Richardcyoung.com

The Online Home of Author and Investor, Dick Young

  • Home
  • How We Are Different
  • About Us
    • Foundation Principles
    • Contributors
  • Investing
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
  • Your Survival Guy
  • The Great Reset
  • COVID-19
  • My Rifles
  • Dividends and Compounding
  • Your Security
  • The Swiss Way
  • Dick Young
  • Debbie Young
  • Key West
  • Paris
  • Dick’s R&B Top 100
  • Liberty & Freedom Map
  • Bank Credit & Money
  • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
  • NNT & Cholesterol
  • Work to Make Money/Invest to Save Money
  • Your Health
  • Ron Paul
  • US Treasury Yield Curve: My Favorite Investor Tool

Armey’s Army

March 19, 2009 By Richard C. Young

Dick Armey was recently on The Charlie Rose Show talking about how he sees the current debate in Washington, and about FreedomWorks, “the longest-standing, most effective conservative small-government grassroots organization in the country.” FreedomWorks boasts over 800,000 members across the country. Armey has led FreedomWorks in supporting the nationwide TEA party protests and in lobbying politicians for smaller government and lower taxes.

As well as being chairman of FreedomWorks, Armey is a former House Majority Leader, the main author of Contract with America, author of several books, the former ranking Republican on the House Joint Economic Committee, former GOP Conference chairman, and former professor of economics at the University of North Texas. He spent 18 years in Congress and was a strong believer in the policies of Ronald Reagan. He describes himself in the Charlie Rose interview as a libertarian who recognizes government.

Armey had some excellent responses in his interview on The Charlie Rose Show. We would like to feature a few of them here for you.

Comments regarding the following:

Makeup of Washington
CHARLIE ROSE: Listen to this, what you say. “Nearly every important office in Washington D.C. today is occupied-nearly every important office in Washington is occupied by someone with an aggressive dislike for our heritage, our freedom, our history, and our Constitution.” You cannot believe this.

DICK ARMEY: I do believe this.

CHARLIE ROSE: Every?

DICK ARMEY: Almost.

CHARLIE ROSE: Listen, “Nearly every important office is occupied by someone with an aggressive dislike for our heritage, our freedom, our history, and our Constitution.”

DICK ARMEY: Absolutely, yes. I do. I do. I believe that. I wouldn’t have said it if I didn’t believe it to be true. It’s a harsh thing to say.

CHARLIE ROSE: It is a very harsh thing to say.

DICK ARMEY: If I did not believe it to be true.

CHARLIE ROSE: And it shows a level of intolerance for others.

DICK ARMEY: No.

CHARLIE ROSE: It’s basically saying-

DICK ARMEY: If you’re walking down the alley, and I know there’s a person in the alley that will be there to mug you, and I didn’t tell you that person doesn’t share your values and would mug you for what’s in your billfold, you would call me a mean person for not warning you.

CHARLIE ROSE: On the other hand, there are honest differences in terms of national purpose. You say “an aggressive dislike for our heritage.” Are you suggesting, for example, that Joe Biden has an aggressive dislike for our heritage? Do you think that President Obama has an aggressive dislike-

DICK ARMEY: Yes, I do.

CHARLIE ROSE: You can’t believe an aggressive dislike of our heritage-

DICK ARMEY: The most important document in the history of our nation, perhaps the history of the world, with respect to this thing called governance, is the American Constitution. President Obama says it’s a living document and it really means what I want it to mean.

The President:
CHARLIE ROSE: You’re at a speech in CPAC, you said, addressing President Obama directly, “You’re intellectually shallow. You’re a romantic. You’re self-indulgent. You have no ability. You’re the most incompetent president perhaps in our lifetime.” Did you mean all that?

DICK ARMEY: Those are observations of what I believe to be factual observations.

CHARLIE ROSE: “Intellectually shallow”?

DICK ARMEY: Yes.

CHARLIE ROSE: “Self-indulgent”? “No ability”?

DICK ARMEY: Now wait a minute. You have to understand, [if] the president of the United States is going to use all of the authority in his office to engage in billions and billions and hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of economic policy [he] should understand the fundamental rudiments of economics.

CHARLIE ROSE: What makes you think he doesn’t?

DICK ARMEY: It’s clear he doesn’t. He believes that the object of public policy should be redistributing income and managing the economy. I mean, there is no model in the history of the world that is such a totally proven failure as government management of the economy.

Health Care:
CHARLIE ROSE: What kind of health-care reform would you like to see?

DICK ARMEY: Let’s address the tort laws. How about the sale of insurance across state lines? John Shadegg from Arizona has the perfect bill by which it can be done. Why have we never given a person in America who buys insurance for themselves the same consideration in the tax law as is given to somebody who is buying insurance on behalf of somebody else through the employer-provided system?

The Perfect Presidential Candidate:

CHARLIE ROSE: Define for me a presidential candidate that Dick Armey could enthusiastically support.

DICK ARMEY: Well, of course the last one was Ronald Reagan.

One thing we like so much about Dick Armey is that he has unshakable principles. When asked about whether there was any wiggle room in his principles, he answered firmly. Here’s what was said.

CHARLIE ROSE: Can’t you allow some differences about big government in terms of how one person defines a purpose of government and [how you define it] without suggesting they have an aggressive dislike for our heritage, our Constitution, and our history?

DICK ARMEY: Absolutely not.

This assertion echoes another famous quote from Armey: “You can compromise on details, you can compromise on strategies, but you must never compromise on principles.”

In the coming presidential election of 2012, conservatives will have a chance to choose a candidate. While it is likely too much to hope that Armey would consider running, a conservative who embraced the principles held by Armey would be well on his or her way to winning the election.

We previously outlined our view of the current political landscape in America. Here is a summary of how our fictional parties might lay out, and who might head those parties.

Christian Conservative
Percent of Voters: 25.5%
Hypothetical Spokesman: Sarah Palin
Affiliates: Alliance Defense Fund, Evangelical Christians, Catholics (including a large Hispanic contingent), Baptists (including a large African-American contingent), and NRLC.

National Freedom
Percent of Voters: 25.0%
Hypothetical Spokesman: Dick Armey
Affiliates: NRA, CATO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Institute for Justice, the Federalist Society, Club for Growth, Campaign for Liberty, the TEA parties, and Dick Young.

Neoconservative
Percent of Voters: 7.0%
Hypothetical Spokesman: Bill Kristol
Affiliates: American Enterprise Institute, Project for a New American Century, and AIPAC.

Green Labor
Percent of Voters: 13.0%
Hypothetical Spokesman: Al Gore
Affiliates: Sierra Club, PETA, the Union of Concerned Scientists, the green energy lobby, SEIU, AFL-CIO, UAW, teamsters.

Progressive Socialists
Percent of Voters: 24.5%
Hypothetical Spokesman: John Podesta
Affiliates: ACLU, MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, ACORN, NOW, NARAL, and the Radical Progressive Movement.

National American
Percent of Voters: 2.5%

Socialist People’s
Percent of Voters: 2.5%

As you can see, we put Dick Armey at the head of our National Freedom party and included groups of people that explicitly fight for greater freedoms for Americans in that party.

The last election was lost by 8.5 million votes. A mere 4.25 million votes could have changed the outcome. That’s one night’s worth of Bill O’Reilly viewers, a quarter of the listenership of Rush Limbaugh, and one-seventh of the monthly audience of Glenn Beck. John McCain was not a conservative choice. A conservative who can impress and earn the endorsement of these media gurus will have a very good chance at beating Barack Obama in the 2012 election.

There are skilled, conservative leaders out there like Mitch Daniels and Rob Portman. No one is ever going to be perfect; as Dick Armey said, Ronald Reagan was the last one who came close. Even Armey and Reagan butted heads over things like base closures. But a principled conservative who gets on board with the foundation principles put forth on these pages will have success. That person will be supported by Armey’s Army, FreedomWorks, and other conservatives who are tired of big-spending Republicans and Democrats who lead the country to war and spend it to death.

If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.

Related Posts

  • Standing Army or Militia For America?
  • Ukraine Building Citizens Army
  • Prevent the Establishment of a Standing Army
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Richard C. Young
Richard C. Young is the editor of Young's World Money Forecast, and a contributing editor to both Richardcyoung.com and Youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Richard C. Young (see all)
  • Europe Should Protect Itself - January 31, 2023
  • The Neocon Russia-Hoaxers of Hamilton 68 Must Be Held Accountable - January 31, 2023
  • Despite Western Aid the Russians Are Slowly Taking Ukraine’s Territory - January 30, 2023

Dick Young’s Must Reads

  • Americans Fleeing High Tax States for Growth Corridors
  • DONBAS: Russian Tanks Face Gauntlet of Death from Javelin Wielding Ukrainians
  • What to Do about China?
  • TOP HEAVY: Focus on Big Indexing Could Cause Market Chaos
  • You May Be Surprised by America’s “Least Woke City”
  • California’s Progressive Liberals Have Created a Monster
  • What a Way to Make a Living: New Hampshire #1
  • “An Epic Struggle Over the Definition of America”
  • You Want the Limo, Not the Public Bus
  • Joel Salatin and Alfie Oakes, America’s Food Kings

Our Most Popular Posts

  • Pfizer CEO Terrified of Real Questions About His Vaccines
  • Will Western Tanks Be a Game Changer in Ukraine?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • US Debt Now Exceeds Annual GDP?
  • Europe Should Protect Itself
  • Give Me Clean, Efficient Gas
  • “I Will Veto Everything They Send Me”
  • How to Fight Wokism Idiocy
  • America's Super States and Stocks that Respect YOU
  • How the Biden Administration Is Destroying Our Energy Infrastructure

Disclosure

RSS Youngresearch.com

  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Are the Realists Winning the Debate over the Future of EVs?
  • CATO: Global Freedom Is in Sharp Decline
  • Biden Administration Destroying Retiree Fiduciary Protections
  • 4 Life Changing Words for Your Survival Guy: “You Should Try This”
  • Suddenly, Holding Cash Looks Good Again to Many
  • Anti-Carbon Crusaders in Davos Talk ESG and OPM
  • Is Passive Investing Already Passé?
  • Welcome to Hotel California, Where You Can Never Leave

RSS Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?
  • Warren Miller: If You Don’t Do It This Year, You’ll Be…
  • Your Investment Focus Is the Foundation for Success
  • CATO: Global Freedom Is in Sharp Decline
  • TIME FOR A GONDOLA? Little Cottonwood Canyon Jammed with Traffic
  • Biden Administration Destroying Retiree Fiduciary Protections
  • 4 Life Changing Words for Your Survival Guy: “You Should Try This”
  • Anti-Carbon Crusaders in Davos Talk ESG and OPM
  • Welcome to Hotel California, Where You Can Never Leave

“I Will Veto Everything They Send Me”

Europe Should Protect Itself

What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?

The Neocon Russia-Hoaxers of Hamilton 68 Must Be Held Accountable

Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care?

How to Fight Wokism Idiocy

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions | About Us | Dick Young | Archives