“It’s an astonishing event,” writes George Will, as reported in the WSJ. Hillary (Clinton) wants to change the First Amendment “in order to further empower the political class to regulate the quantity, content and timing of political speech about the political class.”
Read here from Mr. Will’s speech at the William F. Buckley, Jr. Disinvitation Dinner about those who have had their invitation to speak at U.S. universities retracted because of their views. What is even more astounding is “there’s not a ripple of commentary about this on the stagnant waters of the American journalistic community.”
Will writes:
Free speech has never been, in the history of our republic, more comprehensively, aggressively and dangerously threatened than it is now. The Alien and Sedition Acts arose from a temporary, transitory fever and were in any case sunsetted and disappeared. The fevers after and during the First World War and in the early culture war era also were eruptions of distemper rooted in local conditions and local issues bound to disappear, which they did.
Today’s attack is different. It’s an attack on the theory of freedom of speech. It is an attack on the desirability of free speech and indeed if listened to carefully and plumbed fully, what we have today is an attack on the very possibility of free speech. The belief is that the First Amendment is a mistake. . . .
Yesterday the Democratic Party, the oldest political party in the world, the party that guided this country through two world wars and is more responsible than any other for the shape of the modern American state—the Democratic Party’s leading and prohibitively favored frontrunner candidate for the presidential nomination announced four goals for her public life going forward, one of which is to amend the Bill of Rights to make it less protective. It’s an astonishing event. She said that she wants to change the First Amendment in order to further empower the political class to regulate the quantity, content and timing of political speech about the political class—and so far as I can tell there’s not a ripple of commentary about this on the stagnant waters of the American journalistic community.
Related video:
