words in Investing
  • What to Do about China?
  • Democracy & Diversity: Not In the Constitution
  • Could Nature’s Pharmacy Hold the Key to Cancer Recovery?
  • The Swiss Way
  • Does Big Government Create Poverty?
  • The Butterfly Effect and Chaotic Markets
  • The Breakfast of Champions
  • “I Need Preservation of Principal and Growth”

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • How Was the Trip?
  • Trade Imbalance Widens as U.S. Goods Imports Soar
  • Oil Shock? Not So Much
  • New England Leads Summer 2025 Surge in Electricity Expenditures
  • Achieving Balance in an Uncertain World
  • Markets Steady Despite U.S. Strikes on Iran
  • Apple Weighs Perplexity AI Deal to Boost Search and Siri
  • Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report from Feb. 1987
  • America’s Energy Boom: Record Net Exports and Rising Renewables
  • Senate Passes First U.S. Stablecoin Regulation Bill

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • How Was the Trip?
  • SAFETY FIRST: What’s Your Margin of Safety?
  • Complex, Costly, Often Illiquid, and Uncertain
  • Oil Shock? Not So Much
  • Le Petit Lutetia
  • Achieving Balance in an Uncertain World
  • Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report from Feb. 1987
  • Private Equity Is the Next Big Thing Coming for YOU
  • The Wildlife in Kansas
  • PRECIOUS: Silver and Gold

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

My Key West Garden Office

Your Retirement Life: Traveling the Efficient Frontier

Live a Long Life

Your Survival Guy’s Mt. Rushmore of Investing Legends

“Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”

Copyright © 2025 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives