Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity and Vanguard Since 1971

Parts Shortage Causing 6 Month Repair Time for F-35s

November 2, 2017 By Steve Schneider

(DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Devin Doskey, U.S. Air Force/Released)

As the Pentagon accelerates towards full-rate production of the F-35 in 2019, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is reporting that maintenance facilities are facing parts shortages causing repair times up to 6 months. It has been reported that the most ambitious and costliest weapon system in world history was unable to fly 22 percent of the time from January through August because of the lack of parts.

The cost effective powerful multi-purpose F-35, second only to the F-22 in air superiority, is turning out to be none of the above. The Pentagon said it has brought the soaring cost of the F-35 under control, but the GAO is raising doubts about the claim.

The Department of Defense (DOD) is sustaining over 250 F-35 aircraft (F-35) and plans to triple the fleet by the end of 2021, but is facing sustainment challenges that are affecting warfighter readiness (see table). These challenges are largely the result of sustainment plans that do not fully include key requirements or aligned (timely and sufficient) funding. DOD is taking steps to address some challenges, but without more comprehensive plans and aligned funding, DOD risks being unable to fully leverage the F-35’s capabilities and sustain a rapidly expanding fleet.

DOD’s plan to enter into multi-year, performance-based F-35 sustainment contracts with the prime contractor has the potential to produce costs savings and other benefits, but DOD may not be well positioned to enter into such contracts by 2020. To date, DOD has not yet achieved its desired aircraft performance under pilot (i.e., trial) performance-based agreements with the prime contractor. In addition, the level of performance DOD has contracted for is generally below what the services desire (see figure 2 for Marine Corps example). Also, the three performance metrics DOD is using to incentivize the contractor under these pilot agreements may not be the appropriate metrics to achieve desired outcomes, in part because they are not fully reflective of processes for which the contractor has control. This can make it difficult for DOD to hold the contractor accountable. Further, due to system immaturity, DOD does not have full information on F-35 sustainment costs and technical characteristics such as reliability and maintainability, which could hinder its ability to effectively negotiate performance-based contracts with the contractor by 2020. Without examining whether it has the appropriate metrics to incentivize the contractor or a full understanding of the actual costs and technical characteristics of the aircraft before entering into multi-year, performance-based contracts, DOD risks overpaying the contractor for sustainment support that does not meet warfighter requirements.

DOD has taken actions to reduce F-35 sustainment costs, but estimated life cycle costs have increased and are not fully transparent to the military services (see figure 3). Specifically, the services do not fully understand how the costs they are being charged by the program office are linked to the capabilities they are receiving, citing unexplained cost increases and difficulty in tracking their requirements to contracts. For example, the Marine Corps received an initial funding requirement for fiscal year 2017 sustainment of $293 million, which then increased to $364 million in the execution year. This lack of transparency is due in part to insufficient communication between the program office and the services, and it puts the services in a difficult position as they consider critical trade-offs that may make F-35 sustainment more affordable. Without improving communication with the services about the costs they are being charged, the services may not be able to effectively budget for long-term sustainment.

Related Posts

  • Silver at 10-month High
  • Porkers of the Month - January 2011
  • Surviving the Ammo Shortage
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Steve Schneider
Steve Schneider is a weapons specialist for Richardcyoung.com. He is our website and graphic design specialist for Youngsworldmoneyforcast.com, Richardcyoung.com, and Youngresearch.com. Steve customizes and creates all of the images and political cartoons on our websites.
Latest posts by Steve Schneider (see all)
  • Dragon Tours Open for Business - February 7, 2023
  • Chinese Spy Balloon Traveling Over Sensitive U.S. Sites - February 3, 2023
  • Hypersonic Scramjet Powered Cruise Missile Aces Its Final Test - February 2, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Meet Me at Freddy’s June 2022
  • Hungarian Hardliner Viktor Orban Shows European Globalists the Way
  • The Armed American Family: Part I
  • What’s John Kerry Doing in Mexico?
  • Yes, Your Children Are Listening to You
  • Your Survival Guy’s 2022 Super States: #1 New Hampshire
  • Your Survival Guy at Fidelity and Your RMD Compliance
  • America’s Number One Patriot: Naples Florida’s Alfie Oakes
  • The Claremont Institute: Protecting the American Way of Life
  • If You’re Overexposed to Stocks, Then Look Here

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Stop America’s Zombie Apocalypse before It Starts
  • Connecticut Concedes the Fallacy of Banning Internal Combustion Engines
  • AI Running a Smarter More Efficient Inventory for Retailers
  • EVs Have 79% More Problems, and Biden is One of Them
  • $2 Billion Advanced Semiconductor Facility Planned for Arizona
  • Locking In a Generational Opportunity in Fixed Income
  • World’s Largest Container Shipper Sued for Exploitative Pandemic Behavior
  • First Class Mail Takes Backseat to Amazon Packages
  • It’s California vs. Florida in the Big State Debate
  • China Proposes Massive Integrated Super Port Across Islands

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Stop America’s Zombie Apocalypse before It Starts
  • Survive and Thrive November 2023: A Word or Two about Your Survival Guy’s Money
  • Small Government Just Works
  • Locking In a Generational Opportunity in Fixed Income
  • RIP Charlie Munger: Keeping It Simple Never Goes out of Style
  • Explosion in Gun Ownership Creates Difficulties for Progressives
  • It’s California vs. Florida in the Big State Debate
  • Shiffrin Brings It Home with World Cup Win at Killington
  • Prepare for Solar Storms in 2024
  • Can the Supreme Court Stop Wealth Taxes Before They Start?

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Five Year Treasury Yield

“The Economy Is Buried Under Trillions in Debt”

Too Late to Reform?

Stop America’s Zombie Apocalypse before It Starts

AARP Sponsors Latest Rolling Stones Concert Tour

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives