Colorado has recalled two anti-gun senators and sent a powerful message across America. Here, writing at National Review, Charles C.W. Cooke explains the national implications of the Colorado recall vote.
The national implications of this are significant. When Bill Clinton signed the 1994 “assault weapons” ban, he didn’t just lose the House, he also lost the argument for 20 years. Colorado was supposed to be the blueprint for other “purple” states. If gun control could be done here, then why not in Pennsylvania, or Nevada — or even Texas? Now, it will presumably be difficult to convince state legislatures in other parts of the country to touch the question of guns. Privately, defenders of Morse have shared with me that, while they wanted their man to win, they wish he hadn’t put the Democratic party in this position. This is wise. Gun control rarely works out well for the party.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
- College Admission Scandal Probed by WSJ‘s Peggy Noonan - March 18, 2019
- Arthur M. Melzer: Speaking of Y When the Target is Z. - March 18, 2019
- President Trump, What do We do About Amazon? - March 18, 2019
