President Donald J. Trump concludes his remarks at the 450th mile of the new border wall Tuesday, Jan. 12, 2021, near the Texas Mexico border. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
Are the real facts of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump being covered up right in front of America? Paul Craig Roberts provides a skeptical view of the official narrative, writing:
Based on the acoustic analysis presented by Mike Adams and Chris Martenson, here is my interpretation of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
Adams concluded that the first three shots came from Crooks on the building roof. However, Adams later says he thinks shots afterward came from inside the building on which Crooks was perched. Adams concludes that the first three shots came from Crooks, because the calculated distance coincides with Crooks’ location. But shooters from inside the building would be at the same distance from Trump as Crooks.
Martenson provides evidence that the first three shots did not come from Crooks. He points out that the trajectory of the bullets was upward, not downward. Therefore, they could not have been fired from on top of the building.
Keep this in mind and remember the surprised reaction of the two police snipers who had been observing Crooks for 20 minutes prior to the shooting. When the first shots were fired, they jumped up and quickly repositioned their scopes. This suggests that they were surprised that the first shots did not come from Crooks but from a source they were not observing. It would be interesting to hear their explanation of their surprised reaction.
The value of the ballistic analysis is that it establishes conclusively that there were more than one shooter. But the upward trajectory of the bullets and the apparent police surprise that the initial shots did not come from the expected source indicate that more thought is required as to where the first shots originated.
As what clearly is a deep state assassination attempt will be covered up, it leaves Trump exposed to another attempt.
Read more here.
My jaw is on the floor
This PhD did a scientific analysis of all bullet audio signatures from the Trump assassination footage
CONCLUSION: Raw Audio evidence proves there were *at least* two shooters firing different weapons in two locations to kill Trumppic.twitter.com/SLTpCrjAd9
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 19, 2024
If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for the Richardcyoung.com free weekly email.
