Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

America’s Constitution, The Army Clause

May 11, 2017 By Richard C. Young

The Battle of Long Island, New York

Anyone wondering about the intent of America’s founders on whether or not the U.S. ought to be participating in protracted foreign interventions has an easy reference to their thinking. The Army Clause in the U.S. Constitution says simply and plainly “The Congress shall have Power To …raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years….” No appropriation should last longer than two years. Meaning the founders expected Congress to critically reassess such spending regularly. The meaning of that clause has been lost on serial appropriators who every year rubber-stamp continued involvement in myriad nations’ domestic struggles. Here on the Heritage Foundation web site you can read a detailed analysis of The Army Clause by Mackubin Owens of the U.S. Naval War College.

For most Americans after the Revolution, a standing army was one of the most dangerous threats to liberty. In thinking about the potential dangers of a standing army, the Founding generation had before them the precedents of Rome and England. In the first case, Julius Caesar marched his provincial army into Rome, overthrowing the power of the Senate, destroying the republic, and laying the foundation of empire. In the second, Cromwell used the army to abolish Parliament and to rule as dictator. In addition, in the period leading up to the Revolution, the British Crown had forced the American colonists to quarter and otherwise support its troops, which the colonists saw as nothing more than an army of occupation. Under British practice, the king was not only the commander in chief; it was he who raised the armed forces. The Framers were determined not to lodge the power of raising an army with the executive.

Many of the men who met in Philadelphia to draft the Constitution, however, had the experience of serving with the Continental Line, the army that ultimately bested the British for our independence. Founders like George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton were also acutely aware of the dangers external enemies posed to the new republic. The British and Spanish were not only on the frontiers of the new nation. In many cases they were within the frontiers, allying with the Indians and attempting to induce frontier settlements to split off from the country. The recent Shays’s Rebellion in Massachusetts had also impelled the Framers to consider the possibility of local rebellion.

The “raise and support Armies” clause was the Framers’ solution to the dilemma. The Constitutional Convention accepted the need for a standing army but sought to maintain control by the appropriations power of Congress, which the Founders viewed as the branch of government closest to the people.

The compromise, however, did not satisfy the Anti-Federalists. They largely shared the perspective of James Burgh, who, in his Political Disquisitions (1774), called a “standing army in times of peace, one of the most hurtful, and most dangerous of abuses.” The Anti-Federalist paper A Democratic Federalist called a standing army “that great support of tyrants.” And Brutus, the most influential series of essays opposing ratification, argued that standing armies “are dangerous to the liberties of a people…not only because the rulers may employ them for the purposes of supporting themselves in any usurpation of powers, which they may see proper to exercise, but there is a great hazard, that any army will subvert the forms of government, under whose authority, they are raised, and establish one, according to the pleasure of their leader.” During the Virginia ratifying convention, George Mason exclaimed, “What havoc, desolation, and destruction, have been perpetrated by standing armies!” The Anti-Federalists would have preferred that the defense of the nation remain entirely with the state militias.

Read more here.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • America's Defenders of the Constitution
  • Standing Army or Militia For America?
  • America's Silent Army with 423M Guns
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • Trump Channeled Pat Buchanan to Win GOP Primary - February 6, 2023
  • COVID: Demand Accountability for the World’s Biggest Ponzi Schemers - February 6, 2023
  • Will Biden Start Wars with Both Russia and China? - February 6, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • DIGITAL ID: You Are More than a Soulless Digital Identity
  • DEATH SPIRAL: Crime Soars in Democrats’ #DEFUNDTHEPOLICE Cities
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Charles Koch Team Up
  • The Claremont Institute: Protecting the American Way of Life
  • What’s the Best Survival Currency?
  • What Do You Know About Rho-Kinase?
  • TROJAN HORSE: “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” is Critical Race Theory in Disguise
  • My Battle-Hardened Stock Market Strategy for the Worst of Times
  • YOU DESERVE FREEDOM: Your Hard Work Will Make It Happen

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Will Western Tanks Be a Game Changer in Ukraine?
  • Europe Should Protect Itself
  • “I Will Veto Everything They Send Me”
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • US Debt Now Exceeds Annual GDP?
  • How to Fight Wokism Idiocy
  • The Neocon Russia-Hoaxers of Hamilton 68 Must Be Held Accountable
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • SEN. KENNEDY: This Is How to Fix Biden's Border Disaster

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • What Your Survival Guy Invested in Today
  • Your Retirement Life: Adventure Awaits
  • UK Takes Aim at the Cryptocurrency Industry
  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • Do You Trust This Rally?
  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More
  • What Happens if the “Fed Put” Is Over for Good?
  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You?
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • What Your Survival Guy Invested in Today
  • You Invest, They Win: FTX Edition
  • Your Retirement Life: Adventure Awaits
  • Zumwalt-Class Guided Missile Destroyers to Get Hypersonic Weapons
  • Early Advice from Her Dad on Tipping at Charlie Trotter’s
  • Treasury Bonds Ready to Rock and Roll
  • Survive and Thrive February 2023: 4 Life Changing Words: “You Should Try This”
  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You?
  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More
  • America’s Unprecedented Debt Problem

Trump Channeled Pat Buchanan to Win GOP Primary

Hang Tight or Hang Alone

What Your Survival Guy Invested in Today

COVID: Demand Accountability for the World’s Biggest Ponzi Schemers

Will Biden Start Wars with Both Russia and China?

Price Controls Won’t Work in Any Country

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives