Originally posted March 12, 2015.
Here we go again, two decades later and American voters’ choices are, perhaps, yet another Clinton and another Bush? Although many voters understandably may not want another Bush, is there any American who wants another four to eight years of Clintons ensconced in the White House?
Under the “most transparent presidency” we have ever had, President Obama’s Secretary of State is saying that she “did not send any email that had classified information in it.” But can Mrs. Clinton, as Secretary of State of the U.S., not have some info that was sent or received that might be classified? Mrs. Clinton used an email to conduct all official business—not just private email—on one created and operated by a private computer server in her home.
What is abundantly questionable is, can the United States stand another Clinton leadership with all of its scandals, from commodities trading, Whitewater, Vince Foster, Lewinsky, campaign financing, to the Clinton Foundation?
As the WSJ’s asks in Review & Outlook, how could Ms. Clinton have done her job as Secretary of State if she didn’t send or receive classified emails?
Are we voters as morally bankrupt as our leaders seem to be?
Latest posts by Debbie Young (see all)
- The Obama Administration’s Uranium Scandal - October 23, 2017
- Russia’s Millions to Clinton’s Charitable Foundation? - October 20, 2017
- A New Belief in the Sanctity of Insurance Companies - October 19, 2017