Richardcyoung.com

  • Home
  • Debbie Young
  • Jimmy Buffett
  • Key West
  • Your Survival Guy
  • How We Are Different
  • Paris
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • The Swiss Way
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • Dick Young
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool
  • Anti-Gun Control
  • Anti-Digital Currency
  • Joel Salatin & Alfie Oakes
  • World Gold Mine Production
  • Fidelity & Wellington Since 1971
  • Hillsdale College
  • Babson College
  • Artificial Intelligence Opposed
  • Contact Us

Breaking Up the United States, Part 1

April 26, 2016 By Justin Logan

With the nation locked in a pulsing tug of war over who gets to determine who goes peepee in which potty, perhaps it is time to consider breaking up the United States.

Don’t laugh. It’s an argument with a rich tradition behind it. Today: the tradition. Next week: the praxis.

One of the first serious debates in American politics was over the question of whether the prospective United States was too large to remain a republic. On behalf of the anti-federalists, “Brutus” wrote that

a free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants, and these encreasing in such rapid progression as that of the whole United States.

Keep in mind, this was the 13 colonies we were talking about. Brutus went on to quote Montesquieu on the ideal size of a republic, concluding on his own that

In a republic, the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar. If this be not the case, there will be a constant clashing of opinions; and the representatives of one part will be continually striving, against those of the other. This will retard the operations of government, and prevent such conclusions as will promote the public good. If we apply this remark to the condition of the United States, we shall be convinced that it forbids that we should be one government. The United States includes a variety of climates. The productions of the different parts of the union are very variant, and their interests, of consequence, diverse. Their manners and habits differ as much as their climates and productions; and their sentiments are by no means coincident. The laws and customs of the several states are, in many respects, very diverse, and in some opposite; each would be in favor of its own interests and customs, and, of consequence, a legislature, formed of representatives from the respective parts, would not only be too numerous to act with any care or decision, but would be composed of such heterogenous and discordant principles, as would constantly be contending with each other.

Is there a historical judgment that, more than 200 years on, holds up better?

As the United States aggressively expanded from 13 small, united states into a throbbing superpower acting on behalf of (or ignoring) any agglomeration of world citizens that caught its fancy, the question became more, not less, pertinent.

George Kennan, the architect of containment who, despite this legacy, was a notable dove and anti-establishmentarian, worried at the end of his life about many things that did not warrant worry, including cars, computers, and women’s suffrage. But he also worried about the sheer size of the United States.. Wasn’t it the case, Kennan fretted, that

[t]he great country has a vulnerability to dreams of power and glory to which the smaller state is less easily inclined[?]

Kennan’s radical solution to this dilemma? He wondered whether

our country, while retaining certain of the rudiments of a federal government, were to be decentralized into something like a dozen constituent republics, absorbing not only the powers of the existing states, but a considerable part of those of the present federal establishment.

Yes, a radical idea. But perhaps a radical idea whose time has come. Next week: what getting from here to there might look like, and why we all might run away from the idea, screaming.

Related Posts

  • Breaking Up the United States, Part 2
  • A Neutral United States?
  • Survival States: Sales Taxes
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Justin Logan
Justin Logan
Justin Logan is a contributing editor for RichardCYoung.com. Formerly the Cato Institute's director of foreign policy studies, Logan writes primarily about politics and American foreign policy. He holds a master’s degree in international relations from the University of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in international relations from American University. He is an expert on U.S. grand strategy, international relations theory, and American foreign policy. He has lectured on American strategy across the country and across the world, and his articles have appeared in International Security, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Foreign Policy, the National Interest, the Harvard International Review, Orbis, National Review, the American Conservative, Reason, Politico, and the American Prospect, among others. A native Missourian, Logan currently lives in Washington, DC with his wife and two sons, where they are opening a Latin American wine and spirits bar, Ruta del Vino.
Justin Logan
Latest posts by Justin Logan (see all)
  • The Case for Zero-Based Strategy - December 4, 2018
  • Thinking About a Noninterventionist Political Alliance - October 29, 2018
  • The Iran Issue Is Not Going Away …and All of the Wrong People Are in Charge - September 25, 2018

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • To Me There Isn’t a Better Way to Live
  • The Government Attack on Americans’ Independence
  • The Common Ground of Democracy is Sinking Beneath Americans’ Feet
  • The Clock is Ticking: You Must Protect Your Family
  • Your Best State on Guns, Plus the 8th Wonder of the World
  • A Threat to Our Constitutional System
  • What a Way to Make a Living: New Hampshire #1
  • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • BANKERS’ WARS: Is Central Banking the Root of Global Conflict?
  • Hey, Where’s Everyone Going? Follow the Money Kid

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • Congratulations, You’re Retired #3: “When You Were Young”
  • Magnets Run the World — And China Runs the Magnets
  • USGS Launches Major New England Critical Minerals Survey
  • U.S. Import and Export Prices Edge Up in April Amid Fuel Declines
  • Denmark Considers Ending 40-Year Nuclear Ban
  • Apple’s Next-Gen CarPlay Rolls Out in U.S. and Canada
  • Congratulations on Graduation Day from Work to Retirement “2.0 and Go”
  • Could an Economic Slowdown Curb Global Oil Consumption Growth?
  • No SALT Please: Part II
  • Vertical Aerospace Advances Toward VX4 Certification

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Congratulations, You’re Retired #3: “When You Were Young”
  • Are You Giving a Tax Free Gift in 2025?
  • Does Your Lazy Cash Need a Home?
  • Congratulations on Graduation Day from Work to Retirement “2.0 and Go”
  • $3 Million Makeover of the International Tennis Hall of Fame
  • No SALT Please: Part II
  • Graduating from Work to Retirement: Now What? Part 1
  • You’re Not Dreaming, Food Prices Are Falling
  • Can America Generate Enough Power for New Data Centers?
  • TRUMP: More SALT Please

US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

My Key West Garden Office

Your Retirement Life: Traveling the Efficient Frontier

Live a Long Life

Your Survival Guy’s Mt. Rushmore of Investing Legends

“Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”

Copyright © 2025 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives