Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • Debbie Young
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • World Gold Mine Production

Post-War on Terror

June 3, 2014 By Richard C. Young

Cato Institute Senior Fellow Chris Preble was interviewed by John Amble at warontherocks.com. America’s policy makers should read Chris’s answer to Amble’s question on what the next phase of U.S. counter-terrorism efforts should look like. Amble’s question is in bold, with Preble’s answer below.

3.  The administration announced last week that 9,800 American troops will remain in Afghanistan after 2014, when combat operations will come to an end, and that by 2016 it will be reduced further to a small, residual force.  As an independent war effort, the U.S. mission is clearly coming to an end.  But as just one aspect (albeit a major one) of the broader “war on terrorism,” this will mark a transformation of our comprehensive counterterrorism strategy.  How do you think the next, post-Afghanistan chapter of U.S. counterterrorism should look?

I think the next chapter of U.S. counterterrorism should look mostly like the last chapter, absent the costly and quixotic nation-building mission in Afghanistan. If you look at the range of things that have been done to degrade al Qaeda’s ability to carry out another 9/11-style attack – from restrictions on the movement of money, to measures that have made it hard for al Qaeda to attract new recruits, to various efforts to round up or kill senior AQ leaders, including bin Laden himself – very little of this has depended upon a large military presence in Afghanistan. There is no reason to think that the end of the combat mission there will signal an end to U.S. counterterrorism efforts. On the contrary, freeing up resources that are now inordinately focused on just one place should improve such efforts.

Taking a step back, however, I think that we are nearing a point at which senior policymakers can have an adult conversation with the American people about terrorism. Given the trauma that we all felt immediately after 9/11, it was inevitable that some measures would be pushed through that wouldn’t have passed muster otherwise. Concepts such as “never again” and the “1 percent doctrine” prevailed. Many Americans felt that almost anything that was done to fight terrorism was justified.

Now the mood has shifted. Even though fear of terrorism among the public at large remains quite high, there is greater scrutiny over policies ostensibly geared to fighting terrorism. There is considerable opposition to the National Security Agency gathering data on innocent Americans’ phone calls and emails. The Transportation Security Administration is held in low regard. Some even question whether we need a Department of Homeland Security. Most of this public resistance is grounded in subjective notions about privacy and what constitutes unreasonable searches. But we now also have some good empirical data on the actual costs of counterterrorism policies, in dollars spent, and resources allocated or misallocated. I particularly commend the work of my colleague John Mueller, and his frequent collaborator Mark Stewart, on this score.

Lastly, we should try to remember that terrorism works by inducing fear, which, in turn, leads governments to enact policies to try reduce that fear, or otherwise reassure the public. But oftentimes these policies prove costly or counterproductive. If we are not fearful, the terrorists will have failed. If we refused to enact new policies that do not have a measurable impact on reducing the threat of terrorism, or if we rolled back some of the old ones that haven’t worked, then the terrorists also will have failed. Sound counterterrorism policy starts with not terrorizing ourselves.

Before deciding next steps for America’s foreign policy, policy makers should also pick up a copy of Chris’s book, The Power Problem and review it thoroughly.

Related video:

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • The War for Trump's Foreign Policy
  • Craving War Like Bibi
  • War Dogs Barking
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Richard C. Young
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • CBDCs Not “Just Another Form of Money” - June 6, 2023
  • Progressive Liberalism Has Dragged America near Ruination - June 6, 2023
  • Why Is the Media So Terrified of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Ideas? - June 5, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • YOU DESERVE FREEDOM: Your Hard Work Will Make It Happen
  • Yes! Money Can Bring You Happiness
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • Sen. Hawley Makes the Case Against U.S.-China Relationship
  • Hey, Where’s Everyone Going? Follow the Money Kid
  • Meet Me at Freddy’s June 2022
  • Why Black Lives Matter Needs to Be Shut Down
  • You’re Ready to “Make It a Good Month”
  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • Remembering Brent Scowcroft

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Successful Investing Is a Mindset
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • Does the Government Have a Plan to “Sneak Through” CBDCs?
  • OPEC+: Saudi Arabia To Cut 1M Barrels of Oil Production
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • What’s Hiding In the London Metals Exchange Warehouses?
  • Is the World Ready for “Mixed Reality?”
  • Does AI Need More Time to Cook?
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • June Is Retirement Compounders Month

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI
  • My Nephew Graduates, and I’m Larry the Cable Guy
  • California Is Driving These Wealthy Businesses Out of the State
  • Rome, Paris, U.S.A.: Global Crisis in Confidence
  • Your Survival Guy’s Best Insider’s Guide to Rome
  • What Is a Fiduciary Duty? Are You Working with a Fiduciary?
  • Survive and Thrive June 2023: Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Birth Rates in France Worst Since Post-WWII Era
  • Your Survival Guy Felt Like a U.N. Worker in Rome
  • Social Security: Declining Italy Needs a Bambino Boom

Is This the Summer of the Tick Fest

Your Survival Guy’s Take on ChatGPT and AI

CBDCs Not “Just Another Form of Money”

ALLIGATOR MARKET: Calm Surface Hides Danger Below

The Sham Claims of Lab-Grown “Meat”

Progressive Liberalism Has Dragged America near Ruination

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives