Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Great Reset
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity and Vanguard Since 1971

Deep Cuts in the Army?

February 6, 2015 By Richard C. Young

Guardsmen from Washington during training exercises.

Niskanen Center’s Matthew Fay looks at the prospects for letting the National Guard and the Army reserves play a bigger part in America’s defense structure. It’s an idea that makes sense.

Fay writes:

[T]he Guard and reserves have proven themselves capable of handling combat duty during over a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, therefore those forces can be relied on for emergency contingencies at a much lower cost. Cindy Williams of MIT made the same suggestion in a 2013essay for Foreign Affairs offering recommendations for how the military might cope with sequestration. Williams also suggests that, while the active-duty Army will certainly protests, the political clout of the National Guard will make such a transition more palatable for a secretary of defense who might propose it.

Were the United States still worried that the Red Army was going to pour through the Fulda Gap and into Western Europe, it might make sense to maintain a large peacetime Army. “Might” is the key word in that sentence, because even during the Cold War, the United States did not attempt to even remotely match Warsaw Pact ground forces in Europe in number of personnel.

Today it makes even less sense to maintain a large ground forces. The most important potential threat to the United States lies in the maritime domains of the Western Pacific and East Asian littoral. If the U.S. government insists on maintaining its current position in those regions, deterring those threats will mostly fall to air and naval forces. Even if the Pentagon manages to reform the way it buys weapons, those capabilities will remain expensive. As personnel costs continue to rise, it crowds out funding to procure new weapons and modernize those forces.

The Army, as the service most reliant on manpower, is already scheduled to reduce its number of active duty personnel to 420,000 by 2019. The force should be cut even deeper with a large number of personnel shifted to the Guard and reserve. Advocates of increased defense spending believe the burden for covering the costs of modernizing the U.S. military’s capabilities should be shifted to American taxpayers. To make room in the defense budget they should instead be looking to the type of “radical” solution Navarro offers.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Toward a Libertarian Foreign Policy
  • Switzerland’s Foreign Policy
  • VIDEO: Toward a Libertarian Foreign Policy
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Richard C. Young
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • The End of America’s One-Party System? - October 4, 2023
  • The Best Place to Cut Spending - October 3, 2023
  • ESTABLISHMENT NIGHTMARE: Tucker Carlson Interviews RFK Jr. - October 3, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Rich States, Poor States this State is Dominant Once Again
  • The Problem in America
  • The Simple, Elegant Power of the Retirement Compounders
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • Stunned Democrats Against “Defund Police”
  • You Need to Seek Some Shelter for When Things Get Ugly
  • 751 “No-Go” Zones in France
  • Biden Wants to Gut the Tax Benefit of 401K Plans
  • Victor Davis Hanson: How to Bust DC’s Stronghold
  • Making America Great Again Is What America Wants

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • “Wow, That Was an Obvious Buying Opportunity”
  • Americans Watch as Household Incomes Drop
  • “Doctor, What Are You Doing?” “Nothing,” He Said
  • Has Tupperware Survived Its Brush with Death?
  • Biden’s “War” On Fossil Fuels Keeps Shale Drillers Idle as Oil Prices Rise
  • “Oh, This Is Prime Real Estate,” They Say
  • Investing Habits of the Fairly Wealthy: #10 Powerball
  • “Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”
  • India Chooses to Promote Coastal Trade. The US Should Too
  • “No Way I’m Spending That Much on Those”

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • “Wow, That Was an Obvious Buying Opportunity”
  • Does Anyone Remember the National Debt?
  • French Banker Endorses New International CBDC System
  • “Doctor, What Are You Doing?” “Nothing,” He Said
  • Bidenflation Making It Harder to Retire
  • Will Illinois Gun Owners Register Their Firearms?
  • “Oh, This Is Prime Real Estate,” They Say
  • Survive and Thrive September 2023: “I Want to Be a Farmer, a Garbageman, or Tom Brady”
  • Tucker and O’Reilly Discuss the Three People Everyone Needs
  • Investing Habits of the Fairly Wealthy: #10 Powerball

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Five Year Treasury Yield

“The Economy Is Buried Under Trillions in Debt”

Horse Manure: Windmill/Sun Power Scheme

“Wow, That Was an Obvious Buying Opportunity”

The End of America’s One-Party System?

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives